MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Toyota » MR2 » 1993

Toyota MR2 MOT Results

Registered in 1993
60.2% pass rate
from 329 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1993 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota MR2 is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (170% worse than other 1993 cars)
    • 20% fail on Exhaust emissions (180% worse than other 1993 cars)
      • 20% fail on Spark ignition (200% worse than other 1993 cars)
        • 17% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 1993 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.91% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.30% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.30% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 2.4% fail on Fluid leaks (2 times worse than other 1993 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Engine oil leaks (3 times worse than other 1993 cars)
  • 16% fail on Brakes (49% worse than other 1993 cars)
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (90% worse than other 1993 cars)
      • 9.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (190% worse than other 1993 cars)
        • 8.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 1993 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 6.1% fail on Service brake performance (100% worse than other 1993 cars)
        • 6.1% fail on Rbt (110% worse than other 1993 cars)
          • 5.5% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 1993 cars)
          • 0.91% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.6% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 1993 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 1993 cars)
          • 3.3% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 1993 cars)
          • 0.30% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 1.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.30% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 1.2% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.2% fail on Lever
    • 0.91% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (3 times worse than other 1993 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (7 times worse than other 1993 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.30% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.30% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.30% fail on Brake discs
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.30% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.61% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.61% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.30% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.61% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.30% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.30% fail on Horn
    • 0.91% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 12% fail on Suspension
    • 7.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (170% worse than other 1993 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joints (6 times worse than other 1993 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 1993 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.30% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.91% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.91% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.91% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.91% fail on Macpherson strut (8 times worse than other 1993 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (11 times worse than other 1993 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.30% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.30% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.30% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint
  • 6.7% fail on Visibility
    • 4.9% fail on Wipers
    • 2.7% fail on Washers
  • 5.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (42% better than other 1993 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.91% fail on Chassis
      • 0.61% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.30% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.30% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.30% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
  • 4.9% fail on Tyres (100% worse than other 1993 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Tread depth (180% worse than other 1993 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Condition
  • 4.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.61% fail on Condition
      • 0.30% fail on Load limiters
      • 0.30% fail on Pre-tensioners
  • 3.6% fail on Steering
    • 2.1% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.8% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.30% fail on Operation
    • 0.61% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.61% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.61% fail on Power steering
      • 0.61% fail on Operation
    • 0.30% fail on Steering wheel
  • 0.61% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.61% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.30% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.30% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages