Toyota Picnic MOT Results

Registered in 2000
53.8% pass rate
from 325 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Picnic is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (69% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 9.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 8.6% fail on Front lamps (78% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on All position lamps (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Rear lamps
    • 7.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.8% fail on Battery
    • 0.62% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.31% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.31% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.31% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.31% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.31% fail on Individual lamps
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.7% fail on Emissions
    • 5.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.92% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.62% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.31% fail on Hose
      • 0.31% fail on Cap
  • 11% fail on Brakes (34% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 5.2% fail on Components
        • 4.6% fail on Pipes
        • 0.62% fail on Hoses
        • 0.31% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.31% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Brake performance (60% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.92% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.92% fail on Rear wheels (78% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.31% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.31% fail on Brake operation
    • 3.1% fail on Hub components
      • 3.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.31% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.92% fail on ABS
  • 10% fail on Suspension (52% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.7% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.7% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 2.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.62% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.2% fail on Component mounting (69% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.31% fail on Spring mounting
    • 0.92% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.92% fail on Condition
    • 0.92% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.92% fail on Condition
  • 10% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.2% fail on Wipers
    • 3.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.92% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.31% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.31% fail on Mirrors
  • 9.8% fail on Tyres
    • 5.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.31% fail on Size/type
    • 0.31% fail on Valve stem
  • 2.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.8% fail on Body condition
    • 0.62% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.62% fail on Chassis
    • 0.31% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.31% fail on Speedometer
  • 2.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.31% fail on Condition
    • 0.31% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.31% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 1.8% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.5% fail on Steering (67% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.92% fail on Steering system (77% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.31% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.62% fail on Power steering
      • 0.31% fail on Operation
      • 0.31% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.31% fail on Pump
  • 0.31% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.31% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages