Vauxhall Corsa MOT Results

Registered in 1995
64.1% pass rate
from 351 tests in 2020
(2.1% worse than other 1995 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Corsa is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Suspension (24% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 8.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (78% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Wheel bearings (170% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Springs (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Coil springs (160% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Coil spring (100% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.85% fail on Mounting (15 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.7% fail on Suspension arms (47% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Ball joint dust cover (23% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Ball joint (54% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.57% fail on Anti-roll bars (73% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (3.0% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Stop lamp (32% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim (12% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim (18% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamps (32% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp (31% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.28% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators (55% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type (55% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.85% fail on Individual direction indicators (45% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.85% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (68% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Rear fog lamp (68% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.85% fail on Rear fog lamp (67% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.85% fail on Electrical equipment (47% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Horn (39% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.57% fail on Position lamps (160% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Position lamp (170% worse than other 1995 cars)
  • 12% fail on Visibility (82% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Wipers (75% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Washers (100% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on View to rear (170% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Mirrors (170% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Driver's view
  • 10% fail on Brakes (9.4% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Brake performance (16% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (17% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (22% worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (46% worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (18% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (6.0% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (0.81% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance (20% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (29% better than other 1995 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (43% better than other 1995 cars)
          • 0.57% fail on Service brake imbalance (4.3% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.28% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.28% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.28% fail on Rbt
          • 0.28% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (61% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads (90% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Brake pads (92% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.57% fail on Cable (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.28% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.1% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.85% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.85% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (78% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Hand lever (170% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Pedal
    • 0.28% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.28% fail on Lever
    • 0.28% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.28% fail on Valves
    • 0.28% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.28% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.28% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 10% fail on Body, chassis, structure (2.7% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Exhaust system (63% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Chassis (66% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Chassis condition (67% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure (6.0% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (7.2% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Fuel system (17% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Pipe
      • 0.28% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.57% fail on Seats (21% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Driver's seat (84% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.28% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.28% fail on Transmission
      • 0.28% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.28% fail on Joints
    • 0.28% fail on Doors
      • 0.28% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.28% fail on Door condition
    • 0.28% fail on Floor
  • 6.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (18% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (28% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Spark ignition (25% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Catalyst emissions (29% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.57% fail on Emissions not tested (47% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.28% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.28% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.28% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 1.1% fail on Fluid leaks (52% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Engine oil leaks (97% worse than other 1995 cars)
  • 5.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (56% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Seat belts (72% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Prescribed areas (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Airbags
      • 0.28% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres (26% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Condition (50% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth (18% worse than other 1995 cars)
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle (28% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates (29% worse than other 1995 cars)
  • 1.1% fail on Steering (74% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.85% fail on Steering linkage components (66% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Track rod end (46% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.28% fail on Operation

Search Good Garages