Toyota RAV4 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
80.0% pass rate
from 3,923 tests in 2017
(32% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota RAV4 is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.5% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (43% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.7% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.076% fail on Rear lamps (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim (53% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.51% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.36% fail on Headlamps (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Headlamp (84% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Direction indicators (88% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Flashing type (88% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Side repeaters (72% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.025% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.13% fail on Battery
    • 0.10% fail on Stop lamp (96% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.051% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.051% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 5.4% fail on Suspension (33% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (69% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage condition (19 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (51% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Condition (20 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.076% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.051% fail on Presence (43 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Shock absorbers (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.076% fail on Coil springs (98% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Location
      • 0.025% fail on Condition
    • 0.051% fail on Suspension arms (96% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Condition
      • 0.025% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.051% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.025% fail on Condition
      • 0.025% fail on Attachment
    • 0.051% fail on Front suspension joints (85% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.025% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.025% fail on Front
    • 0.025% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.025% fail on Component mounting
    • 0.025% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.025% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.025% fail on Constant velocity joints
  • 4.6% fail on Brakes (18% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Hub components
      • 2.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.31% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.025% fail on Brake linings
    • 1.5% fail on Brake performance (30% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.71% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.15% fail on Front wheels (76% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Parking brake operation (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.051% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.025% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.025% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.61% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.59% fail on Components
        • 0.51% fail on Pipes
        • 0.051% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.025% fail on Hoses
      • 0.025% fail on Leaks
    • 0.31% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.31% fail on Condition
    • 0.076% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.051% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.025% fail on ABS
  • 4.3% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 2.9% fail on Wipers
    • 0.97% fail on Washers (47% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.051% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.025% fail on Bonnet
  • 2.1% fail on Tyres (68% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Tread depth (66% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Condition (77% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Valve stem (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.46% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.46% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.28% fail on Requirements (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
      • 0.025% fail on Attachment
      • 0.025% fail on Installation check
        • 0.025% fail on Belt(s)/padding
  • 0.28% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.28% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.20% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (86% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.10% fail on Pipe (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Tank
      • 0.025% fail on Hose
    • 0.051% fail on Exhaust system (95% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.025% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.10% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (69% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.076% fail on Body condition
    • 0.025% fail on Body security
  • 0.076% fail on Steering (93% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.051% fail on Steering system (94% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Track rod end (93% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.025% fail on Steering operation
  • 0.076% fail on Road Wheels (75% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.076% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Toyota RAV4 (2006 - 2013)
    Bigger and now 5-door only. More luxurious but not as practical as previous RAV-4. Car-like road manners. Petrol and diesel automatics. Facelifted 2010.

    Search Good Garages