Toyota RAV4 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
75.6% pass rate
from 4,503 tests in 2020
(30% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota RAV4 is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.2% fail on Brakes
    • 3.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.73% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.73% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.044% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.044% fail on Cable
    • 2.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.31% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance (75% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.95% fail on Rbt (63% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.84% fail on Parking brake performance (62% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.089% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.022% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.067% fail on Plate brake tester (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.044% fail on Parking brake performance (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.022% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.044% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.044% fail on Parking brake performance (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Service brake performance (38% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (37% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.00% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.089% fail on Service brake imbalance (75% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (64% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.067% fail on Rbt (sp) (84% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.044% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.022% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.044% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.044% fail on Plate brake tester (sp) (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.044% fail on Service brake imbalance (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.00% fail on Rigid brake pipes (91% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.49% fail on Lever (80% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.24% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.20% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.20% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.044% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.022% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.022% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.044% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 6.5% fail on Suspension (40% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (64% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Linkage (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.42% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.20% fail on Linkage ball joints (78% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (21 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.089% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.067% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.27% fail on Suspension arms (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Pins and bushes (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.18% fail on Wheel bearings (60% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Springs (97% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Coil springs (97% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Coil spring (97% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.044% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.022% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.022% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.022% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.022% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.022% fail on Ball joint
  • 6.4% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (50% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.8% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.067% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim (50% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim (48% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (82% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.84% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (84% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Rear fog lamp (85% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.84% fail on Rear fog lamp (89% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.022% fail on Switch
    • 0.44% fail on Headlamps (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Headlamp (84% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Stop lamp (94% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.11% fail on Trailer electrical socket (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.022% fail on Horn
    • 0.13% fail on Direction indicators (93% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Flashing type (93% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Side repeaters (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.044% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.022% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.022% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 4.9% fail on Visibility
    • 2.9% fail on Wipers
    • 1.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.22% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.067% fail on View to rear
      • 0.044% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.022% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.044% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.044% fail on Windscreen
  • 3.0% fail on Tyres (53% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Tread depth (49% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Condition (60% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.93% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (67% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Exhaust emissions (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Compression ignition (41% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.56% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.13% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (67% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.044% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.11% fail on Spark ignition (93% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.067% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (91% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.022% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.022% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.067% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.044% fail on Undertray
      • 0.022% fail on Sound deadening material
    • 0.044% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.022% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.022% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 0.80% fail on Body, chassis, structure (75% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.16% fail on Pipe (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on System
      • 0.022% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.16% fail on Exhaust system (89% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.11% fail on Transmission (91% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Drive shafts (90% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Joints (90% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.089% fail on Body
      • 0.089% fail on Other body component
    • 0.067% fail on Undertray
  • 0.76% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.73% fail on Seat belts (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Condition (99% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Requirements (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.022% fail on Airbags
      • 0.022% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.022% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.40% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.40% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.18% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.18% fail on Attachment
  • 0.044% fail on Steering (98% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.022% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.022% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.022% fail on Power steering
      • 0.022% fail on Other components
Read the Honest John Review

  • Toyota RAV4 (2006 - 2013)
    Bigger and now 5-door only. More luxurious but not as practical as previous RAV-4. Car-like road manners. Petrol and diesel automatics. Facelifted 2010.

    Search Good Garages