Toyota RAV4 MOT Results

Registered in 2000
58.6% pass rate
from 1,909 tests in 2020
(13% better than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota RAV4 is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (55% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 15% fail on Exhaust emissions (60% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 15% fail on Spark ignition (72% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 10% fail on Catalyst emissions (75% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 4.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.16% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.42% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.31% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.052% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.052% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.31% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.26% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.052% fail on Other leaks
  • 15% fail on Suspension (15% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.58% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.47% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.21% fail on Linkage
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.10% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.052% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 3.8% fail on Springs (41% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Coil springs (43% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on Coil spring (44% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.052% fail on Mounting
      • 0.16% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.5% fail on Sub-frames (98% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Sub-frame (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.4% fail on Suspension arms (73% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Suspension arm (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover (71% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint (94% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.47% fail on Wheel bearings (70% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.21% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.052% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.10% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.052% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.052% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.052% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.052% fail on Other suspension component
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (27% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.10% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.5% fail on Stop lamp (30% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (38% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (37% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.0% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.94% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.63% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.16% fail on Trailer electrical socket (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Horn
      • 0.052% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.73% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (49% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Rear fog lamp (49% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.73% fail on Rear fog lamp (48% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Direction indicators (80% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Flashing type (80% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Individual direction indicators (83% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Side repeaters (87% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.052% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.052% fail on Switch
    • 0.052% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 11% fail on Brakes (23% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Brake performance (45% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.63% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (58% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.84% fail on Rbt (sp) (76% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.73% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (72% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.63% fail on Rbt (sp) (74% better than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.37% fail on Service brake performance (64% better than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake imbalance (81% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.052% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.58% fail on Parking brake performance (62% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Rbt (64% better than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.52% fail on Parking brake performance (59% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Decelerometer (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.10% fail on Parking brake performance (26 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.052% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.052% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.052% fail on Lever
    • 3.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.68% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.68% fail on Lever
    • 0.58% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.42% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.16% fail on Pedal
    • 0.47% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.37% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.31% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.052% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.37% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (77% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Anti-lock braking system (74% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.10% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.052% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.052% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.052% fail on Other components
  • 8.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure (26% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.73% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.73% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.73% fail on Transmission (80% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Drive shafts (84% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.58% fail on Joints (83% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.052% fail on Joints
        • 0.052% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.052% fail on Belts
    • 0.68% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.31% fail on Tank
      • 0.26% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.052% fail on Hose
      • 0.052% fail on Pipe
    • 0.63% fail on Chassis
      • 0.63% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.63% fail on Towbar (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.21% fail on Seats
      • 0.21% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.16% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.16% fail on Body
      • 0.052% fail on Body condition
      • 0.052% fail on Panel
      • 0.052% fail on Other body component
    • 0.10% fail on Doors (80% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.052% fail on Door condition
      • 0.052% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.052% fail on Door condition
    • 0.052% fail on Cabs
      • 0.052% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.052% fail on Undertray
  • 6.8% fail on Visibility
    • 5.3% fail on Wipers
    • 1.1% fail on Washers (69% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.21% fail on View to rear
      • 0.21% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.052% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.052% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.052% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.8% fail on Tyres
    • 3.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.5% fail on Condition (39% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.052% fail on Size/type
  • 1.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (64% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Seat belts (47% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Prescribed areas (63% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Condition
    • 0.10% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (94% better than other 2000 cars)
  • 0.63% fail on Steering (85% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Power steering
      • 0.21% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.16% fail on Operation
      • 0.052% fail on Rams
      • 0.052% fail on Other components
    • 0.26% fail on Steering gear (74% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Steering rack (72% better than other 2000 cars)
  • 0.63% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.58% fail on Attachment
    • 0.052% fail on Condition
  • 0.42% fail on Identification of the vehicle (59% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Registration plates (58% better than other 2000 cars)
  • 0.10% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.10% fail on Anchorages (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)

Search Good Garages