Vauxhall Antara MOT Results

Registered in 2009
59.5% pass rate
from 1,152 tests in 2017
(24% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Antara is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (39% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Position lamps (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 7.4% fail on Front lamps (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.087% fail on All position lamps
    • 6.5% fail on Stop lamp (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.26% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Battery (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.61% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.087% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.087% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.087% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.087% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.087% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.087% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.087% fail on Switch
    • 0.087% fail on Horn
  • 14% fail on Suspension (34% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Suspension arms (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment
    • 4.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (77% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (60% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Linkage condition
    • 3.4% fail on Coil springs
      • 3.4% fail on Condition
    • 2.3% fail on Shock absorbers (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Condition (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Drive shafts
      • 1.5% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 1.5% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.52% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.52% fail on Front
    • 0.35% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.087% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.087% fail on Condition
    • 0.087% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.087% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.087% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.087% fail on Condition
    • 0.087% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.087% fail on Attachment
  • 13% fail on Brakes (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.61% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.35% fail on Parking brake operation (116 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Brake performance not tested (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.087% fail on Gradient hand brake
      • 0.087% fail on Brake operation
    • 4.9% fail on Hub components (77% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Brake pads (78% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on Brake back plates
    • 2.5% fail on Hydraulic systems (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Components (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Pipes (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.087% fail on Hoses
      • 0.087% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Parking brake (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on ABS (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Electronic stability system (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.087% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.087% fail on Linkage
      • 0.087% fail on Clevis joint
  • 6.9% fail on Tyres
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.087% fail on Size/type
    • 0.087% fail on Valve stem
  • 5.6% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 2.8% fail on Wipers
    • 2.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.52% fail on Bonnet (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.26% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Drivers airbag (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.087% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.087% fail on Condition
  • 1.5% fail on Steering
    • 0.95% fail on Steering system
      • 0.61% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.17% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.61% fail on Power steering (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Rams (63 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Other components (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on Operation
      • 0.087% fail on Pump
    • 0.087% fail on Steering operation
  • 1.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.95% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.26% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.26% fail on System
    • 0.17% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.69% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.69% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.087% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.087% fail on Doors
      • 0.087% fail on Passengers front
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages