MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Verso » 2010

Toyota Verso MOT Results

Registered in 2010
65.4% pass rate
from 3,459 tests in 2021
(10% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Verso is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (18% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (98% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Direction indicators (76% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Flashing type (76% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Individual direction indicators (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on All direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Side repeaters (64% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.17% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.058% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.6% fail on Electrical equipment (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Horn (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.029% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.029% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.55% fail on Stop lamp (81% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.40% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.029% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.35% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.32% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.32% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.029% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.029% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 0.087% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.087% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.087% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 7.5% fail on Brakes
    • 3.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.2% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.029% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.0% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.5% fail on Brake performance (38% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.84% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.81% fail on Rbt
          • 0.75% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.058% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.029% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.029% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.78% fail on Service brake performance (61% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.75% fail on Rbt (62% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.58% fail on Service brake performance (66% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.029% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.029% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.14% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.14% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (74% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Rbt (sp) (74% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake imbalance (67% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.029% fail on Service brake performance
    • 2.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.38% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.23% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.029% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.52% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.43% fail on Hand lever (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on Pedal
    • 0.38% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.38% fail on Lever
    • 0.087% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.087% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.087% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.058% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.058% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.029% fail on Hand operated control valves
      • 0.029% fail on Condition
  • 7.1% fail on Visibility (33% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers (56% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.23% fail on View to rear
      • 0.23% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.20% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.087% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.087% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.029% fail on Driver's view
  • 7.0% fail on Suspension (47% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (55% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage ball joints (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.058% fail on Linkage
      • 0.058% fail on Ball joint (82% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.029% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 2.4% fail on Springs (56% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Coil springs (57% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Coil spring (58% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.029% fail on Mounting
      • 0.058% fail on Torsion bars (154 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.058% fail on Torsion bar (232 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Suspension arms (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Pins and bushes (53% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint (92% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.23% fail on Other suspension component (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.029% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.32% fail on Shock absorbers (62% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.14% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.058% fail on Suspension rod (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.029% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.087% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.058% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.029% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.087% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.058% fail on Axles
      • 0.058% fail on Axle (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.029% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.029% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 5.4% fail on Tyres
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.20% fail on Size/type
  • 1.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure (52% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Transmission (63% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Drive shafts (62% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.58% fail on Joints (61% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Bumpers (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Exhaust system (85% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Body
      • 0.14% fail on Other body component
      • 0.058% fail on Panel
    • 0.14% fail on Undertray (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.058% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.029% fail on Pipe
      • 0.029% fail on System
    • 0.12% fail on Seats
      • 0.058% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.058% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.058% fail on Chassis
      • 0.058% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.029% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.029% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.029% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.029% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 1.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (74% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.20% fail on Condition
      • 0.029% fail on Attachment
    • 0.087% fail on Airbags (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.029% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 1.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (71% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.95% fail on Exhaust emissions (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Spark ignition (70% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.46% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (52% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.087% fail on Emissions not tested (73% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.029% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.029% fail on Oxygen sensor
        • 0.029% fail on Catalyst emissions
      • 0.35% fail on Compression ignition (72% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (68% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (76% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.058% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.058% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.058% fail on Undertray
    • 0.029% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.029% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.75% fail on Identification of the vehicle (79% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Registration plates (79% worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.66% fail on Steering (72% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Steering linkage components (65% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Track rod end (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on Locking devices (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.029% fail on Other components
        • 0.029% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.087% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.087% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.52% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.49% fail on Attachment
    • 0.058% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • Toyota Verso (2009 - 2013)
    Compact seven seater. Excellent Valvematic 1.8 petrol engine with smooth seven-ratio CVT gives 40+ mpg. Good reliability record.

    Search Good Garages