Toyota Previa MOT Results

Registered in 2002
53.1% pass rate
from 1,864 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Previa is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (11% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 9.8% fail on Stop lamp (53% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 9.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (33% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 8.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 7.4% fail on Front lamps (33% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Rear lamps (57% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on All position lamps
    • 7.0% fail on Headlamps (46% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.9% fail on Headlamp (50% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.054% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 6.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Fog lamp (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Tell tale (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Switch (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Battery
    • 0.32% fail on Direction indicators (88% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Flashing type (88% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Side repeaters (72% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.054% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.054% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.27% fail on Horn
    • 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.11% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.054% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.054% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 7.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.7% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.1% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.4% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.38% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.16% fail on Service brake performance (81% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.11% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.4% fail on Hub components (66% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Brake pads (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Brake discs (71% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Brake calipers
    • 3.3% fail on Hydraulic systems (48% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Components (50% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Pipes (42% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Hoses (66% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.054% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.21% fail on Leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.054% fail on Operation
    • 0.97% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.97% fail on Condition
    • 0.80% fail on ABS
    • 0.32% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.054% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.054% fail on Pedal
        • 0.054% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.054% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.054% fail on Cable
  • 13% fail on Suspension (42% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 3.6% fail on Component mounting (43% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.16% fail on Spring mounting
    • 3.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (39% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.48% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.054% fail on Linkage condition
    • 2.7% fail on Shock absorbers (88% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Condition (88% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Drive shafts (60% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Front drive shafts (62% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Constant velocity joints (64% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Couplings
      • 0.11% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.054% fail on Universal joint
        • 0.054% fail on Drive shafts
    • 1.4% fail on Suspension arms (71% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (70% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Condition
    • 0.64% fail on Wheel bearings (64% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Front
      • 0.054% fail on Rear
    • 0.48% fail on Coil springs (88% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Condition (89% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Location
    • 0.43% fail on Front suspension joints (72% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.27% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.054% fail on Attachment
    • 0.27% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.27% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.16% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.16% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.11% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 0.054% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.054% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.054% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.054% fail on Condition
  • 8.5% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.7% fail on Wipers
    • 2.5% fail on Washers (33% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.16% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.054% fail on Bonnet
  • 8.0% fail on Tyres
    • 4.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.54% fail on Size/type
    • 0.054% fail on Valve stem
  • 7.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.6% fail on Emissions (63% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Exhaust system (47% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.27% fail on Fuel system (67% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Tank
      • 0.11% fail on Pipe
      • 0.054% fail on System
  • 4.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (63% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Body condition (63% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Doors (95% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Passengers other (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.80% fail on Chassis
    • 0.38% fail on Engine mountings (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.054% fail on Body security
    • 0.054% fail on Seats
      • 0.054% fail on Passengers
    • 0.054% fail on Load security
      • 0.054% fail on Tailgate
  • 2.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (42% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.64% fail on Condition
      • 0.16% fail on Requirements
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment
    • 0.38% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (78% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (80% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 2.0% fail on Steering (60% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Steering system (73% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.54% fail on Track rod end (82% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Free play
        • 0.16% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.054% fail on Other components
        • 0.054% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.54% fail on Power steering
      • 0.32% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.16% fail on Operation
      • 0.054% fail on Other components
    • 0.27% fail on Locking devices (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.054% fail on Steering operation
  • 1.7% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.2% fail on Road Wheels (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 0.11% fail on Towbars
    • 0.054% fail on Towbar
    • 0.054% fail on Vehicle structure

Search Good Garages