Toyota Verso MOT Results
Registered in 201071.7% pass rate
from 3,228 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Verso is unusually good or bad.
-
19% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(40% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Position lamps
(110% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Rear lamps (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Front lamps
- 0.062% fail on All position lamps
- 5.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (53% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim (35% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Direction indicators
(130% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Flashing type
(130% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Individual lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.40% fail on All direction indicators (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Side repeaters (66% better than other 2010 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Flashing type
(130% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.7% fail on Headlamp
- 0.031% fail on Matched pair
- 0.93% fail on Horn (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Stop lamp (85% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Battery
-
0.093% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(74% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.093% fail on Fog lamp (74% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.093% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.062% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.031% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.031% fail on Lamp
-
6.4% fail on
Position lamps
(110% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(29% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Wipers (65% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Washers
- 0.46% fail on Windscreen
- 0.19% fail on Mirrors
- 0.031% fail on Bonnet
-
5.4% fail on
Tyres
(20% better than other 2010 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Condition
- 2.5% fail on Tread depth (29% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Size/type
- 0.093% fail on Valve stem
-
4.2% fail on
Brakes
(25% better than other 2010 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Hub components
- 2.3% fail on Brake pads
- 0.46% fail on Brake discs
- 0.062% fail on Brake calipers
-
0.77% fail on
Brake performance
(64% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Rear wheels (61% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Parking brake performance (63% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Front wheels (66% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.031% fail on Brake operation
-
0.53% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
0.46% fail on
Components
- 0.43% fail on Pipes
- 0.031% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.062% fail on Leaks
-
0.46% fail on
Components
-
0.28% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.28% fail on Condition
- 0.25% fail on Electronic stability system (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.093% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.031% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.031% fail on Cable
- 0.031% fail on ABS
-
2.6% fail on
Hub components
-
1.4% fail on
Suspension
(82% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(79% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (85% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.031% fail on Linkage condition
-
0.34% fail on
Drive shafts
(55% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Front drive shafts
(54% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Constant velocity joints (54% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Front drive shafts
(54% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Coil springs
(92% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Condition (92% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Shock absorbers
(77% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Condition (77% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Suspension arms
(85% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (85% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.093% fail on Front suspension joints (73% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.031% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.031% fail on Attachment
-
0.031% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.031% fail on Rear
-
0.031% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.031% fail on Component mounting
-
0.34% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(79% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.96% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(78% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.84% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.71% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Drivers airbag (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.062% fail on Condition
- 0.031% fail on Requirements
- 0.031% fail on Attachment
-
0.84% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.46% fail on Registration plate
-
0.31% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(78% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Exhaust system (70% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Emissions
-
0.28% fail on
Steering
(73% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Steering system
(80% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Track rod end (77% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.031% fail on
Free play
- 0.031% fail on Steering rack
- 0.062% fail on Locking devices (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Steering operation
-
0.19% fail on
Steering system
(80% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.15% fail on Body condition
- 0.062% fail on Body security (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.062% fail on
Seats
- 0.031% fail on Passengers
- 0.031% fail on Drivers
-
0.12% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.093% fail on Attachment
- 0.031% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review
-
Toyota Verso (2009 - 2013)
Compact seven seater. Excellent Valvematic 1.8 petrol engine with smooth seven-ratio CVT gives 40+ mpg. Good reliability record.