Toyota Yaris MOT Results
Registered in 201078.6% pass rate
from 17,063 tests in 2017
(27% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Yaris is unusually good or bad.
-
7.6% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(43% better than other 2010 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim (33% better than other 2010 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp (42% better than other 2010 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Headlamps
(14% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp
- 0.0059% fail on Dipswitch
-
1.8% fail on
Position lamps
(38% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Rear lamps (96% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Front lamps (68% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.012% fail on All position lamps
-
0.23% fail on
Direction indicators
(85% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Flashing type
(85% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Individual lamps (87% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.076% fail on Side repeaters (86% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.029% fail on All direction indicators (80% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.029% fail on Switch
- 0.012% fail on Tell tales
-
0.23% fail on
Flashing type
(85% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Stop lamp (93% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Horn (54% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Battery
- 0.064% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.047% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(87% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.047% fail on Fog lamp (87% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0059% fail on Tell tale
- 0.012% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.012% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.0059% fail on Lamp
- 0.0059% fail on Switch
-
6.5% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(36% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Wipers (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Washers (45% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Windscreen
- 0.20% fail on Mirrors (70% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Suspension
(40% better than other 2010 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.5% fail on Condition
- 0.012% fail on Location
-
0.50% fail on
Suspension arms
(61% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (61% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Attachment
-
0.43% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(73% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (73% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (70% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Linkage condition (71% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.38% fail on Rear (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Front (80% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Shock absorbers
(88% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Condition (88% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.059% fail on Front suspension joints (83% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.047% fail on
Drive shafts
(94% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.047% fail on
Front drive shafts
(94% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.047% fail on Constant velocity joints (94% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.047% fail on
Front drive shafts
(94% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.018% fail on
Macpherson strut
(84% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Condition (84% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.012% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.012% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.012% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.012% fail on Condition
- 0.012% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
0.0059% fail on
Fluid suspension
- 0.0059% fail on Suspension unit
-
0.0059% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.0059% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
3.5% fail on
Coil springs
-
3.9% fail on
Tyres
(43% better than other 2010 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Condition (40% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Tread depth (50% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Valve stem (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.094% fail on Size/type
-
3.1% fail on
Brakes
(45% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Hub components
(50% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads (48% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Brake discs (64% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.018% fail on Brake back plates
- 0.012% fail on Brake linings
-
0.93% fail on
Brake performance
(57% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Front wheels
- 0.32% fail on Brake imbalance (51% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Rear wheels (86% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.076% fail on Parking brake performance (90% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Service brake performance (77% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0059% fail on Brake operation
- 0.0059% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.76% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(39% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Components
(80% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Pipes (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Hoses
- 0.0059% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.012% fail on Leaks
- 0.0059% fail on Operation
-
0.75% fail on
Components
(80% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.11% fail on ABS (44% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.029% fail on Restricted movement (73% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.023% fail on
Parking brake
(93% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Condition (93% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.0059% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.0059% fail on
Pedal
- 0.0059% fail on Condition
-
0.0059% fail on
Pedal
-
0.0059% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.0059% fail on Cable
- 0.0059% fail on Locking devices
-
1.4% fail on
Hub components
(50% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(69% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Exhaust system (74% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Emissions
- 0.064% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.018% fail on
Fuel system
(91% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0059% fail on Hose
- 0.0059% fail on Pipe
- 0.0059% fail on System
-
0.42% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.42% fail on Registration plate
-
0.34% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(37% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.28% fail on Condition
- 0.035% fail on Requirements
- 0.012% fail on Attachment
-
0.018% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(94% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.018% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (93% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.19% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(43% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.094% fail on Body condition
-
0.076% fail on
Doors
- 0.041% fail on Passengers front
- 0.035% fail on Passengers other
-
0.012% fail on
Seats
(82% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Passengers
- 0.0059% fail on Body security
-
0.088% fail on
Road Wheels
(71% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.076% fail on Attachment (60% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.012% fail on Condition (89% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.059% fail on
Steering
(94% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.053% fail on
Steering system
(94% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Track rod end (97% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.012% fail on
Free play
- 0.012% fail on Steering rack
- 0.012% fail on Steering rack (91% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0059% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0059% fail on Drag link end
-
0.0059% fail on
Power steering
- 0.0059% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.053% fail on
Steering system
(94% better than other 2010 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Toyota Yaris (2006 - 2011)
More room and better handling than the previous version. Excellent crash test rating. 1.4 D-4D does 50mpg +.