Toyota Picnic MOT Results
Registered in 199951.4% pass rate
from 459 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Picnic is unusually good or bad.
-
28% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 11% fail on Registration plate lamp (91% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
10% fail on
Position lamps
(62% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 9.4% fail on Front lamps (99% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Rear lamps
- 8.3% fail on Stop lamp
- 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
-
4.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.6% fail on Headlamp
-
1.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.44% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.44% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.44% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.22% fail on Switch
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.1% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.44% fail on Battery
- 0.44% fail on Horn
-
17% fail on
Suspension
-
9.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(130% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
(140% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 8.9% fail on Constant velocity joints (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Couplings
-
9.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
(140% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 4.8% fail on Component mounting
- 0.87% fail on Subframe mounting
-
3.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 3.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.65% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.7% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.7% fail on Condition
-
0.65% fail on
Coil springs
(77% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Condition (76% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Suspension arms
(84% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (83% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.44% fail on Front
-
0.22% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.22% fail on Condition
- 0.22% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
9.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(130% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
15% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 8.9% fail on Emissions
- 7.8% fail on Exhaust system
- 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.22% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.22% fail on Pipe
-
12% fail on
Brakes
(30% better than other 1999 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
6.3% fail on
Components
- 4.1% fail on Pipes
- 1.7% fail on Hoses
- 0.44% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.22% fail on Operation
- 0.22% fail on Leaks
-
6.3% fail on
Components
-
6.8% fail on
Brake performance
- 4.4% fail on Front wheels
- 2.2% fail on Brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Rear wheels (74% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.65% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Brake operation
-
2.0% fail on
Hub components
- 2.0% fail on Brake pads
- 0.22% fail on Wheel cylinder
- 0.87% fail on ABS
-
0.44% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.44% fail on
Pedal
- 0.44% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.44% fail on
Pedal
-
6.8% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
10% fail on
Tyres
- 6.3% fail on Tread depth
- 5.0% fail on Condition
- 0.22% fail on Size/type
- 0.22% fail on Valve stem
-
10% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 7.6% fail on Wipers
- 2.2% fail on Washers
- 0.65% fail on Windscreen
- 0.22% fail on Mirrors
-
3.9% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 1.7% fail on Body condition
-
1.1% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.1% fail on Chassis
- 0.65% fail on Spare wheel (21 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Engine mountings
-
0.22% fail on
Doors
- 0.22% fail on Drivers
-
2.6% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(52% better than other 1999 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.65% fail on Condition
-
0.44% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.22% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.22% fail on Drivers airbag
-
2.2% fail on
Seat belts
-
2.2% fail on
Steering
-
1.1% fail on
Power steering
- 0.44% fail on Operation
- 0.22% fail on Drive system
- 0.22% fail on Pump
- 0.22% fail on Other components
-
0.87% fail on
Steering system
(77% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Steering rack
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint
-
0.22% fail on
Steering control
-
0.22% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.22% fail on Universal joint
-
0.22% fail on
Steering coupling
-
1.1% fail on
Power steering
-
2.0% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 2.0% fail on Registration plate
-
0.44% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.22% fail on Condition
- 0.22% fail on Attachment