Toyota MR2 MOT Results
Registered in 199564.9% pass rate
from 205 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota MR2 is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Brakes
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
(72% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
7.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(170% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 7.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (190% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt
- 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.49% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt
-
2.4% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt
- 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt
- 1.5% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.49% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.49% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.49% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.49% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
7.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(170% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 1.5% fail on Hand lever (9 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
1.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.5% fail on Brake pads
-
1.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.98% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.98% fail on Lever
-
0.98% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.98% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.49% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.49% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.49% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
(72% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
13% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
3.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp
- 0.98% fail on Headlamp levelling device (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 3.4% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.98% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.98% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.49% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.49% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.98% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.49% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.49% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.49% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.49% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.49% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.49% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
0.49% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.49% fail on Horn
-
3.9% fail on
Headlamps
-
13% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(69% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
13% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(84% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
12% fail on
Spark ignition
(96% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 9.3% fail on Catalyst emissions (90% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.49% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.49% fail on Catalytic converter
-
0.98% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.49% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.49% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.49% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
0.49% fail on
Emission control equipment
-
12% fail on
Spark ignition
(96% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.49% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
13% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(84% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
12% fail on
Suspension
- 6.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
2.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.5% fail on Linkage (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.49% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.49% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
0.98% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.49% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.49% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.49% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.49% fail on
Springs
-
0.49% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.49% fail on Coil spring
-
0.49% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.49% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.49% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.49% fail on Suspension rod
-
0.49% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.49% fail on Sub-frame
-
5.4% fail on
Steering
-
4.9% fail on
Steering gear
(3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Power steering
- 0.49% fail on Operation
-
4.9% fail on
Steering gear
(3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
4.9% fail on
Seat belts
- 4.9% fail on Prescribed areas
-
4.9% fail on
Seat belts
-
4.4% fail on
Visibility
- 2.4% fail on Wipers
- 2.0% fail on Washers
- 0.49% fail on Bonnet
-
3.9% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(60% better than other 1995 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.5% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.49% fail on
Chassis
- 0.49% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.49% fail on
Body
- 0.49% fail on Panel
-
2.4% fail on
Tyres
- 2.0% fail on Tread depth
- 0.49% fail on Condition
-
0.49% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.49% fail on Attachment