MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Yaris » 2010

Toyota Yaris MOT Results

Registered in 2010
66.9% pass rate
from 19,506 tests in 2021
(11% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Yaris is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 9.7% fail on Springs (78% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 9.7% fail on Coil springs (78% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 9.6% fail on Coil spring (79% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.010% fail on Mounting
    • 2.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (35% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.66% fail on Ball joint dust cover (30% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Linkage ball joints (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.082% fail on Ball joint (75% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.010% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.010% fail on Linkage (96% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0051% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 1.7% fail on Suspension arms (58% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes (24% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover (55% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Suspension arm (53% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.27% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Shock absorbers (71% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.062% fail on Sub-frames (72% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.026% fail on Sub-frame (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0051% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.056% fail on Macpherson strut (65% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.0051% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0051% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0051% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.051% fail on Other suspension component (78% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Ball joint (75% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.010% fail on Pins and bushes (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.010% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0051% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.010% fail on Suspension rods (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.010% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.0051% fail on Axles
      • 0.0051% fail on Axle
  • 8.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (28% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (70% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.056% fail on Headlamp levelling device (64% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim (19% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim (19% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.48% fail on Direction indicators (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Flashing type (77% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Individual direction indicators (85% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Switch (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.097% fail on Side repeaters (87% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.067% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.26% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.26% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.23% fail on Stop lamp (92% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Electrical equipment (44% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.077% fail on Horn (57% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Rear fog lamp (77% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Rear fog lamp (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.087% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.077% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.010% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.015% fail on Rear reflectors (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.015% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.010% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.0051% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 6.4% fail on Visibility (20% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Wipers (84% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Washers (34% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on View to rear
      • 0.14% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.0051% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.062% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.062% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.021% fail on Bonnet (85% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.010% fail on Driver's view
  • 6.0% fail on Brakes (24% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Brake performance (33% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.53% fail on Service brake imbalance (36% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.026% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.026% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0051% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0051% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.56% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (69% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.56% fail on Rbt (sp) (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (49% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Rbt (sp) (51% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.23% fail on Service brake imbalance (48% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.056% fail on Service brake performance (66% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Plate brake tester (sp) (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.015% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.0051% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.19% fail on Parking brake performance (76% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Rbt (75% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.16% fail on Parking brake performance (76% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.031% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.082% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (51% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (49% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Brake pads (49% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0051% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.51% fail on Brake discs and drums (55% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.50% fail on Brake discs (55% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0051% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.015% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (85% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0051% fail on Cable
        • 0.0051% fail on Lever
        • 0.0051% fail on Brake slack adjuster
    • 0.22% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (63% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Anti-lock braking system (54% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.056% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.046% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.087% fail on Parking brake control (75% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on Lever (72% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.056% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (83% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on Hand lever (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Pedal (89% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.051% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.021% fail on Hydraulic systems (78% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.010% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.010% fail on Brake fluid (84% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.015% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.010% fail on Other components
      • 0.0051% fail on Additional braking device
  • 3.6% fail on Tyres (41% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth (42% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Condition (44% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Size/type
  • 3.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.7% fail on Spark ignition (31% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (65% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.36% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.031% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.55% fail on Compression ignition (56% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (40% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.092% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (81% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.026% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.026% fail on Emissions not tested (78% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.015% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    • 0.031% fail on Fluid leaks (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Engine oil leaks (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0051% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.0051% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.015% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.015% fail on Undertray
  • 2.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (49% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust system (25% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Transmission (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Drive shafts (86% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Joints (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.010% fail on Prop shafts (85% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.010% fail on Joints (80% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Bumpers (86% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.10% fail on Tank (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on Pipe
      • 0.0051% fail on Hose
      • 0.0051% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.11% fail on Body
      • 0.092% fail on Other body component
      • 0.015% fail on Panel
    • 0.062% fail on Doors (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.041% fail on Door condition
        • 0.0051% fail on Catch
      • 0.015% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.010% fail on Door condition
        • 0.0051% fail on Hinge
    • 0.056% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.056% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.015% fail on Chassis
      • 0.015% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.010% fail on Undertray
    • 0.0051% fail on Towbar
      • 0.0051% fail on Towbar condition
    • 0.0051% fail on Load security
      • 0.0051% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.0051% fail on Tailgate condition
  • 0.61% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (33% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.47% fail on Condition
      • 0.036% fail on Requirements
      • 0.015% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.015% fail on Attachment
    • 0.082% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (83% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.39% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.39% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.16% fail on Road Wheels (66% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Attachment (60% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.021% fail on Condition (82% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.14% fail on Steering (94% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.097% fail on Steering linkage components (95% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Track rod end (97% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.021% fail on Ball joint (74% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.036% fail on Steering gear (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Steering rack (89% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0051% fail on Operation
    • 0.0051% fail on Power steering
      • 0.0051% fail on Operation
    • 0.0051% fail on Steering play
      • 0.0051% fail on Steering rack
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages