Toyota RAV4 MOT Results

Registered in 1994
51.4% pass rate
from 249 tests in 2020
(28% worse than other 1994 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota RAV4 is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (150% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 19% fail on Exhaust emissions (170% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 19% fail on Spark ignition (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 16% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 1.2% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 2.0% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.6% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.40% fail on Other leaks
  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.8% fail on Electrical equipment (150% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Horn (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 4.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 4.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.40% fail on Switch
    • 2.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.8% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.40% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.40% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.40% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.80% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.80% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.80% fail on Individual direction indicators
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 4.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.0% fail on Springs (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Coil springs (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on Coil spring (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.8% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.80% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.40% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.6% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.80% fail on Sub-frame (6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.40% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.2% fail on Macpherson strut (4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (8 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.80% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.40% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.40% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.40% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.6% fail on Transmission
      • 2.8% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.8% fail on Joints
      • 0.80% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.80% fail on Joints
    • 1.6% fail on Body
      • 1.2% fail on Other body component (5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Panel
    • 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.80% fail on Chassis
      • 0.80% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.80% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.40% fail on Tank
      • 0.40% fail on Pipe
    • 0.80% fail on Towbar
      • 0.80% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.80% fail on Seats
      • 0.40% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.40% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 9.2% fail on Brakes
    • 4.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.80% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.40% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.40% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.80% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.40% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.80% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.80% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.40% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.40% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.40% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.40% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
    • 2.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.40% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.40% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.40% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.40% fail on Cable
    • 0.80% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.40% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.40% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.40% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.40% fail on Brake fluid
  • 5.2% fail on Visibility
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers
    • 1.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.40% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.40% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
      • 0.80% fail on Attachment (14 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres
    • 3.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.80% fail on Condition
  • 2.4% fail on Steering
    • 1.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.2% fail on Power steering
      • 0.80% fail on Operation (6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.40% fail on Pump
  • 0.80% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.80% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.40% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.40% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages