Toyota MR2 MOT Results

Registered in 1990
64.8% pass rate
from 233 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota MR2 is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Brakes (110% worse than other 1990 cars)
    • 18% fail on Brake performance (150% worse than other 1990 cars)
      • 12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 1990 cars)
        • 12% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 1990 cars)
      • 6.4% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 1990 cars)
        • 6.0% fail on Rbt (4 times worse than other 1990 cars)
          • 6.0% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 1990 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.43% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 5.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.6% fail on Rbt
          • 3.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 3.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 1990 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.86% fail on Service brake performance
    • 3.4% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (6 times worse than other 1990 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Hand lever (15 times worse than other 1990 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Pedal
    • 1.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.86% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.86% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.43% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.43% fail on Lever
    • 0.86% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.43% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.43% fail on Lever
    • 0.43% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.43% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 15% fail on Suspension (63% worse than other 1990 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (96% worse than other 1990 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (4 times worse than other 1990 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (7 times worse than other 1990 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joints (11 times worse than other 1990 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.43% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.43% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 2.1% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 1990 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Macpherson strut (6 times worse than other 1990 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Macpherson strut (21 times worse than other 1990 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.86% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.43% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.86% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.86% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.43% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.43% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.86% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.43% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 6.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.43% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 3.0% fail on Horn
      • 1.3% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.86% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.43% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.86% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.43% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.43% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.43% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.43% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.43% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 7.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.7% fail on Chassis
      • 1.7% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.43% fail on Seats
      • 0.43% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 6.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.4% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 1.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.86% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.86% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 6.0% fail on Visibility
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers
    • 2.6% fail on Washers
  • 3.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.43% fail on Attachment
  • 2.1% fail on Tyres
    • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.86% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.7% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.43% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 1.7% fail on Steering
    • 1.7% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.7% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.3% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.3% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 1990 cars)

Search Good Garages