Toyota Verso MOT Results

Registered in 2010
66.3% pass rate
from 3,725 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Verso is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (37% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Direction indicators (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Flashing type (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Individual direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on All direction indicators (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Side repeaters (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Position lamps (93% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Position lamp (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on All position lamps (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim (29% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim (37% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.5% fail on Electrical equipment (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Horn (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.32% fail on Stop lamp (89% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.32% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.27% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.27% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.27% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.027% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.027% fail on Switch
    • 0.027% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 7.0% fail on Visibility (41% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers (82% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.30% fail on View to rear
      • 0.27% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.027% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.21% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.13% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.13% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.13% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.6% fail on Brakes
    • 2.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.72% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.72% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.6% fail on Brake performance (48% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.91% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.59% fail on Service brake performance (65% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.59% fail on Rbt (64% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.40% fail on Service brake performance (71% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.59% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.56% fail on Rbt
          • 0.51% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.081% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.027% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.027% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.11% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (75% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Rbt (sp) (75% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.081% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.027% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.027% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.40% fail on Electronic stability control (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.38% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.38% fail on Lever
    • 0.19% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.19% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.13% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.027% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.027% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.027% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 5.6% fail on Tyres
    • 3.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Size/type
  • 3.7% fail on Suspension (66% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (54% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.19% fail on Linkage ball joints (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.027% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.027% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.027% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.89% fail on Springs (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Coil springs (77% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.89% fail on Coil spring (77% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.83% fail on Suspension arms (74% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Pins and bushes (60% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.38% fail on Shock absorbers (72% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.11% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.054% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.054% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.054% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.027% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.027% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.054% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.027% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.027% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.054% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.027% fail on Axles
      • 0.027% fail on Axle
  • 1.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.40% fail on Condition
      • 0.027% fail on Requirements
    • 0.054% fail on Airbags
      • 0.054% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.027% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 1.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure (46% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Transmission (41% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Drive shafts (41% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.67% fail on Joints (40% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.027% fail on Joints
    • 0.30% fail on Exhaust system (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.16% fail on Body
      • 0.16% fail on Other body component
    • 0.16% fail on Undertray (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Integral vehicle structure (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Sub-frame (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.027% fail on Sub-frame condition
        • 0.027% fail on Strengthening plate
      • 0.054% fail on Strengthening plate (154 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.054% fail on Seats
      • 0.054% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.027% fail on Chassis
      • 0.027% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.027% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.027% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.027% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.027% fail on Bracket
    • 0.027% fail on Doors
      • 0.027% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.027% fail on Door condition
  • 0.99% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (65% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Exhaust emissions (64% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Compression ignition (47% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (49% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.081% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.027% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 0.32% fail on Spark ignition (78% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (69% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.054% fail on Catalyst emissions (92% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.027% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.027% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.027% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.62% fail on Steering (66% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Steering linkage components (65% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Track rod end (72% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Locking devices (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.027% fail on Intermediate drop arm
    • 0.027% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.027% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.027% fail on Steering column
    • 0.027% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.51% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.51% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.16% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.16% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Toyota Verso (2009 - 2013)
    Compact seven seater. Excellent Valvematic 1.8 petrol engine with smooth seven-ratio CVT gives 40+ mpg. Good reliability record.

    Search Good Garages