Toyota Urban Cruiser MOT Results

Registered in 2011
77.8% pass rate
from 1,106 tests in 2020
(28% better than other 2011 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2011 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Urban Cruiser is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.2% fail on Brakes (53% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums (92% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs (93% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (5 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.90% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (180% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.81% fail on Rbt (sp) (160% worse than other 2011 cars)
          • 0.72% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.090% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.81% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.63% fail on Rbt
          • 0.45% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.18% fail on Decelerometer (25 times worse than other 2011 cars)
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake performance (26 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.63% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.18% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.27% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.18% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.090% fail on Rbt
          • 0.090% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.090% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.090% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 1.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Electronic stability control (7 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.54% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.36% fail on Pedal (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.36% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.36% fail on Lever
    • 0.36% fail on Flexible brake hoses (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.090% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.090% fail on Brake fluid
  • 5.3% fail on Visibility
    • 3.7% fail on Wipers (60% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.18% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.090% fail on View to rear
      • 0.090% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.0% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (53% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.72% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.72% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.54% fail on Rear reflectors (9 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Headlamps (81% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Headlamp (80% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Stop lamp (80% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (73% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.18% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.18% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.090% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.090% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.090% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.090% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.090% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.090% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.090% fail on Horn
  • 2.8% fail on Tyres (54% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Tread depth (53% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Condition (55% better than other 2011 cars)
  • 2.4% fail on Suspension (72% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Suspension arms (46% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.090% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.45% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.27% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.27% fail on Anti-roll bars (83% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.090% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.090% fail on Springs
      • 0.090% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.090% fail on Coil spring
  • 1.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.2% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.99% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (170% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.18% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.63% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.54% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.18% fail on Catalyst emissions
  • 0.72% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.72% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.63% fail on Body, chassis, structure (73% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Transmission
      • 0.18% fail on Drive shafts (79% better than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Joints (79% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.18% fail on Joints
    • 0.18% fail on Exhaust system (80% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.18% fail on Pipe (9 times worse than other 2011 cars)
  • 0.18% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.090% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.090% fail on Condition
    • 0.090% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.090% fail on Steering
    • 0.090% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.090% fail on Locking devices

Search Good Garages