MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Verso » 2009

Toyota Verso MOT Results

Registered in 2009
67.0% pass rate
from 2,166 tests in 2021
(21% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Verso is unusually good or bad.

  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.23% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.3% fail on Individual direction indicators (89% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Side repeaters (74% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.046% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.74% fail on Stop lamp (79% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.46% fail on Horn (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.28% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.28% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.28% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.14% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.14% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.14% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.14% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.046% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.092% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 7.5% fail on Brakes
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.60% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.60% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.046% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.046% fail on Lever
    • 2.4% fail on Brake performance (49% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 0.97% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.092% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.046% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.046% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.046% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.46% fail on Service brake performance (81% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.46% fail on Rbt (81% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.46% fail on Service brake performance (78% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.092% fail on Service brake imbalance (80% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes (90% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.37% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.18% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.46% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.42% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.046% fail on Pedal
    • 0.37% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.37% fail on Lever
    • 0.046% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.046% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.046% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.046% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 7.2% fail on Visibility
    • 4.0% fail on Wipers (45% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.23% fail on View to rear
      • 0.23% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.18% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.14% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.14% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.2% fail on Suspension (58% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.83% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.23% fail on Linkage ball joints (82% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.092% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.046% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 1.4% fail on Springs (76% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Coil springs (76% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Coil spring (76% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.92% fail on Suspension arms (80% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Pins and bushes (67% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint (94% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.046% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.046% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.42% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.37% fail on Other suspension component (16 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.32% fail on Shock absorbers (64% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.14% fail on Wheel bearings (80% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.092% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.092% fail on Suspension rod (19 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.046% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.046% fail on Macpherson strut
  • 4.9% fail on Tyres
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.46% fail on Size/type
  • 1.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (63% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Bumpers (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Transmission (76% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Drive shafts (75% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.46% fail on Joints (74% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Exhaust system (84% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Body
      • 0.23% fail on Other body component
    • 0.092% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.046% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.046% fail on Sub-frame condition
      • 0.046% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.092% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.046% fail on Tank
      • 0.046% fail on Pipe
    • 0.046% fail on Chassis
      • 0.046% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.046% fail on Load security
      • 0.046% fail on Access panel
    • 0.046% fail on Seats
      • 0.046% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.046% fail on Undertray
  • 1.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (73% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (73% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Spark ignition (80% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.42% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (66% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Catalyst emissions (90% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.046% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.55% fail on Compression ignition (62% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (63% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.046% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.046% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.092% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.092% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 1.0% fail on Steering (57% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Steering linkage components (59% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Track rod end (64% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.092% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.046% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.18% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.14% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.046% fail on Operation
    • 0.092% fail on Steering play
      • 0.092% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.69% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.51% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.18% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
  • 0.46% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.46% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.32% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.32% fail on Attachment
  • 0.046% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.046% fail on Doors
      • 0.046% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors
Read the Honest John Review

  • Toyota Verso (2009 - 2013)
    Compact seven seater. Excellent Valvematic 1.8 petrol engine with smooth seven-ratio CVT gives 40+ mpg. Good reliability record.

    Search Good Garages