Toyota Previa MOT Results

Registered in 1995
54.1% pass rate
from 512 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Previa is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (39% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 9.8% fail on Position lamps (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 8.2% fail on Front lamps (170% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.20% fail on All position lamps
    • 8.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (94% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 8.4% fail on Stop lamp (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (94% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Fog lamp (96% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.20% fail on Switch
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.59% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.59% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.20% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.2% fail on Battery
    • 0.78% fail on Horn
    • 0.59% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.39% fail on Lamp
      • 0.20% fail on Switch
    • 0.39% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.20% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 9.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.9% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.9% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.9% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.4% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.39% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.20% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.1% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 5.9% fail on Components
        • 2.7% fail on Hoses
        • 2.5% fail on Pipes
        • 1.4% fail on Valves (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Hub components
      • 2.9% fail on Brake pads (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.20% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.2% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Restricted movement (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on ABS
    • 0.39% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.39% fail on Pedal
        • 0.39% fail on Anti-slip
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 6.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (180% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.59% fail on Attachment
    • 5.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 5.1% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.20% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 4.3% fail on Shock absorbers (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.78% fail on Drive shafts (74% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Front drive shafts (74% better than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.78% fail on Constant velocity joints (73% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.59% fail on Condition
    • 0.59% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.39% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.39% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.20% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.20% fail on Front
  • 14% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.8% fail on Exhaust system (61% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Emissions
    • 2.1% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 13% fail on Driver's view of the road (59% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 10.0% fail on Wipers (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.59% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.39% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.20% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.0% fail on Tyres
    • 4.9% fail on Tread depth (72% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on Size/type
  • 3.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.2% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.2% fail on Chassis
    • 1.2% fail on Body condition
    • 0.78% fail on Doors
      • 0.59% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.20% fail on Drivers
      • 0.20% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.20% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.20% fail on Seats
      • 0.20% fail on Passengers
    • 0.20% fail on Spare wheel
  • 2.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (69% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Seat belts (65% better than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
      • 0.39% fail on Prescribed areas (90% better than other 1995 cars)
  • 0.98% fail on Steering (80% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Power steering
      • 0.78% fail on Operation (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Steering system
      • 0.20% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.20% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.20% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages