Vauxhall Agila MOT Results

Registered in 2000

56.5% pass rate

from 1,243 tests in 2017

(12% better than other 2000 cars)

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Agila is unusually good or bad.

20% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (19% better than other 2000 cars)
- 8.1% fail on Registration plate lamp (40% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Position lamps
  - 5.8% fail on Front lamps
  - 0.80% fail on Rear lamps (58% better than other 2000 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.2% fail on Direction indicators
  - 3.2% fail on Flashing type
    - 2.5% fail on Individual lamps
    - 0.64% fail on Side repeaters
    - 0.16% fail on All direction indicators
    - 0.080% fail on Switch
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim (56% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Headlamps (65% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 1.5% fail on Headlamp (63% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Rear fog lamp (58% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.72% fail on Fog lamp (56% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Battery
- 0.16% fail on Horn
- 0.080% fail on Electrical wiring
18% fail on Suspension (19% better than other 2000 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Suspension arms (57% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 5.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (42% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.88% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.080% fail on Attachment
- 3.7% fail on Wheel bearings (93% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 2.9% fail on Rear (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.97% fail on Front
- 3.7% fail on Drive shafts
  - 3.7% fail on Front drive shafts
    - 3.7% fail on Constant velocity joints
- 2.4% fail on Trailing arms (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 2.3% fail on Condition (69 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.080% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.9% fail on Front suspension joints
- 1.8% fail on Coil springs (43% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 1.7% fail on Condition (44% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.080% fail on Location
- 0.56% fail on Radius arms (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.40% fail on Condition (47 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.16% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.40% fail on Anti-roll bars (92% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.32% fail on Attachment
  - 0.080% fail on Condition
  - 0.080% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.24% fail on Shock absorbers (85% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.24% fail on Condition (85% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
- 0.16% fail on Prescribed areas (97% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.16% fail on Component mounting (96% better than other 2000 cars)
17% fail on Brakes
- 11% fail on Hydraulic systems (64% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 10% fail on Components (66% worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 8.4% fail on Pipes (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 1.7% fail on Valves (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 1.0% fail on Hoses
  - 0.72% fail on Leaks
- 7.9% fail on Brake performance
  - 3.3% fail on Rear wheels
  - 2.3% fail on Front wheels
  - 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance (45% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
  - 0.97% fail on Brake imbalance
  - 0.080% fail on Brake operation
  - 0.080% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 3.2% fail on Hub components
  - 2.4% fail on Brake pads
  - 1.7% fail on Brake discs (96% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Parking brake
  - 1.2% fail on Condition
- 0.16% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.080% fail on Electronic stability system
- 0.080% fail on Service brake control components
  - 0.080% fail on Pedal
    - 0.080% fail on Condition
10.0% fail on Tyres
- 5.1% fail on Condition (39% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Tread depth
- 0.16% fail on Size/type
- 0.16% fail on Valve stem
7.5% fail on Driver's view of the road
- 5.2% fail on Wipers
- 1.9% fail on Washers (47% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Mirrors
- 0.48% fail on Windscreen
- 0.080% fail on Bonnet
4.9% fail on Steering
- 4.8% fail on Steering system
  - 3.2% fail on Track rod end
  - 0.64% fail on Free play (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 0.64% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.48% fail on Steering rack
  - 0.40% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.24% fail on Drag link end
  - 0.16% fail on Steering arm
- 0.080% fail on Power steering
  - 0.080% fail on Operation
2.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (80% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Exhaust system (72% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Emissions (87% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.16% fail on Pipe
  - 0.080% fail on Hose
  - 0.080% fail on Cap
- 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested (86% better than other 2000 cars)
1.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN
- 1.4% fail on Registration plate
0.48% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (87% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Doors
  - 0.24% fail on Passengers other
  - 0.16% fail on Passengers front
  - 0.080% fail on Drivers
- 0.080% fail on Body condition
- 0.080% fail on Seats
  - 0.080% fail on Drivers
- 0.080% fail on Load security
  - 0.080% fail on Bootlid
0.32% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (94% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Seat belts (93% better than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.080% fail on Requirements
  - 0.080% fail on Condition
  - 0.080% fail on Attachment
- 0.080% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
  - 0.080% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
0.24% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.24% fail on Condition