Toyota Previa MOT Results

Registered in 2000
48.9% pass rate
from 936 tests in 2020
(9.9% worse than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Previa is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (35% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 9.9% fail on Stop lamp (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Headlamps (56% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Headlamp (65% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 4.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Switch (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.4% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.11% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.32% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.85% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.11% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.11% fail on Horn
    • 0.64% fail on Direction indicators (73% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Flashing type (73% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Individual direction indicators (79% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.11% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.11% fail on Switch
  • 22% fail on Brakes (51% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (90% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 12% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 4.5% fail on Parking brake performance (200% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 3.8% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.64% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.11% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.32% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.96% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (61% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.75% fail on Rbt (sp) (69% better than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.53% fail on Service brake imbalance (68% better than other 2000 cars)
          • 0.43% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.21% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Brake linings and pads (200% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 5.7% fail on Brake pads (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.75% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.75% fail on Brake discs
    • 4.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.85% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.85% fail on Lever
    • 0.64% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.64% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.32% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.21% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.11% fail on Pedal
    • 0.32% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.21% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.11% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.21% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.21% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.11% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.11% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 17% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (75% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 17% fail on Exhaust emissions (81% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 16% fail on Spark ignition (92% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 9.6% fail on Catalyst emissions (65% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 7.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.21% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.32% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.21% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.11% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.53% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.32% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.21% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 4.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Linkage ball joints (74% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.11% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 2.7% fail on Suspension arms (49% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint (91% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.5% fail on Shock absorbers (75% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.85% fail on Springs (68% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Coil springs (75% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Coil spring (83% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Mounting
      • 0.43% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.53% fail on Wheel bearings (66% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.32% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.32% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.11% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.21% fail on Axles
      • 0.11% fail on King pins
      • 0.11% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.11% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.11% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.11% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.11% fail on Suspension unit
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.0% fail on Doors (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Other passenger's door (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Door condition (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Catch
      • 0.21% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
        • 0.11% fail on Catch
      • 0.21% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.21% fail on Door condition
    • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.11% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.11% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 1.3% fail on Transmission (66% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Drive shafts (67% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Joints (69% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.11% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.11% fail on Joints
      • 0.11% fail on Belts
    • 0.75% fail on Chassis
      • 0.75% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.64% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.53% fail on Engine mounting (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Engine mounting condition (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Bracket
    • 0.43% fail on Body
      • 0.32% fail on Panel
      • 0.32% fail on Other body component
    • 0.43% fail on Seats
      • 0.21% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.21% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.32% fail on Spare wheel (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Carrier (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.32% fail on Cabs (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.21% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.11% fail on Towbar
      • 0.11% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 9.9% fail on Visibility
    • 6.8% fail on Wipers (51% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.64% fail on View to rear
      • 0.64% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.21% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.21% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.9% fail on Tyres
    • 5.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.85% fail on Size/type (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 2.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (50% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
      • 0.75% fail on Prescribed areas (67% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Requirements
    • 0.32% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (80% better than other 2000 cars)
  • 1.7% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.75% fail on Steering (82% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Steering gear (78% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.21% fail on Steering linkage components (92% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.11% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.21% fail on Power steering
      • 0.21% fail on Pump (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Operation
      • 0.11% fail on Other components
    • 0.11% fail on Steering column
  • 0.75% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.75% fail on Attachment (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 0.11% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.11% fail on Anchorages

Search Good Garages