Toyota Starlet MOT Results

Registered in 1999
61.8% pass rate
from 1,228 tests in 2017
(22% better than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Starlet is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (32% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim (33% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Position lamps (40% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Front lamps (41% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.081% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.6% fail on Registration plate lamp (37% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators (51% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type (51% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.16% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.081% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.1% fail on Battery
    • 0.41% fail on Horn
    • 0.33% fail on Rear fog lamp (79% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Fog lamp (78% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.081% fail on Lamp
      • 0.081% fail on Switch
    • 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.081% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 12% fail on Suspension (42% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Drive shafts (61% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 6.4% fail on Front drive shafts (64% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 6.4% fail on Constant velocity joints (65% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Wheel bearings (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Rear (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Front
    • 2.2% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas (78% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Component mounting (75% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 0.73% fail on Coil springs (74% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Condition (79% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Location
    • 0.49% fail on Anti-roll bars (90% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (74% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.41% fail on Suspension arms (90% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (92% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on Panhard rods
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment (23 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.081% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.081% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.081% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 10% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 6.7% fail on Emissions
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.81% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.16% fail on Fuel system (83% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Tank
      • 0.081% fail on Cap
  • 9.9% fail on Brakes (43% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Brake performance (32% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.0% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance (42% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.57% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.081% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.9% fail on Hydraulic systems (58% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Components (55% better than other 1999 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Pipes
        • 0.24% fail on Hoses (86% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Operation
    • 1.5% fail on Hub components (47% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.41% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.41% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.41% fail on Pedal
        • 0.33% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.081% fail on Condition
    • 0.33% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.081% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.081% fail on Cable
  • 9.2% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.2% fail on Wipers
    • 2.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.41% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.33% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.24% fail on Bonnet
  • 8.4% fail on Tyres
    • 5.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.33% fail on Size/type
    • 0.081% fail on Valve stem
  • 2.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.90% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (79% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Doors
      • 0.16% fail on Drivers
      • 0.16% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.24% fail on Body condition (88% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Vehicle structure (86% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Chassis (86% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Load security
      • 0.16% fail on Bootlid (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 0.73% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (86% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.73% fail on Seat belts (81% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Prescribed areas (87% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Condition
      • 0.081% fail on Requirements
  • 0.49% fail on Steering (89% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Steering system (94% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Track rod end (93% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.24% fail on Power steering
      • 0.24% fail on Pump (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  • 0.33% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.33% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages