Toyota RAV4 MOT Results
Registered in 200061.5% pass rate
from 2,160 tests in 2017
(22% better than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota RAV4 is unusually good or bad.
-
14% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(43% better than other 2000 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Position lamps
(34% better than other 2000 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Front lamps
- 0.32% fail on Rear lamps (83% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.14% fail on All position lamps
- 3.3% fail on Stop lamp (40% better than other 2000 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Registration plate lamp (48% better than other 2000 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim (58% better than other 2000 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Headlamps
(63% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Headlamp (61% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.046% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.046% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
-
1.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.4% fail on Fog lamp
- 1.0% fail on Battery
-
0.23% fail on
Direction indicators
(92% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Flashing type
(92% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Individual lamps (92% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.046% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.046% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.23% fail on
Flashing type
(92% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.093% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.093% fail on Horn (83% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.093% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.046% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.046% fail on Switch
-
4.3% fail on
Position lamps
(34% better than other 2000 cars)
-
13% fail on
Brakes
(23% better than other 2000 cars)
-
7.1% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
6.8% fail on
Components
- 4.0% fail on Pipes
- 3.1% fail on Hoses (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.19% fail on Leaks
- 0.093% fail on Operation
-
6.8% fail on
Components
-
4.6% fail on
Brake performance
(49% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance (59% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Front wheels (51% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Rear wheels (66% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.32% fail on Service brake performance (72% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.23% fail on Brake operation (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.046% fail on Parking brake operation
-
3.1% fail on
Hub components
- 2.4% fail on Brake pads
- 0.69% fail on Brake discs
- 0.19% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.093% fail on Brake back plates
-
0.97% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.97% fail on Condition
- 0.51% fail on ABS (63% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.093% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.093% fail on
Pedal
- 0.093% fail on Condition
-
0.093% fail on
Pedal
-
0.046% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.046% fail on Cable
-
0.046% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.046% fail on
Components
- 0.046% fail on Hoses
-
0.046% fail on
Components
- 0.046% fail on Locking devices
-
7.1% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
13% fail on
Suspension
(41% better than other 2000 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.4% fail on Condition
- 0.046% fail on Location
-
3.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(33% better than other 2000 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.32% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (66% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.093% fail on Linkage condition (84% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.046% fail on Attachment
-
2.9% fail on
Prescribed areas
(43% better than other 2000 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Component mounting (41% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Spring mounting
- 0.42% fail on Subframe mounting (57% better than other 2000 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Suspension arms
(68% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (95% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.093% fail on Attachment
-
1.3% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.3% fail on Condition
-
0.79% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.79% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Wheel bearings
(59% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Front
- 0.37% fail on Rear (69% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Drive shafts
(83% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Front drive shafts
(83% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Constant velocity joints (82% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Front drive shafts
(83% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.28% fail on Condition
- 0.14% fail on Front suspension joints (91% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.046% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.046% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
3.4% fail on
Coil springs
-
12% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 9.1% fail on Emissions (44% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Exhaust system (38% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.46% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.23% fail on Tank
- 0.14% fail on Cap
- 0.046% fail on Pipe
- 0.046% fail on System
-
7.5% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(22% better than other 2000 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Wipers
- 1.6% fail on Washers (56% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Windscreen
- 0.19% fail on Mirrors
- 0.093% fail on Bonnet
-
3.9% fail on
Tyres
(54% better than other 2000 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Tread depth (51% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Condition (56% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Valve stem
- 0.046% fail on Size/type
-
1.5% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(69% better than other 2000 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts
(56% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Prescribed areas (67% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Condition
- 0.093% fail on Attachment
- 0.046% fail on Requirements
-
0.046% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.046% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.046% fail on Passengers airbag
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts
(56% better than other 2000 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(63% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Body condition (55% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.46% fail on Chassis
-
0.19% fail on
Seats
- 0.19% fail on Passengers
- 0.046% fail on Drivers
-
0.14% fail on
Doors
(77% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.093% fail on Passengers other
- 0.046% fail on Passengers front
-
1.1% fail on
Steering
(76% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Power steering
- 0.28% fail on Operation
- 0.19% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.093% fail on Pump
- 0.046% fail on Drive system
- 0.046% fail on Other components
-
0.42% fail on
Steering system
(90% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Steering rack (78% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Track rod end (94% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.046% fail on
Free play
- 0.046% fail on Steering rack
- 0.093% fail on Locking devices
-
0.046% fail on
Steering control
- 0.046% fail on Steering lock
- 0.046% fail on Steering operation
-
0.56% fail on
Power steering
-
0.56% fail on
Towbars
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.046% fail on Towbar
-
0.42% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(68% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Registration plate (68% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.19% fail on Attachment