Toyota Urban Cruiser MOT Results

Registered in 2012
82.7% pass rate
from 625 tests in 2020
(35% better than other 2012 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Urban Cruiser is unusually good or bad.

  • 8.0% fail on Brakes (52% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.64% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.64% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.16% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.80% fail on Brake performance not tested (12 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.48% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.48% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.48% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.16% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.16% fail on Rbt
          • 0.16% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (8 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Electronic stability control (8 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.32% fail on Pedal
    • 0.16% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.16% fail on Lever
  • 4.2% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (54% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.64% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.48% fail on Headlamps (77% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Headlamp (76% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Rear reflectors (9 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.32% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.32% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.16% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.16% fail on Horn
    • 0.16% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.16% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.16% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 3.8% fail on Visibility
    • 2.6% fail on Wipers
    • 0.96% fail on Washers
    • 0.16% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.16% fail on View to rear
      • 0.16% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.7% fail on Tyres (52% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.3% fail on Condition
  • 2.6% fail on Suspension (61% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.64% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.48% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.16% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 1.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.3% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
  • 0.64% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.64% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.64% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.32% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.16% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.16% fail on Body
      • 0.16% fail on Panel
  • 0.32% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.32% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages