Toyota Starlet MOT Results
Registered in 199961.8% pass rate
from 1,228 tests in 2017
(22% better than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Starlet is unusually good or bad.
-
17% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(32% better than other 1999 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Stop lamp
- 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim (33% better than other 1999 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Position lamps
(40% better than other 1999 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Front lamps (41% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.081% fail on All position lamps
- 3.6% fail on Registration plate lamp (37% better than other 1999 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp
-
1.4% fail on
Direction indicators
(51% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
(51% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.16% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.081% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
(51% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Battery
- 0.41% fail on Horn
-
0.33% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(79% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Fog lamp (78% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.081% fail on Lamp
- 0.081% fail on Switch
- 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.081% fail on Electrical wiring
-
12% fail on
Suspension
(42% better than other 1999 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Drive shafts
(61% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Front drive shafts
(64% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Constant velocity joints (65% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Front drive shafts
(64% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Wheel bearings
(110% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Rear (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Front
-
2.2% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 2.2% fail on Condition
-
1.3% fail on
Prescribed areas
(78% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Component mounting (75% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.081% fail on Subframe mounting
-
0.73% fail on
Coil springs
(74% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Condition (79% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Location
-
0.49% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(90% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (74% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Linkage condition
-
0.41% fail on
Suspension arms
(90% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (92% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.081% fail on Condition
-
0.16% fail on
Panhard rods
- 0.16% fail on Attachment (23 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.081% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.081% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.081% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
6.4% fail on
Drive shafts
(61% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
10% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 6.7% fail on Emissions
- 5.9% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.81% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.16% fail on
Fuel system
(83% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.081% fail on Tank
- 0.081% fail on Cap
-
9.9% fail on
Brakes
(43% better than other 1999 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Brake performance
(32% better than other 1999 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Rear wheels
- 3.0% fail on Front wheels
- 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance (42% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.90% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.57% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.081% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
2.9% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(58% better than other 1999 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Components
(55% better than other 1999 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Pipes
- 0.24% fail on Hoses (86% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.081% fail on Operation
-
2.8% fail on
Components
(55% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Hub components
(47% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads
- 0.41% fail on Brake discs
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.1% fail on Condition
-
0.41% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.41% fail on
Pedal
- 0.33% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.081% fail on Condition
-
0.41% fail on
Pedal
- 0.33% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.081% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.081% fail on Cable
-
6.4% fail on
Brake performance
(32% better than other 1999 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 6.2% fail on Wipers
- 2.7% fail on Washers
- 0.41% fail on Windscreen
- 0.33% fail on Mirrors
- 0.24% fail on Bonnet
-
8.4% fail on
Tyres
- 5.0% fail on Tread depth
- 3.7% fail on Condition
- 0.33% fail on Size/type
- 0.081% fail on Valve stem
-
2.0% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 2.0% fail on Registration plate
-
0.90% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(79% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Doors
- 0.16% fail on Drivers
- 0.16% fail on Passengers front
- 0.24% fail on Body condition (88% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Vehicle structure
(86% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Chassis (86% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Load security
- 0.16% fail on Bootlid (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Doors
-
0.73% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(86% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.73% fail on
Seat belts
(81% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Prescribed areas (87% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Condition
- 0.081% fail on Requirements
-
0.73% fail on
Seat belts
(81% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Steering
(89% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Steering system
(94% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Track rod end (93% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.081% fail on Steering rack
-
0.24% fail on
Power steering
- 0.24% fail on Pump (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Steering system
(94% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.33% fail on Condition