Toyota Previa MOT Results

Registered in 1997
54.2% pass rate
from 730 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Previa is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (31% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 11% fail on Stop lamp (120% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 8.9% fail on Position lamps (73% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 7.4% fail on Front lamps (100% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.41% fail on All position lamps (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 5.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (170% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 5.9% fail on Fog lamp (190% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Tell tale
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.2% fail on Battery
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators (60% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type (60% better than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.82% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.27% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.14% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.14% fail on Switch
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 7.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 6.8% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.82% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.27% fail on Spring mounting
    • 4.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.27% fail on Linkage condition
    • 4.0% fail on Shock absorbers (100% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Suspension arms (51% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.82% fail on Drive shafts (78% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Front drive shafts (78% better than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.82% fail on Constant velocity joints (77% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.68% fail on Condition
    • 0.68% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.41% fail on Front
      • 0.27% fail on Rear
    • 0.55% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.55% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.14% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.14% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 7.4% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 7.0% fail on Components
        • 3.6% fail on Hoses (87% worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Pipes
        • 1.1% fail on Valves (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.41% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.41% fail on Leaks
      • 0.27% fail on Operation
    • 5.5% fail on Brake performance (38% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.2% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.6% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.55% fail on Service brake performance (69% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 4.2% fail on Hub components (86% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Brake pads (100% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.55% fail on Brake calipers (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Service brake control components (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Pedal (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Anti-slip (10 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.55% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.41% fail on ABS
    • 0.27% fail on Additional braking devices (38 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.14% fail on Pivot
  • 14% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (33% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 8.1% fail on Emissions
    • 7.7% fail on Exhaust system (56% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Emissions not tested (110% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.55% fail on Cap
      • 0.14% fail on System
  • 10% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 8.2% fail on Wipers (60% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.14% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.14% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.2% fail on Tyres
    • 3.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.41% fail on Size/type
    • 0.14% fail on Valve stem
  • 2.9% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (42% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Body condition
    • 0.41% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.41% fail on Chassis
    • 0.27% fail on Doors
      • 0.27% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.14% fail on Seats
      • 0.14% fail on Drivers
    • 0.14% fail on Spare wheel
  • 2.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (54% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Seat belts (44% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas (69% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
      • 0.27% fail on Attachment
  • 0.96% fail on Steering (78% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Steering system (85% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.14% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.14% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.27% fail on Power steering
      • 0.27% fail on Operation
    • 0.14% fail on Steering control
      • 0.14% fail on Steering column
  • 0.82% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.82% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.41% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.41% fail on Attachment
  • 0.14% fail on Towbars
    • 0.14% fail on Vehicle structure

Search Good Garages