MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Previa » 1998

Toyota Previa MOT Results

Registered in 1998
48.9% pass rate
from 409 tests in 2020
(19% worse than other 1998 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Previa is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (57% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 11% fail on Stop lamp (150% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Position lamps (150% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Position lamp (160% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.49% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.24% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (120% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (120% worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 3.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Switch
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.49% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.5% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.98% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.49% fail on Horn
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 8.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.24% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.98% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt
          • 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.24% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.24% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.98% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.98% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.49% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.49% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.73% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (140% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 5.4% fail on Brake pads (2 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.49% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.24% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.24% fail on Cable
    • 2.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.0% fail on Flexible brake hoses (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.73% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.49% fail on Pedal
      • 0.24% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.73% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.73% fail on Lever
    • 0.73% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.49% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.49% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.24% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.24% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 7.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.73% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.49% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 3.7% fail on Shock absorbers (190% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Suspension arms (60% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.49% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.24% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.2% fail on Springs
      • 1.2% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.2% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.24% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.24% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.24% fail on Macpherson strut
  • 12% fail on Visibility (71% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 10% fail on Wipers (150% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.24% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.24% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.24% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.24% fail on View to rear
      • 0.24% fail on Mirrors
  • 12% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (45% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 11% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 10% fail on Spark ignition
        • 8.6% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.24% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.73% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.49% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.24% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.2% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.4% fail on Chassis
      • 2.4% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.2% fail on Body
      • 0.73% fail on Other body component
      • 0.49% fail on Panel
    • 0.98% fail on Doors
      • 0.49% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.49% fail on Door condition
      • 0.24% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.24% fail on Door condition
      • 0.24% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.24% fail on Door condition
    • 0.73% fail on Transmission (79% better than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.24% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.24% fail on Joints
      • 0.24% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.24% fail on Joints
    • 0.49% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.49% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.49% fail on Seats
      • 0.24% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.24% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.24% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.24% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.24% fail on Carrier
  • 5.9% fail on Tyres
    • 4.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.7% fail on Condition
  • 2.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.49% fail on Condition
    • 0.24% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 2.0% fail on Steering
    • 1.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.98% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.49% fail on Power steering
      • 0.24% fail on Operation
      • 0.24% fail on Other components
    • 0.24% fail on Steering play
      • 0.24% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.7% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.24% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.24% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.24% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.24% fail on Anchorages

Search Good Garages