TVR Chimaera MOT Results
Registered in 199680.6% pass rate
from 325 tests in 2021
(48% better than other 1996 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the TVR Chimaera is unusually good or bad.
-
8.0% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(40% better than other 1996 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.8% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.92% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.31% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.2% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.92% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.92% fail on Headlamp
-
0.31% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.31% fail on Switch
-
0.31% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.31% fail on Horn
-
4.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
4.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.6% fail on
Spark ignition
- 3.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.92% fail on Emissions not tested
-
4.6% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.31% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.31% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
4.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.3% fail on
Visibility
- 3.7% fail on Washers
- 1.2% fail on Wipers
-
0.31% fail on
View to rear
- 0.31% fail on Mirrors
-
4.0% fail on
Brakes
(64% better than other 1996 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Brake performance
(56% better than other 1996 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
- 0.92% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.31% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
-
0.62% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.62% fail on
Rbt
- 0.62% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.62% fail on
Rbt
- 0.31% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.31% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.31% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.31% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.31% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.8% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
0.62% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.31% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.31% fail on Brake pads
-
0.31% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.31% fail on Brake discs
-
0.31% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.31% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.31% fail on Pedal
-
0.31% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.31% fail on Servos
-
0.31% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.31% fail on Lever
-
0.31% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.31% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.31% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
3.1% fail on
Brake performance
(56% better than other 1996 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Steering
-
1.5% fail on
Steering gear
- 1.5% fail on Steering rack
-
0.92% fail on
Power steering
- 0.92% fail on Other components (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.31% fail on
Other components
- 0.31% fail on Steering linkage
-
0.31% fail on
Other components
-
1.5% fail on
Steering gear
-
2.8% fail on
Suspension
(77% better than other 1996 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.92% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.31% fail on Suspension arm
-
0.92% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.62% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.31% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
-
0.31% fail on
Springs
-
0.31% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.31% fail on Coil spring
-
0.31% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.31% fail on Shock absorbers
-
1.2% fail on
Suspension arms
-
1.5% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.5% fail on Registration plates
-
0.92% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(90% better than other 1996 cars)
-
0.62% fail on
Chassis
- 0.62% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.31% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.62% fail on
Chassis
-
0.62% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(84% better than other 1996 cars)
-
0.62% fail on
Seat belts
(81% better than other 1996 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Condition
-
0.62% fail on
Seat belts
(81% better than other 1996 cars)