Toyota Supra MOT Results
Registered in 198968.4% pass rate
from 95 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1989 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Supra is unusually good or bad.
-
12% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.2% fail on Headlamp
- 1.1% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
4.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 2.1% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.1% fail on All direction indicators
-
2.1% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.1% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
2.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
2.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.1% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.1% fail on Horn
-
4.2% fail on
Headlamps
-
11% fail on
Brakes
-
4.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
2.1% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
1.1% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
- 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
- 1.1% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
2.1% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.2% fail on Flexible brake hoses (5 times worse than other 1989 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake control
- 1.1% fail on Lever
- 1.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.1% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 1.1% fail on Other components
-
1.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.1% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.1% fail on Brake discs
-
1.1% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
1.1% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
4.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
11% fail on
Suspension
- 6.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
3.2% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.1% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 2.1% fail on Shock absorbers
-
2.1% fail on
Sub-frames
- 2.1% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 1989 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.1% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 1.1% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
1.1% fail on
Other suspension component
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint
-
6.3% fail on
Visibility
- 4.2% fail on Wipers
- 2.1% fail on Washers
-
5.3% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
3.2% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 3.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
1.1% fail on
Chassis
- 1.1% fail on Chassis condition
- 1.1% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.1% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.1% fail on Tank
-
3.2% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
4.2% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
4.2% fail on
Seat belts
- 4.2% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.1% fail on Attachment
-
4.2% fail on
Seat belts
-
4.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
3.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.2% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.1% fail on Emissions not tested
- 1.1% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 1.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
3.2% fail on
Spark ignition
-
1.1% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 1.1% fail on Other leaks
-
3.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.1% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.1% fail on Registration plates
-
1.1% fail on
Steering
-
1.1% fail on
Power steering
- 1.1% fail on Operation
-
1.1% fail on
Power steering
-
1.1% fail on
Road Wheels
- 1.1% fail on Attachment