Toyota Previa MOT Results
Registered in 200557.6% pass rate
from 1,114 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Previa is unusually good or bad.
-
19% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
9.4% fail on
Headlamps
(82% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 9.4% fail on Headlamp (90% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.090% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 5.8% fail on Stop lamp (42% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
(45% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim (60% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.7% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.81% fail on
Direction indicators
(69% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.81% fail on
Flashing type
(69% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.36% fail on Individual direction indicators (80% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.81% fail on
Flashing type
(69% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.45% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.090% fail on Horn
-
0.090% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.090% fail on Position lamp
-
0.090% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.090% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
9.4% fail on
Headlamps
(82% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
12% fail on
Suspension
(32% better than other 2005 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Suspension arms
(35% better than other 2005 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.54% fail on Ball joint (77% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 3.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (91% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(38% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.81% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.27% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.27% fail on Ball joint
- 0.27% fail on Linkage ball joints (83% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.090% fail on Linkage
- 0.090% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.99% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.90% fail on
Axles
(3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.90% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.81% fail on
Springs
(83% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.72% fail on
Coil springs
(85% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Coil spring (84% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.090% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.72% fail on
Coil springs
(85% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.63% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.63% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Wheel bearings (69% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.090% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.090% fail on Pins and bushes
-
3.9% fail on
Suspension arms
(35% better than other 2005 cars)
-
10% fail on
Brakes
(22% better than other 2005 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Brake performance
(27% better than other 2005 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
1.6% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt
- 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.27% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.090% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.090% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt
-
1.5% fail on
Service brake performance
(49% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
(50% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (53% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.090% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.090% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
(50% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.45% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.36% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.36% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.45% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.090% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
3.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.8% fail on Brake pads
- 0.090% fail on Brake linings
-
0.63% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.63% fail on Brake discs
-
0.18% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.18% fail on Cable
-
2.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.54% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.54% fail on Lever
-
0.45% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.27% fail on Hand lever
- 0.18% fail on Pedal
-
0.36% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(75% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Anti-lock braking system (70% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.18% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.090% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.090% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
5.4% fail on
Brake performance
(27% better than other 2005 cars)
-
9.0% fail on
Visibility
- 6.4% fail on Wipers (69% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Washers
-
0.27% fail on
View to rear
- 0.18% fail on Mirrors
- 0.090% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
0.18% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.18% fail on Windscreen
-
7.6% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 2.6% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.3% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.99% fail on
Transmission
(72% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.99% fail on
Drive shafts
(71% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.99% fail on Joints (70% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.99% fail on
Drive shafts
(71% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.63% fail on
Chassis
- 0.63% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.36% fail on
Doors
-
0.36% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.36% fail on Door condition
-
0.36% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.27% fail on Bumpers
-
0.18% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.090% fail on Tank
- 0.090% fail on System
-
0.18% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.18% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.18% fail on
Body
- 0.18% fail on Other body component
-
0.18% fail on
Seats
- 0.18% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.090% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.090% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
0.090% fail on
Cabs
- 0.090% fail on Prescribed areas
-
6.1% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
6.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.6% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 2.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.63% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.090% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
1.4% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.90% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.27% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.18% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.090% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
4.6% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.36% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.27% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.090% fail on Other leaks
-
0.090% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.090% fail on Sound deadening material
-
6.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.2% fail on
Tyres
- 3.1% fail on Tread depth
- 2.4% fail on Condition
- 0.090% fail on Size/type
-
2.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
1.6% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.99% fail on Condition
- 0.54% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.090% fail on Attachment
- 0.72% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.6% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.4% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(120% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Registration plates (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Steering
(68% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Steering linkage components
(81% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Track rod end (79% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.36% fail on Steering rack
-
0.36% fail on
Power steering
- 0.18% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.090% fail on Operation
- 0.090% fail on Pump
-
0.54% fail on
Steering linkage components
(81% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.72% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.72% fail on Attachment
-
0.090% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.090% fail on Belt(s)/padding