Toyota RAV4 MOT Results

Registered in 1998
56.4% pass rate
from 2,303 tests in 2017
(7.0% better than other 1998 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota RAV4 is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (20% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.8% fail on Front lamps (42% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Rear lamps (90% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.5% fail on Stop lamp (32% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (52% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Battery (60% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.1% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.087% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.043% fail on Switch
    • 1.00% fail on Headlamps (70% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Headlamp (72% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.043% fail on Switch
      • 0.043% fail on Dipswitch
    • 0.74% fail on Direction indicators (73% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Flashing type (73% better than other 1998 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Individual lamps (75% better than other 1998 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.087% fail on Side repeaters (88% better than other 1998 cars)
        • 0.087% fail on Switch
    • 0.17% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.17% fail on Horn (74% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.13% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 17% fail on Suspension (14% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 5.8% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.52% fail on Subframe mounting (58% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Spring mounting
    • 5.0% fail on Drive shafts
      • 5.0% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 5.0% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 0.087% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.087% fail on Drive shafts
    • 4.5% fail on Coil springs (120% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on Location
    • 1.4% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms (64% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (90% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (63% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (71% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (63% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage condition
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
      • 0.043% fail on Fitment
    • 0.35% fail on Wheel bearings (80% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Front
    • 0.30% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
    • 0.26% fail on Front suspension joints (80% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.087% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.043% fail on Condition
      • 0.043% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.043% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.043% fail on Attachment
    • 0.043% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.043% fail on Condition
    • 0.043% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 13% fail on Brakes (20% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Hydraulic systems (31% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 7.9% fail on Components (36% worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 5.3% fail on Hoses (180% worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Pipes (27% better than other 1998 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.22% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.22% fail on Leaks
      • 0.043% fail on Operation
    • 3.0% fail on Brake performance (66% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Front wheels (45% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Rear wheels (87% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.30% fail on Parking brake performance (93% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Service brake performance (86% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.087% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.043% fail on Parking brake operation
    • 2.0% fail on Hub components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.39% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.13% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.1% fail on ABS
    • 0.22% fail on Parking brake (78% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Condition (78% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.22% fail on Pedal
        • 0.13% fail on Condition
        • 0.087% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.17% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.043% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.043% fail on Cable
    • 0.043% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.043% fail on Components
        • 0.043% fail on Servos
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 8.7% fail on Emissions (33% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.74% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.35% fail on Tank
      • 0.30% fail on Cap
      • 0.043% fail on Pipe
      • 0.043% fail on System
    • 0.69% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 6.3% fail on Driver's view of the road (30% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Wipers
    • 1.2% fail on Washers (64% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.13% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.087% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.7% fail on Tyres (36% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Tread depth (29% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Condition (49% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.043% fail on Size/type
    • 0.043% fail on Valve stem
  • 2.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (56% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Seat belts (43% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Prescribed areas (53% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Condition
      • 0.087% fail on Attachment
    • 0.043% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.043% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 2.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (46% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Body condition (49% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.1% fail on Chassis
    • 0.22% fail on Seats
      • 0.17% fail on Passengers
      • 0.043% fail on Drivers
    • 0.043% fail on Doors
      • 0.043% fail on Passengers front
  • 1.4% fail on Steering (67% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.96% fail on Power steering
      • 0.43% fail on Operation (170% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Other components
      • 0.22% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.13% fail on Drive system (6 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.043% fail on Pump
    • 0.39% fail on Steering system (89% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Steering rack (85% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on Track rod end (96% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.087% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.043% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.17% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.043% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.83% fail on Towbars (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.043% fail on Towbar
  • 0.61% fail on Registration plates and VIN (56% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Registration plate (56% better than other 1998 cars)
  • 0.22% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.22% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages