Toyota MR2 MOT Results
Registered in 200566.7% pass rate
from 974 tests in 2021
(28% better than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota MR2 is unusually good or bad.
-
17% fail on
Brakes
(27% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
(110% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
13% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 13% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Parking brake performance
(180% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Rbt
(180% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Parking brake performance (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.21% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.10% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.10% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
4.3% fail on
Rbt
(180% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.3% fail on
Rbt
- 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.41% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.21% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.10% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.10% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
3.3% fail on
Rbt
-
1.0% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.92% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.62% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.31% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.10% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.10% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.92% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.21% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
13% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
2.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.0% fail on Brake pads
-
0.72% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Cable
- 0.21% fail on Pivot (44 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Clevis joint
-
0.51% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.51% fail on Brake discs
-
1.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake control
(130% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Lever (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Rigid brake pipes (72% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.72% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.72% fail on Hand lever
- 0.51% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.10% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.10% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.10% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.10% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
(110% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
8.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
8.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
8.2% fail on
Spark ignition
(62% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (53% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Catalyst emissions (71% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.31% fail on
Emission control equipment
(6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Catalytic converter (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Oxygen sensor
-
0.21% fail on
Compression ignition
(85% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.10% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.10% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
0.10% fail on
Emission control equipment
-
8.2% fail on
Spark ignition
(62% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.21% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
8.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.7% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(52% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamps
(53% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Headlamp (50% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.10% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 1.5% fail on Stop lamp (63% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.82% fail on
Direction indicators
(69% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.82% fail on
Flashing type
(69% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Individual direction indicators (77% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.82% fail on
Flashing type
(69% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (68% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.72% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.41% fail on Horn
- 0.21% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.10% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.10% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.10% fail on Position lamp
-
0.10% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.10% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.10% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamps
(53% better than other 2005 cars)
-
6.6% fail on
Suspension
(62% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Springs
(65% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Coil springs
(65% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Coil spring (64% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Coil springs
(65% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
-
1.1% fail on
Sub-frames
(130% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Sub-frame (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 1.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
0.92% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(83% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (82% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.21% fail on Linkage ball joints (87% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.10% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.10% fail on Linkage
- 0.72% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.51% fail on
Suspension arms
(91% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Ball joint (83% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.21% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.21% fail on Other suspension component (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.10% fail on Macpherson strut
-
1.6% fail on
Springs
(65% better than other 2005 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
Tyres
(38% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Condition
- 1.8% fail on Tread depth (50% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Size/type
-
3.9% fail on
Visibility
(48% better than other 2005 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Wipers
- 0.72% fail on Washers (80% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(82% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.51% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.41% fail on Exhaust system (86% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Seats
- 0.21% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.10% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.21% fail on
Chassis
- 0.21% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.21% fail on
Transmission
(94% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Drive shafts
(94% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Joints (94% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Drive shafts
(94% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
1.0% fail on
Steering
(74% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.62% fail on
Power steering
- 0.51% fail on Pipes and hoses (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Operation
-
0.21% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.21% fail on Steering rack
- 0.10% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.10% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.10% fail on Locking devices
-
0.62% fail on
Power steering
-
0.21% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.21% fail on Registration plates
-
0.21% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(93% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Seat belts
(85% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.10% fail on Condition
-
0.21% fail on
Seat belts
(85% better than other 2005 cars)