Toyota Previa MOT Results
Registered in 200051.9% pass rate
from 345 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Previa is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Brakes
(59% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(86% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
12% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 12% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
5.2% fail on
Parking brake performance
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.58% fail on
Plate brake tester
(12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Parking brake performance (30 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
- 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.29% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.29% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.29% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
-
0.58% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.58% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.29% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.29% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.58% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.29% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
12% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(150% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Brake pads (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.87% fail on Brake discs
- 0.29% fail on Brake drums
-
0.58% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.58% fail on Cable
-
4.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.4% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Hand lever (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.58% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.58% fail on Lever
- 0.58% fail on Load sensing valves
-
0.58% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.58% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.29% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.29% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.29% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.29% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.29% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.29% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
-
0.29% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(86% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
20% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(37% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 8.1% fail on Stop lamp (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Headlamps
(95% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 7.8% fail on Headlamp (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 3.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.58% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.7% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.4% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.29% fail on Electrical wiring
-
1.2% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.58% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.58% fail on Position lamp
-
0.58% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.58% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
0.29% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.29% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.29% fail on Switch
-
0.29% fail on
Flashing type
-
16% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(83% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
16% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(91% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
15% fail on
Spark ignition
(96% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 10% fail on Catalyst emissions (94% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.29% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.87% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.29% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.29% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.29% fail on Emissions not tested
-
15% fail on
Spark ignition
(96% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.58% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.58% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.29% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.29% fail on Sound deadening material
-
16% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(91% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
15% fail on
Suspension
- 5.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
5.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 3.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.29% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
-
4.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.8% fail on Pins and bushes (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.29% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
1.2% fail on
Axles
(4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Springs
-
1.2% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.58% fail on Coil spring
- 0.58% fail on Mounting (10 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.87% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.87% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.58% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.29% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.29% fail on Wheel bearings
-
11% fail on
Visibility
- 8.4% fail on Wipers (92% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Washers
-
10% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
3.2% fail on
Doors
(5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Other passenger's door
(8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Door condition (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.58% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.58% fail on Door condition
-
0.29% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.29% fail on Door condition
-
2.3% fail on
Other passenger's door
(8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 2.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
2.0% fail on
Chassis
- 2.0% fail on Chassis condition
- 2.0% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.2% fail on
Engine mounting
(15 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Engine mounting condition (18 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.58% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.58% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.29% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.29% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
0.29% fail on
Transmission
-
0.29% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.29% fail on Joints
-
0.29% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.29% fail on
Body
- 0.29% fail on Other body component
-
0.29% fail on
Seats
- 0.29% fail on Passenger's seat
-
3.2% fail on
Doors
(5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Tyres
- 2.9% fail on Condition
- 2.0% fail on Tread depth
- 0.29% fail on Size/type
-
2.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
2.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.87% fail on Condition
-
2.3% fail on
Seat belts
-
2.0% fail on
Steering
-
0.87% fail on
Power steering
- 0.87% fail on Operation (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.58% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.29% fail on Track rod end
- 0.29% fail on Locking devices
-
0.29% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.29% fail on Steering rack
-
0.29% fail on
Steering play
- 0.29% fail on Steering rack
-
0.87% fail on
Power steering
-
0.87% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.87% fail on Registration plates
-
0.29% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.29% fail on Attachment