Toyota MR2 MOT Results

Registered in 1992
57.3% pass rate
from 744 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota MR2 is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.2% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.67% fail on Rear lamps
    • 3.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 3.4% fail on Fog lamp
      • 1.1% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.67% fail on Switch
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.6% fail on Side repeaters
        • 1.1% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.9% fail on Horn
    • 0.81% fail on Battery
    • 0.40% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.13% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.13% fail on Lamp
  • 19% fail on Brakes (29% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (56% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 8.9% fail on Parking brake performance (140% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Rear wheels (76% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.5% fail on Brake imbalance (140% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.13% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.5% fail on Parking brake (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Hub components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.54% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.27% fail on Brake calipers
    • 2.0% fail on Hydraulic systems (60% better than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Components (61% better than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.94% fail on Hoses
        • 0.67% fail on Pipes (77% better than other 1992 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
      • 0.13% fail on Leaks
    • 0.67% fail on Mechanical components (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Cable
      • 0.27% fail on Lever (34 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.27% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.27% fail on Pedal
        • 0.27% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.27% fail on ABS
    • 0.13% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.13% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 7.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 6.9% fail on Component mounting (51% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.54% fail on Spring mounting
    • 3.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (72% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.40% fail on Attachment
    • 2.3% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.2% fail on Rear
      • 1.1% fail on Front
    • 2.3% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Macpherson strut (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.27% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.27% fail on Location
    • 0.27% fail on Drive shafts (90% better than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.27% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.13% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.13% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 9.5% fail on Emissions (110% worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.67% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 7.8% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.8% fail on Wipers
    • 2.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.40% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.13% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.13% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.6% fail on Tyres
    • 3.1% fail on Condition
    • 3.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.27% fail on Size/type
    • 0.27% fail on Valve stem
  • 5.5% fail on Steering
    • 4.7% fail on Steering system
      • 3.8% fail on Steering rack (140% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.40% fail on Track rod end (75% better than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Free play
        • 0.13% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.13% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.40% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.27% fail on Power steering
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
      • 0.13% fail on Other components
    • 0.27% fail on Locking devices
  • 5.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 5.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 5.1% fail on Prescribed areas (63% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Condition
  • 3.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.4% fail on Body condition
    • 0.67% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.67% fail on Chassis
    • 0.40% fail on Seats
      • 0.40% fail on Drivers
    • 0.13% fail on Doors
      • 0.13% fail on Drivers
    • 0.13% fail on Spare wheel
  • 1.6% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.67% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.67% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages