Toyota Picnic MOT Results
Registered in 199758.3% pass rate
from 120 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Picnic is unusually good or bad.
-
18% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(120% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
18% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(140% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
18% fail on
Spark ignition
(150% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 14% fail on Catalyst emissions (160% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.83% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 0.83% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
18% fail on
Spark ignition
(150% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
18% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(140% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
17% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 9.2% fail on Exhaust system (200% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Transmission
-
5.8% fail on
Drive shafts
- 5.8% fail on Joints
-
5.8% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.83% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.83% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.83% fail on
Chassis
- 0.83% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.83% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.83% fail on Pipe
- 0.83% fail on Bumpers
-
0.83% fail on
Cabs
- 0.83% fail on Prescribed areas
-
14% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 5.0% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.2% fail on Headlamp
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.83% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.7% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.83% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.83% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.83% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.83% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.83% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.83% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.83% fail on Horn
-
11% fail on
Suspension
- 8.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
2.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.83% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.83% fail on
Axles
- 0.83% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
0.83% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.83% fail on Linkage ball joints
-
5.8% fail on
Brakes
-
5.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.2% fail on
Rbt
- 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
4.2% fail on
Rbt
-
1.7% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.83% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.83% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
4.2% fail on
Service brake performance
- 0.83% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
5.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.8% fail on
Visibility
- 4.2% fail on Wipers
- 1.7% fail on Washers
-
5.8% fail on
Tyres
- 3.3% fail on Condition
- 2.5% fail on Tread depth
-
3.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
3.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.3% fail on Prescribed areas
-
3.3% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.7% fail on
Steering
-
0.83% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.83% fail on Locking devices
- 0.83% fail on Steering column
-
0.83% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.83% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.83% fail on Registration plates
-
0.83% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.83% fail on Attachment