MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Previa » 2009

Toyota Previa MOT Results

Registered in 2009
79.7% pass rate
from 745 tests in 2021
(46% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Previa is unusually good or bad.

  • 10% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 5.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.13% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.27% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.2% fail on Stop lamp (65% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Direction indicators (66% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Flashing type (66% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.27% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.40% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.27% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.13% fail on Horn
    • 0.13% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.13% fail on Switch
  • 4.2% fail on Suspension (72% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.40% fail on Linkage
      • 0.27% fail on Linkage ball joints (79% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Suspension arms (86% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.27% fail on Pins and bushes (86% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.27% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.27% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.13% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 4.0% fail on Visibility
    • 3.0% fail on Wipers
    • 1.3% fail on Washers (56% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 3.9% fail on Brakes (56% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Brake performance (60% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.40% fail on Service brake performance (84% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on Rbt (83% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.40% fail on Service brake performance (81% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.40% fail on Rbt
          • 0.40% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.13% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.13% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
    • 1.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.27% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.27% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.40% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.27% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.27% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.13% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.13% fail on Pedal
    • 0.13% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.13% fail on Lever
    • 0.13% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.13% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.13% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 2.1% fail on Tyres (65% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.81% fail on Tread depth (77% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Size/type
  • 2.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (57% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.81% fail on Transmission
      • 0.54% fail on Drive shafts (71% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.54% fail on Joints (70% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.13% fail on Joints
        • 0.13% fail on Bearing housing
    • 0.54% fail on Exhaust system (73% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Doors
      • 0.27% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.27% fail on Door condition
      • 0.13% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.13% fail on Catch
      • 0.13% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.13% fail on Door condition
    • 0.27% fail on Chassis (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Chassis condition (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 1.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (63% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (61% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.81% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.54% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.27% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.13% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.13% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.54% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.40% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.40% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.40% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.40% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.40% fail on Steering (83% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.13% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.13% fail on Power steering
      • 0.13% fail on Other components
    • 0.13% fail on Steering play
      • 0.13% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.27% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.27% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages