Vauxhall Antara MOT Results
Registered in 200953.4% pass rate
from 1,082 tests in 2021
(23% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Antara is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Suspension
(33% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(98% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Pins and bushes (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Ball joint
- 0.74% fail on Suspension arm (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (18 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
6.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(61% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (17 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Linkage ball joints (77% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.55% fail on Ball joint
- 0.28% fail on Linkage
- 0.28% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.18% fail on Pins and bushes
-
5.4% fail on
Springs
-
5.4% fail on
Coil springs
- 5.3% fail on Coil spring
- 0.092% fail on Mounting
-
5.4% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.55% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.37% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.092% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.46% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
0.28% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.28% fail on Ball joint
-
0.092% fail on
Axles
- 0.092% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
0.092% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.092% fail on Pins and bushes
-
9.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(98% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
16% fail on
Brakes
(84% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
7.6% fail on
Brake performance
(62% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(180% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (74% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (25 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
-
2.6% fail on
Parking brake performance
(190% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt
(180% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.18% fail on
Decelerometer
(15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Parking brake performance (59 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt
(180% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Service brake performance
(51% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Rbt
(58% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Service brake performance (56% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.18% fail on
Decelerometer
(12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Service brake performance (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Rbt
(58% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
- 0.18% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (37 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.092% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.092% fail on Service brake performance
-
5.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(180% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(86% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(90% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Brake pads (86% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Brake linings
-
1.7% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.7% fail on Brake discs
-
0.46% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Cable
- 0.092% fail on Lever
- 0.092% fail on Clevis joint
-
3.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(90% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Anti-lock braking system (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Electronic stability control (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Parking brake control
(160% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Lever (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.92% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Brake fluid (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.55% fail on Hand lever
- 0.18% fail on Pedal
-
0.092% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.092% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.092% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.092% fail on Other components
-
7.6% fail on
Brake performance
(62% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
16% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(24% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Stop lamp (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.3% fail on Headlamp
- 0.092% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.46% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.3% fail on
Electrical equipment
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Battery(ies) (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Horn
- 0.18% fail on Electrical wiring (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.74% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.74% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.74% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.37% fail on
Direction indicators
(81% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Flashing type
(81% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Individual direction indicators (77% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.37% fail on
Flashing type
(81% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.092% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.092% fail on Position lamp
- 0.092% fail on Rear reflectors
-
8.5% fail on
Visibility
(44% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Wipers
- 3.4% fail on Washers
- 1.2% fail on Bonnet (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.18% fail on Windscreen
-
0.092% fail on
View to rear
- 0.092% fail on Mirrors
-
8.3% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(77% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Exhaust system (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Transmission
(74% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Drive shafts
(62% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Joints (64% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Prop shafts
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Joints
- 0.18% fail on Bearing housing (70 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Prop shaft
-
3.0% fail on
Drive shafts
(62% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.18% fail on Pipe (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.28% fail on
Doors
-
0.18% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.18% fail on Door condition
-
0.18% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.092% fail on Door condition
- 0.092% fail on Catch
-
0.18% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.18% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.18% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.092% fail on
Chassis
- 0.092% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.092% fail on Floor
-
0.092% fail on
Cabs
- 0.092% fail on Prescribed areas
-
8.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(87% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
7.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(83% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.7% fail on
Compression ignition
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.8% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Emissions not tested (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Emission control equipment
(17 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Particulate filter (24 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Other emission control equipment (29 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.18% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
1.9% fail on
Spark ignition
- 1.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.092% fail on Emissions not tested
-
5.7% fail on
Compression ignition
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Fluid leaks
(170% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.28% fail on Other leaks (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
7.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(83% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
7.4% fail on
Tyres
- 4.8% fail on Tread depth
- 3.0% fail on Condition
-
4.0% fail on
Steering
(68% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
(60% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Track rod end
- 0.18% fail on Locking devices (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Drag link end
-
0.74% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.74% fail on Steering rack
-
0.55% fail on
Power steering
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Pipes and hoses (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Rams (42 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Other components (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Operation
-
3.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
(60% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.6% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.18% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.18% fail on Condition
-
0.092% fail on
Airbags
- 0.092% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.37% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.37% fail on Registration plates
-
0.28% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.28% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Vauxhall Antara (2007 - 2015)
Vauxhall version of the Chevrolet Captiva. Reasonably good looking. Improved for 2011 model year.