Toyota MR2 MOT Results

Registered in 1995
57.0% pass rate
from 374 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota MR2 is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Brakes (61% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 16% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 9.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 9.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.53% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 6.7% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 6.7% fail on Rbt (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 6.1% fail on Service brake performance (180% worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 0.80% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 5.9% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 5.3% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 4.8% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
          • 0.53% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.27% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.27% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.27% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.27% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.53% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.53% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.27% fail on Cable
        • 0.27% fail on Linkage
      • 0.27% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.27% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.4% fail on Parking brake control (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (200% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Hand lever (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Pedal
    • 0.80% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.80% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.80% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.53% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.27% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.27% fail on Valves
    • 0.53% fail on Rigid brake pipes (81% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.53% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.27% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.27% fail on Leaks
    • 0.27% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.27% fail on Other components
  • 18% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 17% fail on Exhaust emissions (130% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 17% fail on Spark ignition (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 14% fail on Catalyst emissions (150% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 3.5% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.80% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.80% fail on Catalytic converter (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.53% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.27% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.27% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.27% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.27% fail on Sound deadening material
    • 0.27% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.27% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 15% fail on Suspension
    • 7.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.80% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.80% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.27% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.27% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.27% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.9% fail on Sub-frames (200% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Sub-frame (8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.3% fail on Macpherson strut (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.27% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.53% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.27% fail on Suspension arm
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.27% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.27% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.27% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.27% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.7% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.7% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.1% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.27% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.80% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.53% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.27% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 6.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure (42% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.1% fail on Chassis
      • 1.1% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.80% fail on Seats
      • 0.80% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.53% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.27% fail on Pipe
      • 0.27% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.27% fail on Transmission
      • 0.27% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.27% fail on Joints
    • 0.27% fail on Body
      • 0.27% fail on Panel
    • 0.27% fail on Undertray
  • 5.3% fail on Steering
    • 4.3% fail on Steering gear (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Steering play (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Steering rack (14 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.27% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.27% fail on Steering wheel
  • 4.8% fail on Visibility
    • 2.9% fail on Wipers
    • 1.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.27% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.27% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.27% fail on View to rear
      • 0.27% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.8% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 4.0% fail on Tyres
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.6% fail on Condition
  • 1.6% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.53% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.27% fail on Attachment
    • 0.27% fail on Hubs

Search Good Garages