MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » MR2 » 1994

Toyota MR2 MOT Results

Registered in 1994
65.1% pass rate
from 229 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota MR2 is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (140% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 17% fail on Exhaust emissions (160% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 17% fail on Spark ignition (190% worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 15% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.87% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.87% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.87% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.44% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.44% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    • 0.44% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.44% fail on Other leaks
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 9.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (110% worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 5.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (130% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt
          • 3.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.1% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
          • 3.1% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.87% fail on Service brake performance
    • 2.2% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Hand lever (12 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Pedal
    • 1.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.87% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.87% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake control (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 0.87% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.44% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.44% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.44% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.44% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.44% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 12% fail on Suspension
    • 6.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joints (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Linkage
      • 0.44% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 1.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.87% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.44% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.87% fail on Springs
      • 0.87% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.44% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.44% fail on Mounting
    • 0.87% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.44% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.44% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.44% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.44% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.44% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.44% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 8.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.44% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.87% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.87% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.87% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.87% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.87% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.44% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.44% fail on Horn
    • 0.44% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.44% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.44% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.44% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.44% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 7.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.87% fail on Chassis
      • 0.87% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.87% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.87% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.44% fail on Transmission
      • 0.44% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.44% fail on Drive shaft
    • 0.44% fail on Body
      • 0.44% fail on Panel
    • 0.44% fail on Doors
      • 0.44% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.44% fail on Door condition
    • 0.44% fail on Seats
      • 0.44% fail on Driver's seat
  • 5.2% fail on Steering
    • 4.8% fail on Steering gear (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Steering play
      • 0.44% fail on Steering rack
  • 4.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.4% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 4.4% fail on Tyres
    • 3.5% fail on Tread depth (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 0.87% fail on Condition
  • 3.1% fail on Visibility
    • 2.6% fail on Wipers
    • 0.44% fail on Bonnet
  • 1.3% fail on Road Wheels (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Attachment (4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
  • 0.87% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.87% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.44% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.44% fail on Speedometer

Search Good Garages