MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Verso » 2016

Toyota Verso MOT Results

Registered in 2016
82.2% pass rate
from 3,610 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Verso is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.7% fail on Visibility (43% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Wipers (67% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.055% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.055% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.2% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.80% fail on Individual direction indicators (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.083% fail on All direction indicators (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.83% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.78% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.055% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.69% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (99% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Stop lamp (60% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.17% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.17% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.11% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.055% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.055% fail on Horn
    • 0.083% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.083% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.055% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.028% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.028% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.055% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 3.9% fail on Tyres
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.083% fail on Size/type
  • 2.7% fail on Brakes
    • 2.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.44% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.44% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.39% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.28% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.28% fail on Rbt
          • 0.25% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.028% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.083% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.083% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.028% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.028% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.028% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.028% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.028% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.028% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.11% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.11% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.11% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.11% fail on Lever
    • 0.083% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.083% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.028% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.055% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.028% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.028% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 0.58% fail on Suspension (72% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Suspension arms (61% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.055% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.028% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.14% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.11% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.083% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.028% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.083% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.055% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.028% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.028% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.028% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 0.58% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (100% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
      • 0.028% fail on Attachment
    • 0.25% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.33% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.14% fail on Seats (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.083% fail on Passenger's seat (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.055% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.055% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.055% fail on Body
      • 0.055% fail on Other body component
    • 0.028% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.028% fail on Transmission
      • 0.028% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.028% fail on Joints
    • 0.028% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.028% fail on Other boot lid component
  • 0.33% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (60% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Exhaust emissions (69% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.11% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.055% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.083% fail on Spark ignition (82% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.055% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.055% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (81% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.055% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.055% fail on Engine oil leaks
    • 0.028% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.028% fail on Undertray
  • 0.083% fail on Steering
    • 0.083% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.028% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.028% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.028% fail on Steering arm
  • 0.055% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.055% fail on Attachment
  • 0.028% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.028% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

  • Toyota Verso (2013 - 2018)
    Solid build quality and a five-year warranty, spacious cabin with flexible seating for seven, BMW 1.6 D-4D engine from 2014, good reliability record.

    Search Good Garages