Toyota RAV4 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
74.5% pass rate
from 4,306 tests in 2020
(32% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota RAV4 is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.3% fail on Brakes (6.0% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (2.2% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (12% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Brake pads (13% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Brake discs and drums (53% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.56% fail on Brake discs (52% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (79% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.093% fail on Cable (51% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.070% fail on Lever (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Brake performance (24% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (5.8% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (25% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.023% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance (68% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (54% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.95% fail on Parking brake performance (57% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.046% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (22% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.046% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.093% fail on Decelerometer (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.093% fail on Parking brake performance (27 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.046% fail on Plate brake tester (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.023% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.023% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.74% fail on Service brake performance (61% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.72% fail on Rbt (61% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.67% fail on Service brake performance (57% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.070% fail on Service brake imbalance (82% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.023% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.023% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.30% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (40% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Rbt (sp) (62% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake imbalance (70% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.070% fail on Service brake performance (54% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.070% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.046% fail on Plate brake tester (sp) (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.046% fail on Service brake imbalance (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Brake performance not tested (17% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (45% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Hand lever (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Pedal
    • 0.30% fail on Parking brake control (8.1% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Lever (5.9% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (56% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Electronic stability control (22% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.070% fail on Hydraulic systems (27% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Brake fluid (3.1% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on Flexible brake hoses (30% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 6.4% fail on Suspension (46% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (40% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (0.78% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint dust cover (8.9% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage ball joints (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Anti-roll bar (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint (62% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers (3.7% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.70% fail on Suspension arms (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Pins and bushes (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Ball joint dust cover (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.12% fail on Wheel bearings (77% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Springs (97% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Coil springs (97% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Coil spring (97% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.023% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.023% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.023% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.023% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.023% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 5.6% fail on Visibility (9.9% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Wipers (41% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Washers (16% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Driver's view (59% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on View to rear (20% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Mirrors (19% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on Condition of glass (19% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Windscreen (18% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.023% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.2% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (56% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (8.1% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim (44% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim (41% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (60% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Headlamps (74% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Headlamp (72% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.65% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (29% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Rear fog lamp (30% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.65% fail on Rear fog lamp (33% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Direction indicators (89% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Flashing type (89% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Side repeaters (78% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.070% fail on Individual direction indicators (94% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Electrical equipment (48% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Battery(ies) (35% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Horn (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Trailer electrical socket (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.16% fail on Stop lamp (95% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on Rear reflectors (14% worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 2.8% fail on Tyres (56% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth (51% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.00% fail on Condition (65% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 1.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure (66% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Transmission (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Drive shafts (76% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Joints (75% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Prop shafts (90% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.070% fail on Prop shaft (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.046% fail on Joints (8.2% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Fuel system (46% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Pipe (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Tank (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Hose (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Exhaust system (85% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Bumpers (14% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.093% fail on Undertray (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on Body (20% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Other body component (1.8% worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 1.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (45% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Requirements (17 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.95% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (69% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.84% fail on Exhaust emissions (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Compression ignition (35% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (27% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (67% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested (13% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.046% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (40% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.023% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.093% fail on Spark ignition (95% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.046% fail on Catalyst emissions (94% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.023% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.023% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.093% fail on Fluid leaks (50% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Other leaks (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 0.046% fail on Noise suppression (66% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Undertray (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.42% fail on Identification of the vehicle (2.3% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Registration plates (2.5% worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.21% fail on Road Wheels (50% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Attachment (31% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.12% fail on Steering (94% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.093% fail on Steering linkage components (94% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Track rod end (94% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.023% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.023% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.023% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.023% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

  • Toyota RAV4 (2006 - 2013)
    Bigger and now 5-door only. More luxurious but not as practical as previous RAV-4. Car-like road manners. Petrol and diesel automatics. Facelifted 2010.

    Search Good Garages