Toyota Previa MOT Results

Registered in 2017
68.0% pass rate
from 559 tests in 2021
(150% worse than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Previa is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (50 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 7.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (50 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 7.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (50 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Switch
    • 5.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (23 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamps (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim (120% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.89% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (19 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Stop lamp (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.72% fail on Individual direction indicators (10 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.36% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (101 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (124 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Electrical equipment (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Battery(ies) (30 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 9.3% fail on Suspension (9 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (49 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (183 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover (122 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Linkage (32 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint (19 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.89% fail on Suspension arms (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint dust cover (13 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Axles (69 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (74 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Shock absorbers (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Wheel bearings (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Springs
      • 0.36% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.36% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.18% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 5.7% fail on Brakes (180% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (94% worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Brake linings and pads (130% worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Brake pads (130% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Brake performance (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.89% fail on Rbt
          • 0.89% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.72% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Brake performance not tested (9 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Parking brake performance (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Rbt (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.36% fail on Parking brake performance (8 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.18% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 0.54% fail on Parking brake control (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Lever (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Rigid brake pipes (31 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.36% fail on Anti-lock braking system (11 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.18% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.18% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.18% fail on Brake fluid
  • 5.4% fail on Visibility
    • 3.6% fail on Wipers
    • 2.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.36% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.36% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.7% fail on Tyres
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
  • 3.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure (9 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Engine mounting (271 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Engine mounting condition (353 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Transmission (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Drive shafts (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.72% fail on Joints (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Doors (20 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Other passenger's door (45 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.72% fail on Door condition (47 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Exhaust system (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Bumpers (27 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.18% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.18% fail on Body
      • 0.18% fail on Other body component
    • 0.18% fail on Seats
      • 0.18% fail on Driver's seat
  • 2.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust emissions (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Spark ignition (8 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Catalyst emissions (9 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Emissions not tested (18 times worse than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Non catalyst emissions
  • 1.1% fail on Steering (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Steering linkage components (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Locking devices (216 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.18% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.18% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.18% fail on Power steering
      • 0.18% fail on Operation
    • 0.18% fail on Steering play
      • 0.18% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.1% fail on Road Wheels (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Attachment (9 times worse than other 2017 cars)
  • 0.89% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment
      • 0.18% fail on Requirements
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
    • 0.36% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.72% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.72% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages