Toyota Urban Cruiser MOT Results

Registered in 2009
73.9% pass rate
from 1,284 tests in 2020
(32% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Urban Cruiser is unusually good or bad.

  • 10% fail on Brakes (23% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (27% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (34% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Brake pads (35% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Brake discs and drums (56% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Brake discs (57% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Brake performance (3.4% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance (11% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt (6.7% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance (3.9% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.62% fail on Service brake imbalance (38% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Plate brake tester (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.078% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.078% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.078% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.078% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.93% fail on Service brake imbalance (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.23% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (53% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.86% fail on Rbt (sp) (50% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Brake performance not tested (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Parking brake performance (80% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Rbt (79% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.078% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.078% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 2.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Electronic stability control (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Anti-lock braking system (1.7% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.078% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.16% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (52% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Pedal (31% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Flexible brake hoses (33% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.078% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.078% fail on Lever
    • 0.078% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.078% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 6.5% fail on Visibility (15% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Wipers (67% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Washers (23% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Driver's view (26% worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 5.1% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (60% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim (44% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim (39% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Stop lamp (56% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (49% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Headlamps (69% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Headlamp (68% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Rear reflectors (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.078% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.078% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.078% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.078% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.078% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 3.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (3.0% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (3.0% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Spark ignition (55% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Catalyst emissions (6.6% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Emissions not tested (16% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Emission control equipment (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.078% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.078% fail on Oxygen sensor
        • 0.078% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.16% fail on Compression ignition (89% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.078% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.078% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 3.8% fail on Tyres (43% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth (34% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Condition (53% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 2.8% fail on Suspension (79% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Anti-roll bars (77% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (47% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover (71% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.078% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.70% fail on Wheel bearings (12% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Springs (91% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Coil springs (91% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Coil spring (91% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Suspension arms (93% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.078% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.31% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Sub-frames (11% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Sub-frame (21% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.078% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.16% fail on Shock absorbers (90% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 1.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure (55% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Exhaust system (21% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Transmission (74% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Drive shafts (72% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.47% fail on Joints (72% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.078% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.078% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.078% fail on Engine mounting condition
  • 0.93% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (2.2% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Seat belts (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.078% fail on Requirements
    • 0.078% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.39% fail on Identification of the vehicle (14% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Registration plates (14% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.31% fail on Road Wheels (30% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Attachment (25% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.078% fail on Condition
  • 0.16% fail on Steering (92% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.078% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.078% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.078% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.078% fail on Ball joint

Search Good Garages