Toyota Urban Cruiser MOT Results

Registered in 2010
76.9% pass rate
from 1,300 tests in 2020
(34% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Urban Cruiser is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.2% fail on Brakes (28% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.7% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.15% fail on Brake linings (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Brake discs and drums (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Brake discs (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.46% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.77% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.46% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.62% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.54% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.077% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.38% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.077% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.077% fail on Rbt
          • 0.077% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.92% fail on Electronic stability control (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.23% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.15% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.077% fail on Pedal
    • 0.23% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.23% fail on Lever
    • 0.077% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.077% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.077% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.077% fail on Other components
  • 6.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (49% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.077% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.2% fail on Stop lamp (59% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.92% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (56% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Headlamps (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Headlamp (89% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.077% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.38% fail on Rear reflectors (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.23% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.15% fail on Horn
  • 5.5% fail on Visibility
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 1.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.15% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.077% fail on View to rear
      • 0.077% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.5% fail on Tyres (44% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth (38% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Condition (49% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.077% fail on Size/type
  • 1.7% fail on Suspension (84% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.54% fail on Anti-roll bars (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.077% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.077% fail on Linkage
      • 0.077% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.31% fail on Suspension arms (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint (91% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.077% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.077% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.23% fail on Springs (94% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Coil springs (94% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Coil spring (94% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 1.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (49% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (45% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.92% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.31% fail on Catalyst emissions
      • 0.31% fail on Compression ignition (75% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure (63% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Transmission
      • 0.31% fail on Drive shafts (73% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Joints (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Prop shafts (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Joints
        • 0.077% fail on Prop shaft
    • 0.46% fail on Exhaust system (66% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.077% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.077% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.077% fail on Doors
      • 0.077% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.077% fail on Hinge
  • 0.62% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.62% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.62% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.54% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.46% fail on Condition
      • 0.077% fail on Requirements
    • 0.077% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.38% fail on Steering (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Steering linkage components (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Track rod end (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.077% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.077% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.077% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.38% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.38% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages