Vauxhall Agila MOT Results
Registered in 201075.0% pass rate
from 3,756 tests in 2017
(14% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Agila is unusually good or bad.
-
9.8% fail on
Suspension
(21% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Coil springs
(94% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Condition (95% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.027% fail on Location
-
1.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.027% fail on Attachment
-
1.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.93% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.27% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.77% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.77% fail on Condition
- 0.43% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.40% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.21% fail on Rear
- 0.19% fail on Front
-
0.11% fail on
Drive shafts
(86% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Front drive shafts
(86% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Constant velocity joints (86% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Front drive shafts
(86% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.080% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.080% fail on Condition
-
0.027% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.027% fail on Condition
-
6.4% fail on
Coil springs
(94% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
9.6% fail on
Brakes
(71% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Brake performance
(140% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Rear wheels (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance (74% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Front wheels
- 0.40% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.080% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.053% fail on Brake operation
- 0.027% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.0% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Components
(5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Pipes (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Hoses
- 0.053% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.13% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.053% fail on Leaks
-
2.9% fail on
Components
(5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Hub components
(53% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.96% fail on Brake pads (60% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Brake discs
- 0.080% fail on Wheel cylinder (23 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Restricted movement (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Service brake control components
(170% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Pedal
(180% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Anti-slip (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Pedal
(180% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.053% fail on ABS
-
5.3% fail on
Brake performance
(140% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 3.8% fail on Wipers (45% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Washers (35% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Windscreen
- 0.053% fail on Bonnet
- 0.053% fail on Mirrors
-
3.9% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(71% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim (64% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.91% fail on Registration plate lamp (75% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Stop lamp (70% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.59% fail on
Position lamps
(80% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Front lamps (77% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.053% fail on Rear lamps (91% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Headlamps
(88% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Headlamp (88% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.027% fail on Switch
- 0.24% fail on Battery
-
0.24% fail on
Direction indicators
(84% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Flashing type
(84% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Side repeaters (76% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.080% fail on Individual lamps (90% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.027% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.24% fail on
Flashing type
(84% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.16% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.027% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.9% fail on
Tyres
(57% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Tread depth (55% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Condition (61% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Size/type
-
0.69% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(51% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Exhaust system (46% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Emissions
- 0.080% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.027% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.027% fail on Cap
-
0.45% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.29% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.24% fail on Condition
- 0.027% fail on Requirements
- 0.027% fail on Attachment
-
0.16% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.16% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.29% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.24% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.24% fail on Registration plate
-
0.16% fail on
Steering
(84% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Steering system
(88% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.053% fail on Ball joint
- 0.027% fail on Steering rack
- 0.027% fail on Track rod end
- 0.053% fail on Locking devices (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Steering system
(88% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.027% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.027% fail on Condition
-
0.027% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.027% fail on
Doors
- 0.027% fail on Passengers other
-
0.027% fail on
Doors
Read the Honest John Review
-
Vauxhall Agila (2008 - 2014)
Surprisingly spacious small five-door city car. Makes best sense with 1.0 petrol engine. Much better than old Agila. Rebadged version of Suzuki Splash.