MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Picnic » 1999

Toyota Picnic MOT Results

Registered in 1999
51.4% pass rate
from 459 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Picnic is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Registration plate lamp (91% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 10% fail on Position lamps (62% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 9.4% fail on Front lamps (99% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Rear lamps
    • 8.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.44% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.44% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.44% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.22% fail on Switch
    • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.1% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.44% fail on Battery
    • 0.44% fail on Horn
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 9.2% fail on Drive shafts (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 9.2% fail on Front drive shafts (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 8.9% fail on Constant velocity joints (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Couplings
    • 5.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 4.8% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.87% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 3.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.65% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.65% fail on Coil springs (77% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Condition (76% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Suspension arms (84% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (83% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.44% fail on Front
    • 0.22% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.22% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 15% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 8.9% fail on Emissions
    • 7.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.22% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.22% fail on Pipe
  • 12% fail on Brakes (30% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.3% fail on Components
        • 4.1% fail on Pipes
        • 1.7% fail on Hoses
        • 0.44% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.22% fail on Operation
      • 0.22% fail on Leaks
    • 6.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.4% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.2% fail on Brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Rear wheels (74% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.65% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Brake operation
    • 2.0% fail on Hub components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.22% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.87% fail on ABS
    • 0.44% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.44% fail on Pedal
        • 0.44% fail on Anti-slip
  • 10% fail on Tyres
    • 6.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 5.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Size/type
    • 0.22% fail on Valve stem
  • 10% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.6% fail on Wipers
    • 2.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.65% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.22% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.9% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.7% fail on Body condition
    • 1.1% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.1% fail on Chassis
    • 0.65% fail on Spare wheel (21 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.22% fail on Doors
      • 0.22% fail on Drivers
  • 2.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (52% better than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.65% fail on Condition
    • 0.44% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.22% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.22% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 2.2% fail on Steering
    • 1.1% fail on Power steering
      • 0.44% fail on Operation
      • 0.22% fail on Drive system
      • 0.22% fail on Pump
      • 0.22% fail on Other components
    • 0.87% fail on Steering system (77% better than other 1999 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.22% fail on Steering control
      • 0.22% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.22% fail on Universal joint
  • 2.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.44% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.22% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages