Toyota Previa MOT Results

Registered in 2002
52.9% pass rate
from 1,696 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Previa is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (20% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 9.8% fail on Stop lamp (68% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Headlamps (46% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 7.7% fail on Headlamp (59% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (82% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.77% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.9% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.059% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Switch
    • 0.83% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.59% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.12% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.059% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.059% fail on Horn
    • 0.59% fail on Direction indicators (75% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Flashing type (75% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Individual direction indicators (78% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Side repeaters (76% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.059% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.12% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.059% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.059% fail on Switch
    • 0.059% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.059% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 8.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.059% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 2.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.47% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.059% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.059% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.24% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.12% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.059% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.059% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.83% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (60% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.83% fail on Rbt (sp) (60% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.59% fail on Service brake imbalance (59% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.41% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (71% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 5.4% fail on Brake pads (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.59% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.059% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.12% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.059% fail on Cable
        • 0.059% fail on Lever
    • 2.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (39% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (62% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Anti-lock braking system (55% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.18% fail on Pedal
      • 0.18% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.35% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.35% fail on Lever
    • 0.29% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.24% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.059% fail on Servos
    • 0.24% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.24% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.12% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 13% fail on Suspension (28% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.53% fail on Linkage ball joints (68% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Linkage
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.059% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.059% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 3.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.9% fail on Suspension arms (52% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.47% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.35% fail on Ball joint (87% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Shock absorbers (62% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Springs (86% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Coil springs (86% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.47% fail on Coil spring (86% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Axles
      • 0.29% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
      • 0.059% fail on Axle
      • 0.059% fail on Stub axle
    • 0.29% fail on Wheel bearings (81% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.18% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.12% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.059% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.24% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.059% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.059% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 12% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (51% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 12% fail on Exhaust emissions (57% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 11% fail on Spark ignition (65% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 6.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 4.6% fail on Catalyst emissions (39% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.18% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.059% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.059% fail on NOx sensor
      • 1.2% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.59% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.29% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.18% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.059% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.059% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.059% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.059% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 0.59% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.59% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 9.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.4% fail on Exhaust system (38% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Transmission (41% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Drive shafts (42% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Joints (43% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.059% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.24% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.24% fail on Joints
    • 1.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Doors (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Other passenger's door (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Door condition (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.059% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.059% fail on Door condition
    • 0.88% fail on Chassis
      • 0.83% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.059% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.53% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.41% fail on Spare wheel (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Spare wheel condition (27 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.059% fail on Carrier
    • 0.35% fail on Body
      • 0.24% fail on Other body component
      • 0.059% fail on Body condition
      • 0.059% fail on Panel
    • 0.24% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.12% fail on Tank
      • 0.059% fail on Pipe
      • 0.059% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.12% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.12% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.059% fail on Towbar
      • 0.059% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.059% fail on Cabs
      • 0.059% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.059% fail on Undertray
  • 9.1% fail on Visibility
    • 6.4% fail on Wipers (40% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.53% fail on Driver's view (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.12% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.12% fail on View to rear
      • 0.12% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.059% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.4% fail on Tyres
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.35% fail on Size/type
  • 1.9% fail on Steering (60% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on Steering linkage components (77% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Track rod end (80% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.59% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.59% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.47% fail on Power steering
      • 0.29% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.24% fail on Operation
    • 0.059% fail on Steering play
      • 0.059% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (53% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
      • 0.65% fail on Prescribed areas (59% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (89% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.059% fail on Airbags
      • 0.059% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.65% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.59% fail on Attachment
    • 0.059% fail on Condition
  • 0.059% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.059% fail on Speed limiter
      • 0.059% fail on Speed limiter

Search Good Garages