Toyota Picnic MOT Results
Registered in 200053.8% pass rate
from 325 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Picnic is unusually good or bad.
-
27% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 9.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (69% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
9.5% fail on
Position lamps
- 8.6% fail on Front lamps (78% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.62% fail on All position lamps (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Rear lamps
- 7.7% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.9% fail on Headlamp
- 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.8% fail on Battery
-
0.62% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.31% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.31% fail on Tell tale
-
0.31% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.31% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.31% fail on Individual lamps
-
0.31% fail on
Flashing type
-
12% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 7.7% fail on Emissions
- 5.2% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.92% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.62% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.31% fail on Hose
- 0.31% fail on Cap
-
11% fail on
Brakes
(34% better than other 2000 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
5.2% fail on
Components
- 4.6% fail on Pipes
- 0.62% fail on Hoses
- 0.31% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.31% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
5.2% fail on
Components
-
3.7% fail on
Brake performance
(60% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Front wheels
- 0.92% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.92% fail on Rear wheels (78% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.31% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.31% fail on Brake operation
-
3.1% fail on
Hub components
- 3.1% fail on Brake pads
- 0.31% fail on Brake discs
- 0.92% fail on ABS
-
5.2% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
10% fail on
Suspension
(52% better than other 2000 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Drive shafts
-
3.7% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 3.7% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
3.7% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
2.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
2.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.62% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
2.2% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 1.2% fail on Component mounting (69% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Subframe mounting
- 0.31% fail on Spring mounting
-
0.92% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.92% fail on Condition
-
0.92% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.92% fail on Condition
-
3.7% fail on
Drive shafts
-
10% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 6.2% fail on Wipers
- 3.1% fail on Washers
- 0.92% fail on Windscreen
- 0.31% fail on Bonnet
- 0.31% fail on Mirrors
-
9.8% fail on
Tyres
- 5.5% fail on Tread depth
- 4.6% fail on Condition
- 0.31% fail on Size/type
- 0.31% fail on Valve stem
-
2.8% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 1.8% fail on Body condition
-
0.62% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.62% fail on Chassis
- 0.31% fail on Engine mountings
- 0.31% fail on Speedometer
-
2.2% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
1.8% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.31% fail on Condition
-
0.31% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.31% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
1.8% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.8% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.8% fail on Registration plate
-
1.5% fail on
Steering
(67% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.92% fail on
Steering system
(77% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Track rod end
- 0.31% fail on Ball joint
- 0.31% fail on Steering arm
-
0.62% fail on
Power steering
- 0.31% fail on Operation
- 0.31% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.31% fail on Pump
-
0.92% fail on
Steering system
(77% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.31% fail on Attachment