Toyota MR2 MOT Results

Registered in 1997
63.0% pass rate
from 284 tests in 2017
(19% better than other 1997 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota MR2 is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (64% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 9.2% fail on Parking brake performance (130% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 8.5% fail on Rear wheels (130% worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.1% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 2.5% fail on Hub components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.35% fail on Brake back plates
    • 1.8% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.70% fail on Hydraulic systems (88% better than other 1997 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Components (87% better than other 1997 cars)
        • 0.70% fail on Hoses
    • 0.35% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.35% fail on Lever
    • 0.35% fail on Restricted movement
  • 14% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 12% fail on Emissions (98% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 12% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (44% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.35% fail on Rear lamps
    • 2.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.1% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.35% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.1% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.35% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.4% fail on Horn
  • 11% fail on Suspension (42% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 4.9% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.35% fail on Spring mounting
    • 2.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.8% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.70% fail on Condition
      • 0.35% fail on Location
    • 0.70% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.70% fail on Condition
    • 0.35% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.35% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.35% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.35% fail on Condition
    • 0.35% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.35% fail on Condition
    • 0.35% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.35% fail on Rear
    • 0.35% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.35% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.35% fail on Drive shafts
  • 7.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 7.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 7.0% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 5.3% fail on Tyres
    • 3.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.35% fail on Valve stem
  • 4.2% fail on Driver's view of the road (51% better than other 1997 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Wipers
    • 1.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.70% fail on Windscreen
  • 3.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.4% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.4% fail on Chassis
    • 1.1% fail on Body condition
    • 0.35% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.35% fail on Seats
      • 0.35% fail on Drivers
  • 1.8% fail on Steering
    • 1.8% fail on Steering system
      • 1.8% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.70% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.70% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.35% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.35% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages