Toyota Previa MOT Results

Registered in 1996
52.5% pass rate
from 767 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Previa is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (26% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 8.6% fail on Stop lamp (100% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Position lamps (60% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Front lamps (89% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Rear lamps
    • 6.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (100% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Fog lamp (110% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Tell tale
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.13% fail on Matched pair
    • 2.1% fail on Battery
    • 0.91% fail on Direction indicators (66% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Flashing type (66% better than other 1996 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.39% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.52% fail on Electrical wiring (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Horn
    • 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 17% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (57% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 11% fail on Emissions (76% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 8.0% fail on Exhaust system (61% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.26% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.13% fail on Tank
      • 0.13% fail on Cap
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 7.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.9% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.7% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.65% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
    • 7.0% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.9% fail on Components
        • 2.7% fail on Pipes
        • 2.3% fail on Valves (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Hoses
      • 0.13% fail on Leaks
    • 4.2% fail on Hub components (85% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Brake pads (140% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.26% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.91% fail on Service brake control components (180% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Pedal (180% worse than other 1996 cars)
        • 0.78% fail on Anti-slip (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 0.78% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.78% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.13% fail on Cable
    • 0.13% fail on ABS
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 6.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 6.4% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.39% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.26% fail on Spring mounting
    • 4.6% fail on Shock absorbers (130% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage condition
    • 1.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.6% fail on Drive shafts (56% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Front drive shafts (55% better than other 1996 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Constant velocity joints (58% better than other 1996 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Couplings
    • 0.52% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.26% fail on Coil springs (79% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Condition
    • 0.26% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
      • 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.26% fail on Wheel bearings (86% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Front
    • 0.13% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.13% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.13% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road (34% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 8.7% fail on Wipers (73% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.91% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.26% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.8% fail on Tyres
    • 4.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.39% fail on Size/type
  • 4.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.3% fail on Body condition
    • 1.0% fail on Doors
      • 0.52% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.39% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.13% fail on Drivers
    • 0.52% fail on Seats
      • 0.52% fail on Drivers
    • 0.39% fail on Vehicle structure (76% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Chassis (76% better than other 1996 cars)
  • 2.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (63% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Seat belts (57% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas (69% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Condition
  • 2.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.7% fail on Steering (64% better than other 1996 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Steering system (67% better than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.39% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.13% fail on Other components
        • 0.13% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.26% fail on Steering control
      • 0.26% fail on Steering column
    • 0.13% fail on Power steering
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
  • 0.26% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.26% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages