Toyota Previa MOT Results

Registered in 2003
54.4% pass rate
from 1,996 tests in 2017
(6.1% better than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Previa is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (9.6% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 8.7% fail on Registration plate lamp (23% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Stop lamp (41% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Headlamps (54% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Headlamp (60% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 7.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.80% fail on Rear lamps (58% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on All position lamps
    • 7.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (60% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Fog lamp (54% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Tell tale (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Switch
    • 1.1% fail on Battery
    • 0.65% fail on Direction indicators (77% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Flashing type (77% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Side repeaters (62% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Individual lamps (86% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.30% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.25% fail on Rear reflectors (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Horn
    • 0.20% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.20% fail on Lamp
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 9.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.1% fail on Parking brake performance (41% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.7% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.55% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.25% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.10% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.6% fail on Hub components (43% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Brake pads (74% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Brake discs (62% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.050% fail on Brake back plates
    • 3.2% fail on Hydraulic systems (48% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Components (46% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Pipes (33% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Hoses (81% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.050% fail on Operation
      • 0.050% fail on Leaks
    • 0.85% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.85% fail on Condition
    • 0.65% fail on ABS
    • 0.15% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.15% fail on Pedal
        • 0.10% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.050% fail on Condition
    • 0.10% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.10% fail on Cable
    • 0.10% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.10% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings (22 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.050% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.050% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
    • 0.050% fail on Restricted movement
  • 14% fail on Suspension (34% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.85% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.10% fail on Linkage condition (79% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Attachment
    • 2.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.5% fail on Component mounting (49% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.050% fail on Spring mounting
    • 2.5% fail on Shock absorbers (75% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Condition (75% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Suspension arms (50% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (47% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Drive shafts (60% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Front drive shafts (60% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Constant velocity joints (59% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.80% fail on Front
      • 0.30% fail on Rear (71% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Trailing arms (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Attachment
    • 0.60% fail on Front suspension joints (61% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.25% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Condition
    • 0.25% fail on Coil springs (94% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Condition (94% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.15% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.10% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.10% fail on Condition
    • 0.10% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.10% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.10% fail on Axles
      • 0.050% fail on Axle beam
      • 0.050% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 0.050% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.050% fail on Suspension unit
  • 8.6% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.1% fail on Wipers
    • 2.1% fail on Washers (42% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.25% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.9% fail on Tyres
    • 4.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.30% fail on Size/type
    • 0.10% fail on Valve stem
  • 5.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (30% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Emissions
    • 1.7% fail on Exhaust system (61% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.40% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.30% fail on Cap
      • 0.050% fail on Pipe
      • 0.050% fail on System
  • 3.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.2% fail on Body condition
    • 0.50% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.50% fail on Chassis
    • 0.40% fail on Seats
      • 0.35% fail on Passengers (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Drivers
    • 0.35% fail on Engine mountings (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Doors
      • 0.30% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.10% fail on Drivers
      • 0.050% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.25% fail on Spare wheel (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.050% fail on Load security
      • 0.050% fail on Bootlid
  • 2.0% fail on Steering (61% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Steering system (66% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.40% fail on Track rod end (88% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Free play
        • 0.20% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.050% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.35% fail on Power steering
      • 0.15% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.10% fail on Pump
      • 0.050% fail on Operation
      • 0.050% fail on Other components
    • 0.20% fail on Locking devices (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 1.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (54% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.65% fail on Condition
      • 0.55% fail on Prescribed areas (54% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Requirements
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment
    • 0.10% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (93% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (93% better than other 2003 cars)
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate
    • 0.050% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.70% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.60% fail on Attachment
    • 0.10% fail on Condition
  • 0.050% fail on Towbars
    • 0.050% fail on Vehicle structure

Search Good Garages