Toyota MR2 MOT Results

Registered in 1994
59.5% pass rate
from 496 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota MR2 is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Brakes (34% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 13% fail on Brake performance (53% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 8.7% fail on Parking brake performance (170% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Rear wheels (75% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.60% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.20% fail on Brake operation
    • 4.0% fail on Parking brake (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 2.8% fail on Components
        • 2.4% fail on Hoses
        • 0.20% fail on Pipes
        • 0.20% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.40% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.20% fail on Operation
    • 2.0% fail on Hub components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.60% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.20% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.2% fail on Restricted movement (4 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on ABS
    • 0.60% fail on Locking devices (62 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.20% fail on Cable
      • 0.20% fail on Clevis joint
  • 18% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.6% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.40% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 4.0% fail on Fog lamp
      • 1.6% fail on Tell tale (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Switch
    • 3.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.8% fail on Individual lamps
        • 1.4% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.8% fail on Horn (130% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Stop lamp (63% better than other 1994 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.81% fail on Battery
    • 0.40% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.20% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.20% fail on Lamp
  • 17% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (60% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 13% fail on Emissions (140% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 5.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 4.8% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.60% fail on Spring mounting
      • 0.40% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 4.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.60% fail on Linkage condition
    • 3.0% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 3.0% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.81% fail on Rear
      • 0.60% fail on Front
    • 1.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.81% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.60% fail on Condition
      • 0.40% fail on Location
    • 0.60% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.60% fail on Condition
    • 0.60% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.20% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.20% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.20% fail on Condition
  • 7.5% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.8% fail on Wipers
    • 3.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.20% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.20% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.2% fail on Tyres
    • 3.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on Size/type
  • 5.0% fail on Steering
    • 3.8% fail on Steering system
      • 2.6% fail on Steering rack (110% worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.40% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.20% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.60% fail on Power steering
      • 0.40% fail on Other components
      • 0.20% fail on Operation
    • 0.40% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.40% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.20% fail on Steering control
      • 0.20% fail on Steering wheel
  • 5.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 5.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment
  • 3.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.6% fail on Body condition
    • 0.60% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.60% fail on Chassis
    • 0.20% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.20% fail on Doors
      • 0.20% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.20% fail on Seats
      • 0.20% fail on Drivers
  • 1.8% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.60% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.60% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages