Toyota Verso MOT Results

Registered in 2009
68.9% pass rate
from 2,320 tests in 2020
(21% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Verso is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.26% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.3% fail on Position lamps (48% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Position lamp (45% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.086% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.043% fail on Switch
    • 3.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (46% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Direction indicators (45% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Flashing type (45% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Individual direction indicators (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.086% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.043% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.043% fail on Switch
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.043% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.69% fail on Stop lamp (81% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.34% fail on Horn
      • 0.086% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.26% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.26% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.26% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.043% fail on Switch
    • 0.17% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.13% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.043% fail on Reversing lamp switch
  • 7.6% fail on Visibility (39% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Wipers (89% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.22% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.22% fail on View to rear
      • 0.22% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.086% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.086% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.043% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.043% fail on Window
  • 6.6% fail on Brakes
    • 2.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.043% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.0% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.7% fail on Brake performance (55% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (48% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.82% fail on Rbt (sp) (45% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Service brake performance (71% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.60% fail on Rbt (71% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.56% fail on Service brake performance (68% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.043% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.56% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.47% fail on Rbt
          • 0.39% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.043% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.043% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.086% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.043% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.043% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.13% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.13% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.043% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.043% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (96% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.73% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.52% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.39% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.39% fail on Lever
    • 0.26% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.26% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.22% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.17% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.043% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.043% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 4.7% fail on Tyres (29% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.1% fail on Condition (30% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Size/type
  • 3.6% fail on Suspension (72% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (58% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.47% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.086% fail on Linkage ball joints (93% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.043% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.043% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.043% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.78% fail on Suspension arms (80% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes (90% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.086% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.086% fail on Ball joint (96% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.73% fail on Springs (83% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Coil springs (83% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.73% fail on Coil spring (83% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Shock absorbers (70% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Wheel bearings (70% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.086% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.043% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.043% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.043% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.043% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.043% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.043% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.043% fail on Sub-frame
  • 1.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure (51% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Transmission (57% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Drive shafts (58% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.60% fail on Joints (60% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.043% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.043% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.043% fail on Joints
    • 0.39% fail on Body (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Other body component (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.043% fail on Panel
    • 0.26% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.26% fail on Undertray (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Exhaust system (90% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.086% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.043% fail on Tank
      • 0.043% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.086% fail on Seats
      • 0.043% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.043% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.043% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.043% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.043% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.043% fail on Doors
      • 0.043% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.043% fail on Door condition
  • 1.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (66% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (67% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Spark ignition (61% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.69% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.086% fail on Catalyst emissions (91% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.043% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.043% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.34% fail on Compression ignition (77% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (65% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.043% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.086% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.043% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.043% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 0.043% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.043% fail on Undertray
  • 0.86% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.47% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.39% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
      • 0.086% fail on Attachment (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.82% fail on Steering (57% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.73% fail on Steering linkage components (53% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Track rod end (55% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.043% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.043% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.13% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.086% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.043% fail on Operation
    • 0.043% fail on Steering play
      • 0.043% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.65% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.65% fail on Attachment (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.52% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.52% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

  • Toyota Verso (2009 - 2013)
    Compact seven seater. Excellent Valvematic 1.8 petrol engine with smooth seven-ratio CVT gives 40+ mpg. Good reliability record.

    Search Good Garages