Toyota Previa MOT Results

Registered in 2000
50.0% pass rate
from 1,061 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Previa is unusually good or bad.

  • 32% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (30% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 11% fail on Registration plate lamp (85% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 10% fail on Position lamps (55% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 8.5% fail on Front lamps (76% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Rear lamps
    • 9.5% fail on Stop lamp (70% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.0% fail on Headlamps (40% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.9% fail on Headlamp (43% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.094% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 4.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Fog lamp (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.094% fail on Switch
    • 1.3% fail on Battery
    • 0.57% fail on Direction indicators (79% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Flashing type (79% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.19% fail on Individual lamps (89% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Horn
    • 0.19% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.094% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 22% fail on Brakes (27% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (66% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 12% fail on Parking brake performance (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Rear wheels (83% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.47% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.28% fail on Service brake performance (76% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.094% fail on Brake operation
    • 5.7% fail on Hub components (93% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Brake pads (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.094% fail on Brake calipers
    • 4.7% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 4.2% fail on Components
        • 3.4% fail on Pipes
        • 0.85% fail on Hoses
        • 0.094% fail on Valves
      • 0.28% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.28% fail on Leaks
    • 2.7% fail on Parking brake (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.19% fail on Pedal
        • 0.19% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.19% fail on ABS (86% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.094% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.094% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.094% fail on Linkage
    • 0.094% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.094% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 13% fail on Suspension (42% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.94% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.19% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.094% fail on Condition
    • 2.5% fail on Prescribed areas (50% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Component mounting (38% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 2.2% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Suspension arms (65% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (67% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Condition
      • 0.094% fail on Attachment
    • 0.75% fail on Coil springs (76% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Condition (75% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Location
    • 0.57% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.57% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.57% fail on Drive shafts (87% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Front drive shafts (89% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.47% fail on Constant velocity joints (89% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.094% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.47% fail on Wheel bearings (75% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Front
      • 0.19% fail on Rear (84% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Front suspension joints (81% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.19% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.19% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.094% fail on Condition
      • 0.094% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.19% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.094% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.094% fail on Condition
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 9.0% fail on Emissions (43% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.19% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.19% fail on Cap
  • 10% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 8.0% fail on Wipers (43% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.47% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.28% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.094% fail on Bonnet
  • 8.9% fail on Tyres
    • 5.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.47% fail on Size/type
  • 5.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (52% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Doors (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Passengers other (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Drivers
    • 0.66% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.66% fail on Chassis
    • 0.47% fail on Body security (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Body condition (73% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Seats
      • 0.19% fail on Passengers
      • 0.094% fail on Drivers
    • 0.28% fail on Spare wheel (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.094% fail on Engine mountings
  • 1.4% fail on Steering (70% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Steering system (74% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.28% fail on Track rod end (89% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.094% fail on Other components
        • 0.094% fail on Steering component
    • 0.38% fail on Power steering
      • 0.19% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.094% fail on Operation
      • 0.094% fail on Rams
    • 0.094% fail on Locking devices
  • 1.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (74% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Seat belts (70% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Condition
      • 0.47% fail on Prescribed areas (83% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (83% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (82% better than other 2000 cars)
  • 1.3% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.28% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.28% fail on Attachment
  • 0.094% fail on Towbars
    • 0.094% fail on Towbar

Search Good Garages