Toyota Previa MOT Results
Registered in 199754.2% pass rate
from 730 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Previa is unusually good or bad.
-
28% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(31% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 11% fail on Stop lamp (120% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Position lamps
(73% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 7.4% fail on Front lamps (100% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.41% fail on All position lamps (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 7.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
5.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(170% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Fog lamp (190% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Tell tale
- 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
-
2.7% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.7% fail on Headlamp
- 1.2% fail on Battery
-
1.1% fail on
Direction indicators
(60% better than other 1997 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Flashing type
(60% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.27% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.1% fail on
Flashing type
(60% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.14% fail on Switch
-
17% fail on
Suspension
-
7.8% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 6.8% fail on Component mounting
- 0.82% fail on Subframe mounting
- 0.27% fail on Spring mounting
-
4.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.27% fail on Linkage condition
-
4.0% fail on
Shock absorbers
(100% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(51% better than other 1997 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.82% fail on
Drive shafts
(78% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.82% fail on
Front drive shafts
(78% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Constant velocity joints (77% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.82% fail on
Front drive shafts
(78% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.68% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.68% fail on Condition
-
0.68% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.41% fail on Front
- 0.27% fail on Rear
-
0.55% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.55% fail on Condition
-
0.14% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.14% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.14% fail on Front suspension joints
-
7.8% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
7.4% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
7.0% fail on
Components
- 3.6% fail on Hoses (87% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Pipes
- 1.1% fail on Valves (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.41% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.41% fail on Leaks
- 0.27% fail on Operation
-
7.0% fail on
Components
-
5.5% fail on
Brake performance
(38% better than other 1997 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance
- 2.2% fail on Rear wheels
- 1.6% fail on Front wheels
- 0.55% fail on Service brake performance (69% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Brake imbalance
-
4.2% fail on
Hub components
(86% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Brake pads (100% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Brake discs
- 0.55% fail on Brake calipers (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Service brake control components
(4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Pedal
(4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Anti-slip (10 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Pedal
(4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.1% fail on Condition
- 0.55% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.41% fail on ABS
- 0.27% fail on Additional braking devices (38 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.14% fail on Pivot
-
7.4% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
14% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(33% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 8.1% fail on Emissions
- 7.7% fail on Exhaust system (56% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Emissions not tested (110% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
0.68% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.55% fail on Cap
- 0.14% fail on System
-
10% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 8.2% fail on Wipers (60% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Washers
- 0.14% fail on Windscreen
- 0.14% fail on Mirrors
-
6.2% fail on
Tyres
- 3.4% fail on Tread depth
- 2.6% fail on Condition
- 0.41% fail on Size/type
- 0.14% fail on Valve stem
-
2.9% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(42% better than other 1997 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Body condition
-
0.41% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.41% fail on Chassis
-
0.27% fail on
Doors
- 0.27% fail on Passengers other
-
0.14% fail on
Seats
- 0.14% fail on Drivers
- 0.14% fail on Spare wheel
-
2.6% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(54% better than other 1997 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Seat belts
(44% better than other 1997 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas (69% better than other 1997 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Condition
- 0.27% fail on Attachment
-
2.6% fail on
Seat belts
(44% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.96% fail on
Steering
(78% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.55% fail on
Steering system
(85% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Ball joint
- 0.14% fail on Steering rack
- 0.14% fail on Track rod end
-
0.27% fail on
Power steering
- 0.27% fail on Operation
-
0.14% fail on
Steering control
- 0.14% fail on Steering column
-
0.55% fail on
Steering system
(85% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.82% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.82% fail on Registration plate
-
0.41% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.41% fail on Attachment
-
0.14% fail on
Towbars
- 0.14% fail on Vehicle structure