Toyota Starlet MOT Results

Registered in 1999

63.5% pass rate

from 762 tests in 2021

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Starlet is unusually good or bad.

11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 3.9% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.6% fail on Headlamps
  - 2.2% fail on Headlamp
  - 0.39% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 1.3% fail on Direction indicators
  - 1.3% fail on Flashing type
    - 1.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
    - 0.13% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.79% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.52% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.39% fail on Battery(ies)
  - 0.13% fail on Horn
- 0.39% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.39% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.39% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.26% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
  - 0.13% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  - 0.13% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
- 0.13% fail on Position lamps
  - 0.13% fail on Position lamp
10% fail on Brakes
- 8.7% fail on Brake performance
  - 3.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 3.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
    - 3.5% fail on Rbt
      - 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.79% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.13% fail on Plate brake tester
      - 0.13% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
  - 3.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 3.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 3.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (87% worse than other 1999 cars)
      - 0.26% fail on Service brake performance
  - 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 2.2% fail on Rbt (91% worse than other 1999 cars)
      - 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance
      - 0.26% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 1.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (53% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.92% fail on Lever
- 0.66% fail on Mechanical brake components (68% better than other 1999 cars)
  - 0.39% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 0.39% fail on Brake pads
  - 0.39% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 0.39% fail on Brake discs
- 0.13% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.13% fail on Hand lever
- 0.13% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 0.13% fail on Anti-lock braking system
10% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 5.9% fail on Transmission (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 5.8% fail on Drive shafts (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
    - 5.8% fail on Joints (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Prop shafts
    - 0.13% fail on Joints
- 3.0% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.66% fail on Chassis
  - 0.66% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.52% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.39% fail on Tank
  - 0.13% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.52% fail on Body
  - 0.39% fail on Panel
  - 0.13% fail on Other body component
- 0.39% fail on Integral vehicle structure (78% better than other 1999 cars)
  - 0.39% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (78% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Bumpers
- 0.13% fail on Doors
  - 0.13% fail on Driver's door
    - 0.13% fail on Door condition
- 0.13% fail on Seats
  - 0.13% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.13% fail on Cabs
  - 0.13% fail on Prescribed areas
8.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 8.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 8.1% fail on Spark ignition
    - 6.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
    - 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
    - 0.26% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    - 0.13% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  - 0.26% fail on Compression ignition
    - 0.26% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.52% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.26% fail on Engine oil leaks
  - 0.26% fail on Other leaks
8.3% fail on Suspension (43% better than other 1999 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (54% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.92% fail on Suspension arms (79% better than other 1999 cars)
  - 0.52% fail on Suspension arm
  - 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.13% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.66% fail on Springs (72% better than other 1999 cars)
  - 0.66% fail on Coil springs (71% better than other 1999 cars)
    - 0.66% fail on Coil spring (70% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Anti-roll bars (84% better than other 1999 cars)
  - 0.26% fail on Linkage
  - 0.26% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Macpherson strut
  - 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  - 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.26% fail on Suspension rods
  - 0.26% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (22 times worse than other 1999 cars)
6.8% fail on Visibility
- 4.1% fail on Wipers
- 2.6% fail on Washers
- 0.13% fail on Bonnet
- 0.13% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.13% fail on Windscreen
- 0.13% fail on View to rear
  - 0.13% fail on Indirect vision devices
3.9% fail on Tyres
- 2.1% fail on Tread depth
- 1.6% fail on Condition
- 0.39% fail on Size/type
1.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (64% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.52% fail on Prescribed areas (75% better than other 1999 cars)
  - 0.52% fail on Condition
  - 0.26% fail on Requirements
- 0.13% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
1.2% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 1.2% fail on Registration plates
0.66% fail on Steering (82% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Steering linkage components (77% better than other 1999 cars)
  - 0.52% fail on Track rod end (70% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Power steering
  - 0.13% fail on Other components
0.13% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.13% fail on Speedometer