Toyota Yaris MOT Results
Registered in 201687.1% pass rate
from 28,732 tests in 2021
(22% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Yaris is unusually good or bad.
-
4.4% fail on
Visibility
(12% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Wipers (20% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Washers
-
0.056% fail on
View to rear
- 0.056% fail on Mirrors
-
0.038% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.038% fail on Windscreen
- 0.010% fail on Driver's view
-
4.2% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(19% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Direction indicators
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Flashing type
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Individual direction indicators (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.010% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.5% fail on
Flashing type
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
(26% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Headlamp aim (28% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.69% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.67% fail on Headlamp
- 0.014% fail on Dipswitch (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0035% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.45% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(140% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(140% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Rear fog lamp (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(140% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Reversing lamps
(8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Reversing lamps (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0035% fail on Reversing lamp switch
- 0.23% fail on Stop lamp (63% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (46% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.024% fail on
Electrical equipment
(64% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.0070% fail on Horn (83% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0035% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.0035% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.0035% fail on Position lamp
-
0.0035% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.0035% fail on Switch
- 0.0035% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.0035% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.0035% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
1.5% fail on
Direction indicators
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Tyres
(41% better than other 2016 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Condition (44% better than other 2016 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Tread depth (41% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.066% fail on Size/type
-
1.5% fail on
Brakes
(48% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.93% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(51% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.55% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(65% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Brake pads (65% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.47% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.47% fail on Brake discs
-
0.0070% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.0070% fail on Cable
-
0.55% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(65% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.58% fail on
Brake performance
(21% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.42% fail on
Rbt
- 0.32% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.12% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.017% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.017% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0035% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.0035% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.42% fail on
Rbt
-
0.087% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(62% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.087% fail on Rbt (sp) (61% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.080% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.077% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.049% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.028% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.0035% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.0035% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.077% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.021% fail on
Parking brake performance
(79% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.021% fail on
Rbt
(78% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Parking brake performance (79% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0035% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.021% fail on
Rbt
(78% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.45% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.042% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.028% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.021% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.028% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.021% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.0070% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.021% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.014% fail on
Parking brake control
(88% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Lever (85% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.010% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(87% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0070% fail on Pedal (80% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0035% fail on Hand lever
-
0.93% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(51% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.88% fail on
Suspension
(58% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Wheel bearings (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Springs
(83% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Coil springs
(83% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Coil spring (83% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Coil springs
(83% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Suspension arms
(79% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.084% fail on Pins and bushes (66% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Ball joint (91% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0035% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.090% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.035% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(83% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (70% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.0035% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.0035% fail on Linkage
- 0.0035% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
-
0.010% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.0070% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.0035% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.0035% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.0035% fail on Macpherson strut
-
0.0035% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.0035% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.0035% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.0035% fail on Ball joint
-
0.22% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(60% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.084% fail on Bumpers (200% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.073% fail on
Body
(160% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.063% fail on Other body component (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Panel
-
0.021% fail on
Transmission
(90% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.017% fail on
Drive shafts
(91% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Joints (91% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0035% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.0035% fail on Joints
-
0.017% fail on
Drive shafts
(91% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.010% fail on
Doors
-
0.0070% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.0035% fail on Door condition
- 0.0035% fail on Hinge
-
0.0035% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.0035% fail on Door condition
-
0.0070% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.010% fail on
Seats
- 0.010% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.0070% fail on
Fuel system
(83% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0035% fail on Tank
- 0.0035% fail on Pipe
-
0.0035% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.0035% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.0035% fail on
Chassis
- 0.0035% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.0035% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.0035% fail on Undertray
-
0.13% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(56% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.10% fail on Condition
- 0.0070% fail on Requirements
- 0.014% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (88% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.097% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(54% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.094% fail on Registration plates (56% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0035% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
0.066% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(92% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.059% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(93% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.052% fail on
Spark ignition
(89% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.028% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (91% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Catalyst emissions (90% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.0070% fail on
Compression ignition
(98% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0035% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
- 0.0035% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.052% fail on
Spark ignition
(89% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0070% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.0035% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.0035% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
0.059% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(93% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.042% fail on
Road Wheels
(78% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Attachment (75% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0035% fail on Condition
- 0.0035% fail on Hubs
-
0.021% fail on
Steering
(92% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.014% fail on
Steering linkage components
(94% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Locking devices
- 0.0035% fail on Track rod end
-
0.0070% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.0070% fail on Steering rack
-
0.014% fail on
Steering linkage components
(94% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0035% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.0035% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review
-
Toyota Yaris (2011 - 2020)
Fairly big boot by class standards, tempting hybrid option, Toyota has an epic reliability record.