Vauxhall Agila MOT Results
Registered in 200056.5% pass rate
from 1,243 tests in 2017
(12% better than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Agila is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(19% better than other 2000 cars)
- 8.1% fail on Registration plate lamp (40% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.8% fail on Front lamps
- 0.80% fail on Rear lamps (58% better than other 2000 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.5% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.64% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.16% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.080% fail on Switch
-
3.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim (56% better than other 2000 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamps
(65% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp (63% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.72% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(58% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Fog lamp (56% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Battery
- 0.16% fail on Horn
- 0.080% fail on Electrical wiring
-
18% fail on
Suspension
(19% better than other 2000 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Suspension arms
(57% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (42% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.080% fail on Attachment
-
3.7% fail on
Wheel bearings
(93% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Rear (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.97% fail on Front
-
3.7% fail on
Drive shafts
-
3.7% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 3.7% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
3.7% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
2.4% fail on
Trailing arms
(4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Condition (69 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.080% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.9% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.8% fail on
Coil springs
(43% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Condition (44% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.080% fail on Location
-
0.56% fail on
Radius arms
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Condition (47 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.40% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(92% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Attachment
- 0.080% fail on Condition
- 0.080% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.24% fail on
Shock absorbers
(85% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Condition (85% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
0.16% fail on
Prescribed areas
(97% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Component mounting (96% better than other 2000 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Suspension arms
(57% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
11% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(64% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
10% fail on
Components
(66% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 8.4% fail on Pipes (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Valves (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Hoses
- 0.72% fail on Leaks
-
10% fail on
Components
(66% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
7.9% fail on
Brake performance
- 3.3% fail on Rear wheels
- 2.3% fail on Front wheels
- 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance (45% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.97% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.080% fail on Brake operation
- 0.080% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.2% fail on
Hub components
- 2.4% fail on Brake pads
- 1.7% fail on Brake discs (96% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.2% fail on Condition
- 0.16% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.080% fail on Electronic stability system
-
0.080% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.080% fail on
Pedal
- 0.080% fail on Condition
-
0.080% fail on
Pedal
-
11% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(64% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
10.0% fail on
Tyres
- 5.1% fail on Condition (39% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Tread depth
- 0.16% fail on Size/type
- 0.16% fail on Valve stem
-
7.5% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.2% fail on Wipers
- 1.9% fail on Washers (47% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Mirrors
- 0.48% fail on Windscreen
- 0.080% fail on Bonnet
-
4.9% fail on
Steering
-
4.8% fail on
Steering system
- 3.2% fail on Track rod end
-
0.64% fail on
Free play
(4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Steering rack
- 0.40% fail on Ball joint
- 0.24% fail on Drag link end
- 0.16% fail on Steering arm
-
0.080% fail on
Power steering
- 0.080% fail on Operation
-
4.8% fail on
Steering system
-
2.2% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(80% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Exhaust system (72% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Emissions (87% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.16% fail on Pipe
- 0.080% fail on Hose
- 0.080% fail on Cap
- 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested (86% better than other 2000 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.4% fail on Registration plate
-
0.48% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(87% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Doors
- 0.24% fail on Passengers other
- 0.16% fail on Passengers front
- 0.080% fail on Drivers
- 0.080% fail on Body condition
-
0.080% fail on
Seats
- 0.080% fail on Drivers
-
0.080% fail on
Load security
- 0.080% fail on Bootlid
-
0.24% fail on
Doors
-
0.32% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(94% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Seat belts
(93% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.080% fail on Requirements
- 0.080% fail on Condition
- 0.080% fail on Attachment
-
0.080% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.080% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.24% fail on
Seat belts
(93% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.24% fail on Condition