Toyota Previa MOT Results

Registered in 1999
52.9% pass rate
from 278 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Previa is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (43% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 11% fail on Stop lamp (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Position lamps (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Position lamp (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 6.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.72% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.4% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.4% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 5.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.72% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.72% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.36% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 3.6% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Springs
      • 1.8% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.8% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.36% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.36% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 7.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.72% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.72% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.36% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.36% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.36% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 4.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 4.7% fail on Brake pads (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.72% fail on Cable
    • 2.2% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Pedal (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.4% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.72% fail on Lever
      • 0.36% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 1.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.72% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.72% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.36% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.36% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.36% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 13% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 12% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 12% fail on Spark ignition
        • 9.4% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 2.9% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.36% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.36% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.72% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.36% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.36% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 1.1% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.1% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 12% fail on Visibility
    • 10% fail on Wipers (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.36% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.36% fail on View to rear
      • 0.36% fail on Mirrors
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.4% fail on Chassis
      • 1.4% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.4% fail on Body
      • 1.1% fail on Panel (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Other body component
    • 1.1% fail on Transmission
      • 0.72% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.72% fail on Joints
      • 0.36% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.36% fail on Joints
    • 1.1% fail on Seats
      • 0.72% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.36% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.72% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.72% fail on Doors
      • 0.36% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.36% fail on Door condition
      • 0.36% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.36% fail on Door condition
    • 0.36% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.36% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.36% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.36% fail on Spare wheel condition
  • 5.0% fail on Tyres
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.1% fail on Condition
  • 2.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.72% fail on Condition
  • 1.1% fail on Steering (73% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.36% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.36% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.36% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.36% fail on Power steering
      • 0.36% fail on Operation
  • 0.36% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.36% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.36% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.36% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages