MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Picnic » 2000

Toyota Picnic MOT Results

Registered in 2000
52.2% pass rate
from 134 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Picnic is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.75% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.75% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.75% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.75% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.75% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.75% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.75% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.75% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.5% fail on Transmission
      • 3.7% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.7% fail on Joints
      • 0.75% fail on Belts
    • 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.5% fail on Chassis
      • 1.5% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.75% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.75% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.75% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.75% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.75% fail on Seats
      • 0.75% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.75% fail on Cabs
      • 0.75% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 14% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 13% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 13% fail on Spark ignition
        • 9.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.5% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.5% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 10% fail on Visibility
    • 8.2% fail on Wipers
    • 1.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.75% fail on Bonnet
  • 9.7% fail on Brakes
    • 5.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.5% fail on Rbt
          • 4.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.75% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.75% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.75% fail on Rbt
          • 0.75% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.75% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.75% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 2.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.75% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.75% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.75% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 7.5% fail on Suspension
    • 4.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.75% fail on Ball joint
    • 3.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.75% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.75% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.75% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 6.0% fail on Tyres
    • 4.5% fail on Condition
    • 3.7% fail on Tread depth
  • 4.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.75% fail on Condition
    • 0.75% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.5% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.75% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.75% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages