Toyota MR2 MOT Results
Registered in 200358.2% pass rate
from 1,454 tests in 2017
(14% better than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota MR2 is unusually good or bad.
-
24% fail on
Brakes
(47% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
20% fail on
Brake performance
(140% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 16% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 11% fail on Rear wheels (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Front wheels (47% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.21% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.2% fail on
Parking brake
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Hub components
- 1.3% fail on Brake pads (45% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.76% fail on Brake discs
- 0.62% fail on Brake calipers (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(67% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Components
(70% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Pipes (73% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Hoses (58% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.069% fail on Cylinders
- 0.28% fail on Leaks
-
1.8% fail on
Components
(70% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Restricted movement (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.28% fail on Cable
- 0.069% fail on Clevis joint
- 0.14% fail on Electronic stability system
-
20% fail on
Brake performance
(140% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
16% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(41% better than other 2003 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Headlamp aim (39% better than other 2003 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Position lamps
(40% better than other 2003 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Front lamps (31% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Rear lamps (75% better than other 2003 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Registration plate lamp (44% better than other 2003 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Stop lamp (39% better than other 2003 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Headlamps
(46% better than other 2003 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp (44% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Battery
-
0.48% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(69% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Fog lamp (72% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.069% fail on Tell tale
- 0.28% fail on Horn
-
0.14% fail on
Direction indicators
(95% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Flashing type
(95% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Side repeaters (83% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Flashing type
(95% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.069% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.069% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
9.8% fail on
Suspension
(52% better than other 2003 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Coil springs
- 5.5% fail on Condition
- 0.069% fail on Location
-
1.4% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.89% fail on Front
- 0.55% fail on Rear
-
1.2% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.2% fail on Condition
-
0.83% fail on
Prescribed areas
(60% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Component mounting (62% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Subframe mounting
- 0.069% fail on Spring mounting
-
0.69% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(88% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (85% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.069% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.62% fail on
Suspension arms
(87% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (87% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.069% fail on Attachment
-
0.41% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.41% fail on Condition
-
0.21% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.069% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.069% fail on Condition
- 0.069% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
5.6% fail on
Coil springs
-
6.5% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(28% better than other 2003 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Wipers
- 0.76% fail on Washers (79% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Windscreen
- 0.14% fail on Bonnet
-
5.9% fail on
Tyres
(35% better than other 2003 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Tread depth (42% better than other 2003 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Condition
- 0.069% fail on Size/type
- 0.069% fail on Valve stem
-
4.1% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(45% better than other 2003 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Emissions
- 0.62% fail on Exhaust system (86% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Emissions not tested (82% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Steering
(77% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.62% fail on
Power steering
- 0.55% fail on Pipes and hoses (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.069% fail on Other components
- 0.34% fail on Steering operation (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Steering control
-
0.21% fail on
Steering coupling
(10 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Universal joint (10 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Steering coupling
(10 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.069% fail on
Steering system
- 0.069% fail on Steering rack
-
0.62% fail on
Power steering
-
0.62% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.62% fail on Registration plate
-
0.48% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.41% fail on Attachment
- 0.069% fail on Condition
-
0.28% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(88% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.069% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.069% fail on Chassis
- 0.069% fail on Body condition
-
0.069% fail on
Doors
- 0.069% fail on Drivers
-
0.069% fail on
Seats
- 0.069% fail on Passengers
-
0.069% fail on
Vehicle structure
-
0.14% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(96% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Seat belts
(93% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.069% fail on Condition
- 0.069% fail on Attachment
-
0.14% fail on
Seat belts
(93% better than other 2003 cars)