Toyota Previa MOT Results
Registered in 201669.6% pass rate
from 733 tests in 2021
(88% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Previa is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
7.2% fail on
Headlamps
(8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 7.2% fail on Headlamp (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(36 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(36 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 7.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (36 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(36 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (11 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.55% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Stop lamp (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.27% fail on Battery(ies) (19 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.14% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.14% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.14% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.14% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.14% fail on Switch
-
7.2% fail on
Headlamps
(8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Suspension
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(22 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (61 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover (66 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Pins and bushes (36 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.14% fail on Linkage
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint
-
1.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(150% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.41% fail on Ball joint dust cover (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Ball joint
- 0.14% fail on Suspension arm
-
0.95% fail on
Axles
(28 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (30 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Other suspension component
(10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.14% fail on
Springs
-
0.14% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.14% fail on Coil spring
-
0.14% fail on
Coil springs
-
4.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(22 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Visibility
- 3.5% fail on Wipers
- 1.9% fail on Washers
-
0.27% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.27% fail on Windscreen
-
4.5% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Engine mounting
(222 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Engine mounting condition (273 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Bracket
-
1.1% fail on
Doors
(29 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Other passenger's door
(56 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Door condition (58 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Other passenger's door
(56 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.82% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.82% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.82% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Bumpers (23 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.27% fail on
Fuel system
(5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.14% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
0.14% fail on
Seats
- 0.14% fail on Driver's seat
-
1.1% fail on
Engine mounting
(222 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Tyres
- 2.2% fail on Condition
- 2.2% fail on Tread depth
- 0.14% fail on Size/type
-
3.4% fail on
Brakes
-
2.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.2% fail on Brake pads
-
0.27% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.27% fail on Brake discs
-
2.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.68% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.27% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.27% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.14% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.14% fail on
Rbt
- 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.14% fail on
Rbt
-
0.14% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.14% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.14% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.14% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.14% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.14% fail on
Rbt
- 0.14% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.14% fail on
Rbt
-
0.27% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.27% fail on Rigid brake pipes (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.14% fail on Lever
-
0.14% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.14% fail on Brake fluid
-
2.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.0% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Spark ignition
(5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Spark ignition
(5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Steering
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.55% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.27% fail on Track rod end
-
0.14% fail on
Other components
- 0.14% fail on Steering linkage
- 0.14% fail on Locking devices
-
0.41% fail on
Steering gear
(14 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Steering rack (14 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Steering play
(57 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Steering rack (61 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.55% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.95% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.95% fail on
Seat belts
(4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Requirements
-
0.95% fail on
Seat belts
(4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.27% fail on Registration plates