Toyota MR2 MOT Results

Registered in 1994
57.2% pass rate
from 505 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota MR2 is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (120% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 17% fail on Exhaust emissions (140% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 17% fail on Spark ignition (170% worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 12% fail on Catalyst emissions (160% worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 3.8% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Emission control equipment (6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
          • 1.6% fail on Catalytic converter (7 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 0.59% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.20% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.20% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.20% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.20% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.2% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.20% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 17% fail on Brakes (43% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 13% fail on Brake performance (92% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 10% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 9.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.20% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.6% fail on Rbt
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.40% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.20% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.8% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
          • 2.8% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
          • 0.40% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.20% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.59% fail on Plate brake tester (16 times worse than other 1994 cars)
          • 0.40% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (19 times worse than other 1994 cars)
          • 0.20% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.20% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.40% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.40% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.4% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Hand lever (7 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 0.99% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.99% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.79% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.59% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.59% fail on Lever
    • 0.20% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.20% fail on Valves
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 3.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 3.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.6% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.59% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 2.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.0% fail on Horn
      • 0.20% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Stop lamp (64% better than other 1994 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.20% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.20% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 12% fail on Suspension
    • 7.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joints (190% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Ball joint dust cover (8 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.99% fail on Macpherson strut (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Macpherson strut (6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.59% fail on Springs
      • 0.59% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.59% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.40% fail on Suspension arms (87% better than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.20% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.20% fail on Suspension rod
    • 0.20% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint
  • 7.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.4% fail on Chassis
      • 1.4% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.59% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.59% fail on Pipe
    • 0.40% fail on Seats
      • 0.40% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.20% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.40% fail on Boot lid (7 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Other boot lid component (69 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Transmission
      • 0.20% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.20% fail on Joints
    • 0.20% fail on Floor
  • 5.3% fail on Visibility
    • 4.0% fail on Wipers
    • 1.2% fail on Washers (66% better than other 1994 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.40% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.20% fail on Driver's view
  • 4.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.4% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 3.8% fail on Tyres
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.6% fail on Condition
  • 3.6% fail on Steering
    • 3.2% fail on Steering gear (160% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Steering rack (190% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.20% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.20% fail on Power steering
      • 0.20% fail on Operation
  • 1.2% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.20% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.20% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages