MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » RAV4 » 2000

Toyota RAV4 MOT Results

Registered in 2000
61.5% pass rate
from 2,160 tests in 2017
(22% better than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota RAV4 is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (43% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Position lamps (34% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.32% fail on Rear lamps (83% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.3% fail on Stop lamp (40% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Registration plate lamp (48% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim (58% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps (63% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp (61% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.046% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.4% fail on Fog lamp
    • 1.0% fail on Battery
    • 0.23% fail on Direction indicators (92% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Flashing type (92% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Individual lamps (92% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.046% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.046% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.14% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.093% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.093% fail on Horn (83% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.093% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.046% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.046% fail on Switch
  • 13% fail on Brakes (23% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.8% fail on Components
        • 4.0% fail on Pipes
        • 3.1% fail on Hoses (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.19% fail on Leaks
      • 0.093% fail on Operation
    • 4.6% fail on Brake performance (49% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance (59% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Front wheels (51% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Rear wheels (66% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.32% fail on Service brake performance (72% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.23% fail on Brake operation (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Parking brake operation
    • 3.1% fail on Hub components
      • 2.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.69% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.19% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.093% fail on Brake back plates
    • 0.97% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.97% fail on Condition
    • 0.51% fail on ABS (63% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.093% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.093% fail on Pedal
        • 0.093% fail on Condition
    • 0.046% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.046% fail on Cable
    • 0.046% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.046% fail on Components
        • 0.046% fail on Hoses
    • 0.046% fail on Locking devices
  • 13% fail on Suspension (41% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Coil springs
      • 3.4% fail on Condition
      • 0.046% fail on Location
    • 3.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (33% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.32% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (66% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Linkage condition (84% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Attachment
    • 2.9% fail on Prescribed areas (43% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Component mounting (41% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Spring mounting
      • 0.42% fail on Subframe mounting (57% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms (68% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (95% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Attachment
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.79% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.79% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Wheel bearings (59% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Front
      • 0.37% fail on Rear (69% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Drive shafts (83% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Front drive shafts (83% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.74% fail on Constant velocity joints (82% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.28% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Front suspension joints (91% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.046% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.046% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 9.1% fail on Emissions (44% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust system (38% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.46% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.23% fail on Tank
      • 0.14% fail on Cap
      • 0.046% fail on Pipe
      • 0.046% fail on System
  • 7.5% fail on Driver's view of the road (22% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Wipers
    • 1.6% fail on Washers (56% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.19% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.093% fail on Bonnet
  • 3.9% fail on Tyres (54% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth (51% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Condition (56% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.046% fail on Size/type
  • 1.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (69% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Seat belts (56% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Prescribed areas (67% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Condition
      • 0.093% fail on Attachment
      • 0.046% fail on Requirements
    • 0.046% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.046% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.046% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 1.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (63% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Body condition (55% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.46% fail on Chassis
    • 0.19% fail on Seats
      • 0.19% fail on Passengers
      • 0.046% fail on Drivers
    • 0.14% fail on Doors (77% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.046% fail on Passengers front
  • 1.1% fail on Steering (76% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Power steering
      • 0.28% fail on Operation
      • 0.19% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.093% fail on Pump
      • 0.046% fail on Drive system
      • 0.046% fail on Other components
    • 0.42% fail on Steering system (90% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Steering rack (78% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Track rod end (94% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Free play
        • 0.046% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.093% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.046% fail on Steering control
      • 0.046% fail on Steering lock
    • 0.046% fail on Steering operation
  • 0.56% fail on Towbars (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.046% fail on Towbar
  • 0.42% fail on Registration plates and VIN (68% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Registration plate (68% better than other 2000 cars)
  • 0.19% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.19% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Toyota RAV4 (2000 - 2006)
    More versatile, classier and even more car-like to drive than the previous model. Chain cam petrol engines. Much improved from 2004 onwards.
  • Toyota RAV4 (1994 - 2000)
    Fine car-like drive. Multiple individual fold rear seats make it versatile. Reliable and reasonably economical. Excellent autobox. Passenger seat reclines into a single bed.

    Search Good Garages