Toyota MR2 MOT Results

Registered in 2003
58.2% pass rate
from 1,454 tests in 2017
(14% better than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota MR2 is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Brakes (47% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 20% fail on Brake performance (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 16% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 11% fail on Rear wheels (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Front wheels (47% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.21% fail on Service brake performance
    • 3.2% fail on Parking brake (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Hub components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake pads (45% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.62% fail on Brake calipers (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Hydraulic systems (67% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Components (70% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Pipes (73% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.55% fail on Hoses (58% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.069% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.28% fail on Leaks
    • 0.69% fail on Restricted movement (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.28% fail on Cable
      • 0.069% fail on Clevis joint
    • 0.14% fail on Electronic stability system
  • 16% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (41% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamp aim (39% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Position lamps (40% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Front lamps (31% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Rear lamps (75% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Registration plate lamp (44% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Stop lamp (39% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamps (46% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp (44% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Battery
    • 0.48% fail on Rear fog lamp (69% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Fog lamp (72% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.069% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.28% fail on Horn
    • 0.14% fail on Direction indicators (95% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Flashing type (95% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Side repeaters (83% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.069% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.069% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 9.8% fail on Suspension (52% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Coil springs
      • 5.5% fail on Condition
      • 0.069% fail on Location
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.89% fail on Front
      • 0.55% fail on Rear
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.83% fail on Prescribed areas (60% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Component mounting (62% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.069% fail on Spring mounting
    • 0.69% fail on Anti-roll bars (88% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (85% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.069% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.62% fail on Suspension arms (87% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (87% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.069% fail on Attachment
    • 0.41% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.41% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.069% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.069% fail on Condition
    • 0.069% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 6.5% fail on Driver's view of the road (28% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 0.76% fail on Washers (79% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.14% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.9% fail on Tyres (35% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Tread depth (42% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.069% fail on Size/type
    • 0.069% fail on Valve stem
  • 4.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (45% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Emissions
    • 0.62% fail on Exhaust system (86% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Emissions not tested (82% better than other 2003 cars)
  • 1.2% fail on Steering (77% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Power steering
      • 0.55% fail on Pipes and hoses (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.069% fail on Other components
    • 0.34% fail on Steering operation (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Steering control
      • 0.21% fail on Steering coupling (10 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Universal joint (10 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.069% fail on Steering system
      • 0.069% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.62% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.62% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.48% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.41% fail on Attachment
    • 0.069% fail on Condition
  • 0.28% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (88% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.069% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.069% fail on Chassis
    • 0.069% fail on Body condition
    • 0.069% fail on Doors
      • 0.069% fail on Drivers
    • 0.069% fail on Seats
      • 0.069% fail on Passengers
  • 0.14% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (96% better than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Seat belts (93% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.069% fail on Condition
      • 0.069% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages