MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Urban Cruiser » 2010

Toyota Urban Cruiser MOT Results

Registered in 2010
73.4% pass rate
from 1,250 tests in 2021
(30% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Urban Cruiser is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.4% fail on Brakes
    • 3.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.64% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.080% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.080% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.080% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.080% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.88% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.80% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.48% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.40% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.080% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.64% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (64% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Rbt (sp) (72% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.24% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.24% fail on Rbt
          • 0.16% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.080% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 3.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.080% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.080% fail on Lever
    • 2.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Electronic stability control (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.080% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.40% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.24% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.16% fail on Pedal
    • 0.080% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.080% fail on Lever
    • 0.080% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.080% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.080% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.080% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.080% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 6.3% fail on Visibility
    • 4.0% fail on Wipers (58% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.080% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.080% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.080% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (53% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Stop lamp (45% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim (48% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.80% fail on Headlamps (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Headlamp (72% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Rear reflectors (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Direction indicators (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Flashing type (88% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.080% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.080% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.080% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.24% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.16% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.080% fail on Horn
    • 0.080% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.080% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.080% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.080% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.080% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 3.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.24% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.32% fail on Compression ignition (75% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.080% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.080% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.080% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 2.6% fail on Suspension (80% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (65% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Linkage ball joints (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.080% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.64% fail on Springs (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Coil springs (88% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.64% fail on Coil spring (88% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.24% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.16% fail on Suspension arms (96% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.080% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.080% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.16% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.080% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.080% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.080% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.080% fail on Sub-frame
  • 2.6% fail on Tyres (58% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Condition (50% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth (60% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 1.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure (59% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.64% fail on Exhaust system (62% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Transmission (65% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Drive shafts (74% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on Joints (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.080% fail on Joints
        • 0.080% fail on Flexible couplings
    • 0.24% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.16% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.16% fail on Pipe (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.080% fail on Seats
      • 0.080% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 0.72% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.72% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.56% fail on Condition
      • 0.16% fail on Requirements (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.56% fail on Steering (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Steering linkage components (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Track rod end (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.080% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.080% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.080% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.080% fail on Steering play
      • 0.080% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.48% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.48% fail on Attachment
  • 0.32% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.32% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages