Toyota MR2 MOT Results

Registered in 1991
59.7% pass rate
from 533 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1991 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota MR2 is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Brakes (67% worse than other 1991 cars)
    • 17% fail on Brake performance (110% worse than other 1991 cars)
      • 12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 1991 cars)
        • 12% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 1991 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 7.3% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 1991 cars)
        • 7.3% fail on Rbt (130% worse than other 1991 cars)
          • 6.6% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 1991 cars)
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 6.2% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 1991 cars)
        • 6.0% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 1991 cars)
          • 6.0% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 1991 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.19% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 1.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.94% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.75% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.19% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.75% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.75% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.75% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.38% fail on Cable
        • 0.19% fail on Lever
        • 0.19% fail on Clevis joint
    • 1.3% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.94% fail on Hand lever (4 times worse than other 1991 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Pedal
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake control (180% worse than other 1991 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Lever (180% worse than other 1991 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.38% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.38% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.19% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.19% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.19% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 17% fail on Suspension (49% worse than other 1991 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 5.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (3 times worse than other 1991 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (8 times worse than other 1991 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Linkage ball joints (7 times worse than other 1991 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 1991 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Ball joint (16 times worse than other 1991 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Ball joint dust cover (11 times worse than other 1991 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Linkage
      • 0.38% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (16 times worse than other 1991 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.19% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 3.4% fail on Shock absorbers (180% worse than other 1991 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.56% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.19% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.19% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.5% fail on Other suspension component (2 times worse than other 1991 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 1991 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.19% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.94% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.94% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.75% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.19% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.75% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.38% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.38% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.56% fail on Springs
      • 0.38% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.19% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.19% fail on Mounting
      • 0.19% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.19% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.19% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 4.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 3.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.75% fail on Switch
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.38% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.0% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.9% fail on Horn
      • 0.75% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.38% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 2.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.4% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.19% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.94% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.19% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.38% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.38% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.38% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 8.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.75% fail on Chassis
      • 0.75% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.75% fail on Seats
      • 0.56% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.38% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.38% fail on Body
      • 0.19% fail on Panel
      • 0.19% fail on Other body component
    • 0.38% fail on Cabs
      • 0.38% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.19% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.19% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.19% fail on Doors
      • 0.19% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.19% fail on Door condition
  • 7.5% fail on Visibility
    • 4.5% fail on Wipers
    • 3.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.38% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.38% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.19% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.4% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 1.9% fail on Catalyst emissions (170% worse than other 1991 cars)
        • 0.94% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.19% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.1% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.19% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 6.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (90% worse than other 1991 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Seat belts (91% worse than other 1991 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Prescribed areas (110% worse than other 1991 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Condition
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment
      • 0.19% fail on Pre-tensioners
  • 4.9% fail on Tyres (80% worse than other 1991 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 2.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.19% fail on Size/type
  • 3.0% fail on Steering
    • 2.3% fail on Steering gear
      • 2.3% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.38% fail on Steering linkage components (83% better than other 1991 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.19% fail on Power steering
      • 0.19% fail on Operation
    • 0.19% fail on Steering shaft
    • 0.19% fail on Steering play
      • 0.19% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.1% fail on Road Wheels (3 times worse than other 1991 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Attachment (4 times worse than other 1991 cars)
  • 0.19% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.19% fail on Speedometer

Search Good Garages