Toyota Previa MOT Results

Registered in 1995
52.5% pass rate
from 366 tests in 2020
(24% worse than other 1995 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Previa is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (45% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 8.7% fail on Stop lamp (160% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Position lamps (170% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Position lamp (180% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 4.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 4.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.55% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.55% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.27% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.55% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.55% fail on Horn
    • 0.82% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.82% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.27% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.27% fail on Switch
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 6.3% fail on Shock absorbers (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.82% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.27% fail on Linkage
    • 1.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.82% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.1% fail on Springs
      • 1.1% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.1% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.82% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.55% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.27% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.27% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.27% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.27% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.27% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 7.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.3% fail on Parking brake performance (200% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Rbt (180% worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 0.27% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.27% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.27% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.55% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.27% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.27% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.27% fail on Service brake performance
    • 3.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.3% fail on Brake linings and pads (160% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Brake pads (160% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.82% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.27% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.27% fail on Cable
    • 1.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.9% fail on Load sensing valves (9 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.82% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.27% fail on Pedal
    • 0.82% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.82% fail on Lever
    • 0.82% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.27% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.27% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 13% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (56% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 11% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 8.7% fail on Spark ignition
        • 6.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.9% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 2.5% fail on Compression ignition (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.55% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.27% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 2.7% fail on Fluid leaks (180% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.55% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.27% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 7.9% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Chassis
      • 2.2% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.1% fail on Transmission
      • 0.82% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.82% fail on Joints
      • 0.27% fail on Belts
    • 1.1% fail on Doors
      • 0.82% fail on Other passenger's door (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.82% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.27% fail on Door condition
    • 0.82% fail on Body
      • 0.55% fail on Other body component
      • 0.27% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.27% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.27% fail on Seats
      • 0.27% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 11% fail on Visibility (52% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Wipers (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.27% fail on Driver's view
  • 6.8% fail on Tyres (77% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Tread depth (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.27% fail on Size/type
  • 1.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.82% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.55% fail on Condition
      • 0.27% fail on Requirements
  • 0.82% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.82% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.27% fail on Steering
    • 0.27% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.27% fail on Track rod end

Search Good Garages