MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » Picnic » 1998

Toyota Picnic MOT Results

Registered in 1998
57.9% pass rate
from 152 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Picnic is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (150% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.66% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.3% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.3% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.66% fail on Springs
      • 0.66% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.66% fail on Coil spring
  • 16% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (100% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 14% fail on Exhaust emissions (93% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 14% fail on Spark ignition (110% worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 13% fail on Catalyst emissions (130% worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.3% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.3% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.3% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.66% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.66% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.66% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.66% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.66% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 7.9% fail on Transmission (170% worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 7.9% fail on Drive shafts (190% worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 7.9% fail on Joints (190% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.3% fail on Seats
      • 1.3% fail on Passenger's seat (9 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.66% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.66% fail on Body
      • 0.66% fail on Body condition
    • 0.66% fail on Cabs
      • 0.66% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 11% fail on Brakes
    • 3.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.66% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.66% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 3.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.0% fail on Hydraulic systems (9 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake fluid (11 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Master cylinder
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
    • 2.0% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 2.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 1.3% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 9.2% fail on Tyres (150% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Condition (200% worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Tread depth
  • 7.2% fail on Visibility
    • 7.2% fail on Wipers
    • 0.66% fail on View to rear
      • 0.66% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.0% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.66% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.66% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages