Vauxhall Corsa MOT Results

Registered in 2010
59.1% pass rate
from 71,805 tests in 2020
(21% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Corsa is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (52% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Stop lamp (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamps (83% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Headlamp (86% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Headlamp levelling device (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0028% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (96% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0014% fail on Matched pair
      • 0.0014% fail on Dipswitch
    • 4.2% fail on Direction indicators (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Flashing type (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.5% fail on Individual direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.56% fail on All direction indicators (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Side repeaters (76% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Switch
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim (35% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim (29% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (38% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Position lamps (9.6% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Position lamp (10% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.043% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.63% fail on Electrical equipment (83% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Horn (74% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Battery(ies) (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.0014% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.37% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (19% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Rear fog lamp (19% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Rear fog lamp (20% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.015% fail on Switch
      • 0.0042% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.0042% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 0.28% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.28% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.0014% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.019% fail on Rear reflectors (68% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0084% fail on Hazard warning (76% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0084% fail on Switch (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0070% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.0070% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 15% fail on Suspension (36% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 8.5% fail on Springs (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 8.5% fail on Coil springs (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 8.5% fail on Coil spring (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.043% fail on Mounting (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0014% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.0014% fail on Spring saddle
      • 0.0014% fail on Bonded suspension units
        • 0.0014% fail on Attachment bracket
    • 4.7% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (60% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (55% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Linkage ball joints (59% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover (52% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint (57% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Linkage (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0084% fail on Anti-roll bar (62% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0042% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0028% fail on Pins and bushes (94% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0014% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.1% fail on Suspension arms (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Pins and bushes (42% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.091% fail on Ball joint dust cover (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.0056% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.54% fail on Macpherson strut (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on Macpherson strut (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0084% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Wheel bearings (17% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Sub-frames (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Sub-frame (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0014% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.079% fail on Other suspension component (61% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Ball joint (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Pins and bushes (54% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0097% fail on Ball joint dust cover (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0070% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.047% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.013% fail on Suspension rods (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0056% fail on Ball joint dust cover (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0042% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0014% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.0014% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.0014% fail on Axles
      • 0.0014% fail on Stub axle
    • 0.0014% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.0014% fail on Suspension unit
  • 7.8% fail on Brakes (9.8% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Brake performance (34% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Service brake performance (85% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Rbt (83% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance (58% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.088% fail on Plate brake tester (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.045% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.043% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.015% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.015% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.34% fail on Service brake performance (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.018% fail on Plate brake tester (sp) (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.018% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.0056% fail on Service brake performance (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0014% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.54% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (60% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.53% fail on Rbt (sp) (57% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0056% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 0.27% fail on Parking brake performance (56% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Rbt (57% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.23% fail on Parking brake performance (56% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.022% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (60% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.0028% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0070% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0056% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.0014% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.0056% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0056% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.064% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (7.3% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Brake linings and pads (22% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads (22% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.013% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums (28% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs (29% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0028% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.088% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.060% fail on Cable
        • 0.022% fail on Lever
        • 0.0028% fail on Linkage
        • 0.0028% fail on Brake slack adjuster
    • 0.58% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (94% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.29% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.29% fail on Lever
    • 0.25% fail on Hydraulic systems (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Brake fluid (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.0084% fail on Valves
      • 0.0070% fail on Servos (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0014% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.14% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (65% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Anti-lock braking system (56% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0042% fail on Electronic stability control (97% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.097% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.046% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (54% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.028% fail on Rigid brake pipes (95% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.022% fail on Air and vacuum systems (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Servos (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0028% fail on Leaks
    • 0.019% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.013% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.011% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (20 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0014% fail on Other braking system component
      • 0.0070% fail on Other components
    • 0.0014% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 6.7% fail on Visibility (36% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Washers (84% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Wipers
    • 0.21% fail on View to rear (49% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Mirrors (50% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0028% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.14% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.067% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.067% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.0014% fail on Window
    • 0.021% fail on Bonnet (81% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 5.5% fail on Tyres (13% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Tread depth (8.1% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Condition (34% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Size/type (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 5.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (78% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (80% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Spark ignition (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Catalyst emissions (88% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.41% fail on Emissions not tested (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.019% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.011% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.0042% fail on Other emission control equipment (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.0028% fail on NOx sensor
          • 0.0014% fail on Oxygen sensor
        • 0.014% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.53% fail on Compression ignition (56% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (33% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (74% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.038% fail on Emissions not tested (58% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.035% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.013% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0070% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.0028% fail on Particulate filter
          • 0.0014% fail on NOx sensor
          • 0.0014% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
        • 0.013% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.0084% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (63% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Fluid leaks (74% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Engine oil leaks (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.019% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.0097% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.018% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.011% fail on Undertray
      • 0.0070% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 3.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (6.5% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Exhaust system (12% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Transmission (52% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Drive shafts (52% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.54% fail on Joints (52% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0028% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.0014% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.022% fail on Prop shafts (57% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.022% fail on Joints (48% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0028% fail on Belts
      • 0.0014% fail on Chains
    • 0.30% fail on Doors (99% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Front passenger's door (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0028% fail on Catch
      • 0.068% fail on Driver's door (77% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.065% fail on Door condition (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0014% fail on Catch
        • 0.0014% fail on Hinge
      • 0.0070% fail on Other passenger's door (87% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0070% fail on Door condition (87% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Seats (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Passenger's seat (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.091% fail on Driver's seat (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Bumpers (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.079% fail on Body
      • 0.060% fail on Other body component
      • 0.021% fail on Panel
      • 0.0042% fail on Body condition
    • 0.065% fail on Fuel system (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Pipe
      • 0.019% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Tank
      • 0.0042% fail on System (83% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0014% fail on Hose
    • 0.024% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.018% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.0056% fail on Bracket
    • 0.019% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.017% fail on Sub-frame (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.017% fail on Sub-frame condition (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0042% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.011% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.0097% fail on Boot lid condition
      • 0.0014% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.011% fail on Undertray (75% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0070% fail on Chassis
      • 0.0070% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.0014% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.0014% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.0014% fail on Towbar
      • 0.0014% fail on Towbar condition
  • 0.59% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (19% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.32% fail on Condition
      • 0.014% fail on Attachment
      • 0.0097% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.0097% fail on Requirements
      • 0.0042% fail on Pre-tensioners
    • 0.23% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (40% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.022% fail on Airbags
      • 0.017% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.0070% fail on Passengers airbag (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.52% fail on Identification of the vehicle (25% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Registration plates (24% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0042% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.51% fail on Steering (72% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Steering linkage components (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Track rod end (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Ball joint (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0070% fail on Drag link end (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0042% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.0042% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.071% fail on Steering gear (60% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.068% fail on Steering rack (59% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0028% fail on Operation
    • 0.026% fail on Steering play
      • 0.026% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.021% fail on Electronic power steering
    • 0.018% fail on Power steering (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Operation
      • 0.0014% fail on Other components
    • 0.018% fail on Steering column (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0084% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.0084% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.0070% fail on Universal joint
      • 0.0014% fail on Flexible coupling
    • 0.0014% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.21% fail on Road Wheels (47% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Attachment (39% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.045% fail on Condition (63% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.0097% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0056% fail on Anchorages
    • 0.0042% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages