MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » RAV4 » 2002

Toyota RAV4 MOT Results

Registered in 2002
58.9% pass rate
from 7,204 tests in 2020
(15% better than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota RAV4 is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (19% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.7% fail on Headlamp (19% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Headlamp levelling device (78% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Position lamps (17% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Position lamp (17% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (48% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim (47% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (68% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (56% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (42% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Rear fog lamp (42% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.76% fail on Rear fog lamp (43% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Switch
    • 0.33% fail on Electrical equipment (68% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Battery(ies) (66% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Horn (75% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.014% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.19% fail on Direction indicators (92% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Flashing type (92% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.097% fail on Side repeaters (87% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.083% fail on Individual direction indicators (95% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.11% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.042% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.042% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 13% fail on Suspension (29% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (24% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Linkage ball joints (72% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (56% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.00% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.097% fail on Linkage (79% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.083% fail on Pins and bushes (80% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.069% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (89% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.014% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.014% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.9% fail on Springs
      • 3.8% fail on Coil springs
        • 3.8% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.014% fail on Mounting
      • 0.097% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (44% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.81% fail on Shock absorbers (43% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Wheel bearings (55% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Suspension arms (90% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes (94% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Suspension arm (54% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover (85% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint (95% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.069% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.49% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.31% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.18% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.014% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.19% fail on Macpherson strut (49% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Macpherson strut (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.097% fail on Other suspension component (82% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.014% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.014% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.014% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.014% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.083% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.028% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.028% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.014% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.014% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.028% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.028% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.014% fail on Axles
      • 0.014% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
  • 11% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (41% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 11% fail on Exhaust emissions (49% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 10% fail on Spark ignition (57% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 6.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 4.2% fail on Catalyst emissions (26% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.042% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.014% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.014% fail on Oxygen sensor
      • 1.2% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.58% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.33% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.097% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.056% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.028% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 0.37% fail on Fluid leaks (50% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Engine oil leaks (50% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.028% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.014% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 11% fail on Brakes (30% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (39% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Brake linings and pads (72% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 3.9% fail on Brake pads (73% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.028% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.028% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (90% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Lever
        • 0.014% fail on Clevis joint
    • 3.3% fail on Brake performance (60% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance (48% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (49% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance (50% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.32% fail on Service brake imbalance (58% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.083% fail on Decelerometer (200% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.083% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.00% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (76% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.69% fail on Rbt (sp) (83% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.014% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 0.61% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (71% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Rbt (sp) (76% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.42% fail on Service brake imbalance (71% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.097% fail on Service brake performance (88% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.014% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.014% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.57% fail on Parking brake performance (68% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.50% fail on Rbt (71% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.43% fail on Parking brake performance (71% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.069% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.056% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.056% fail on Parking brake performance (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.014% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.33% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (19% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.40% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (71% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Anti-lock braking system (66% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (38% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Pedal
      • 0.17% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.24% fail on Parking brake control (55% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Lever (55% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.14% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.042% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.083% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.069% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.014% fail on Valves
    • 0.056% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.042% fail on Other components
      • 0.014% fail on Additional braking device
  • 6.4% fail on Visibility (25% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers
    • 1.9% fail on Washers (48% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.12% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.12% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.11% fail on View to rear (69% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Mirrors (68% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.028% fail on Bonnet (81% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 5.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure (46% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.79% fail on Transmission (80% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Drive shafts (82% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.65% fail on Joints (82% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.12% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.083% fail on Prop shaft (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.014% fail on Joints
        • 0.014% fail on Flexible couplings
        • 0.014% fail on Bearing housing
    • 0.57% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.40% fail on Tank (160% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (66% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Pipe
      • 0.014% fail on Hose
    • 0.31% fail on Chassis (54% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Chassis condition (53% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Seats
      • 0.18% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.083% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.25% fail on Integral vehicle structure (70% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (74% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.042% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.25% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.18% fail on Body
      • 0.14% fail on Other body component
      • 0.042% fail on Panel
    • 0.083% fail on Towbar
      • 0.069% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.014% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.056% fail on Doors (91% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Other passenger's door (88% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.042% fail on Door condition (88% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.014% fail on Catch
    • 0.028% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.014% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.014% fail on Bracket
    • 0.028% fail on Floor
    • 0.028% fail on Cabs
      • 0.028% fail on Steps (13 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.014% fail on Undertray
  • 3.6% fail on Tyres (50% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth (45% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Condition (57% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.083% fail on Size/type (71% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 0.97% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (75% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.93% fail on Seat belts (58% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Condition
      • 0.18% fail on Prescribed areas (89% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Requirements
      • 0.028% fail on Attachment
    • 0.056% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (97% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 0.71% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.71% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.65% fail on Steering (86% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Steering linkage components (90% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Track rod end (93% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.028% fail on Ball joint (86% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.014% fail on Other components
        • 0.014% fail on Steering component
    • 0.15% fail on Steering gear (82% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Steering rack (82% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Power steering (62% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.069% fail on Operation
      • 0.069% fail on Other components
      • 0.028% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.014% fail on Steering column
    • 0.014% fail on Steering play
      • 0.014% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.39% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.39% fail on Attachment
  • 0.083% fail on Seat belt installation check (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.056% fail on Belt(s)/padding (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.028% fail on Anchorages
  • 0.014% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.014% fail on Speedometer

Search Good Garages