Toyota Verso MOT Results

Registered in 2010
71.7% pass rate
from 3,228 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Verso is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (40% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Position lamps (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Rear lamps (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.062% fail on All position lamps
    • 5.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (53% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim (35% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Direction indicators (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Flashing type (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Individual lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on All direction indicators (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Side repeaters (66% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.031% fail on Matched pair
    • 0.93% fail on Horn (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Stop lamp (85% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Battery
    • 0.093% fail on Rear fog lamp (74% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Fog lamp (74% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.093% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.062% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.031% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.031% fail on Lamp
  • 6.1% fail on Driver's view of the road (29% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers (65% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.46% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.19% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.031% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.4% fail on Tyres (20% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Condition
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth (29% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Size/type
    • 0.093% fail on Valve stem
  • 4.2% fail on Brakes (25% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Hub components
      • 2.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.46% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.062% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.77% fail on Brake performance (64% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Rear wheels (61% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Parking brake performance (63% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Front wheels (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.031% fail on Brake operation
    • 0.53% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.46% fail on Components
        • 0.43% fail on Pipes
        • 0.031% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.062% fail on Leaks
    • 0.28% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.28% fail on Condition
    • 0.25% fail on Electronic stability system (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.093% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.031% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.031% fail on Cable
    • 0.031% fail on ABS
  • 1.4% fail on Suspension (82% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Anti-roll bars (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.031% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.34% fail on Drive shafts (55% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Front drive shafts (54% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Constant velocity joints (54% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Coil springs (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Condition (92% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Shock absorbers (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Condition (77% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Suspension arms (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (85% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.093% fail on Front suspension joints (73% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.031% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.031% fail on Attachment
    • 0.031% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.031% fail on Rear
    • 0.031% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.031% fail on Component mounting
  • 0.96% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (78% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.84% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Drivers airbag (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.062% fail on Condition
      • 0.031% fail on Requirements
      • 0.031% fail on Attachment
  • 0.46% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.46% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.31% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Exhaust system (70% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.031% fail on Emissions
  • 0.28% fail on Steering (73% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Steering system (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Track rod end (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Free play
        • 0.031% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.062% fail on Locking devices (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.031% fail on Steering operation
  • 0.28% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.15% fail on Body condition
    • 0.062% fail on Body security (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.062% fail on Seats
      • 0.031% fail on Passengers
      • 0.031% fail on Drivers
  • 0.12% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.093% fail on Attachment
    • 0.031% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • Toyota Verso (2009 - 2013)
    Compact seven seater. Excellent Valvematic 1.8 petrol engine with smooth seven-ratio CVT gives 40+ mpg. Good reliability record.

    Search Good Garages