Vauxhall Agila MOT Results

Registered in 2000
54.3% pass rate
from 923 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Agila is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.54% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.11% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.8% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps (56% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp (66% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.11% fail on Dipswitch
    • 1.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.11% fail on Switch
    • 0.54% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.43% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.11% fail on Horn
  • 19% fail on Brakes (27% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 9.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.8% fail on Rbt
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.11% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.11% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.11% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.11% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.43% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 7.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.11% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.54% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.54% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.1% fail on Load sensing valves (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.54% fail on Lever
    • 0.43% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.22% fail on Pedal
      • 0.22% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.33% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.22% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.22% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.11% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.11% fail on Valves
    • 0.22% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Suspension arms (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Ball joint (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Suspension arm (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Pins and bushes (85% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.8% fail on Springs
      • 1.8% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.6% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.22% fail on Mounting
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (76% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.87% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.76% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.65% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.43% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (91% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Axles
      • 0.11% fail on Axle
    • 0.11% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 8.1% fail on Tyres
    • 4.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.43% fail on Size/type
  • 8.0% fail on Visibility
    • 6.1% fail on Wipers
    • 1.6% fail on Washers (53% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on View to rear
      • 0.65% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.22% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.22% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.22% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.11% fail on Driver's view
  • 6.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure (45% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Transmission
      • 3.9% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.9% fail on Joints
      • 0.11% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.11% fail on Joints
    • 0.98% fail on Exhaust system (76% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Doors
      • 0.33% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.33% fail on Door condition
      • 0.11% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
      • 0.11% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
    • 0.33% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.11% fail on Tank
      • 0.11% fail on Hose
      • 0.11% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.22% fail on Chassis (80% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.11% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.22% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.22% fail on Body
      • 0.22% fail on Other body component
    • 0.11% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.11% fail on Engine mounting condition
  • 5.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (45% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust emissions (57% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Spark ignition (55% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.76% fail on Catalyst emissions (87% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.11% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.11% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Fluid leaks (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Engine oil leaks (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 3.7% fail on Steering
    • 2.9% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.65% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.33% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.33% fail on Steering play
      • 0.33% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.22% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.22% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.11% fail on Power steering
      • 0.11% fail on Operation
    • 0.11% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.54% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.54% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.54% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (88% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Seat belts (81% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Condition
      • 0.22% fail on Requirements
  • 0.22% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment
  • 0.11% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.11% fail on Speedometer

Search Good Garages