Toyota MR2 MOT Results
Registered in 199064.8% pass rate
from 233 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1990 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota MR2 is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Brakes
(110% worse than other 1990 cars)
-
18% fail on
Brake performance
(150% worse than other 1990 cars)
-
12% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 1990 cars)
- 12% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 1990 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Parking brake performance
(4 times worse than other 1990 cars)
-
6.0% fail on
Rbt
(4 times worse than other 1990 cars)
- 6.0% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 1990 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.43% fail on Parking brake performance
-
6.0% fail on
Rbt
(4 times worse than other 1990 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Service brake performance
-
5.6% fail on
Rbt
- 3.9% fail on Service brake performance
- 3.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 1990 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Rbt
-
3.4% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
3.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 3.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.86% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
12% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 1990 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(6 times worse than other 1990 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Hand lever (15 times worse than other 1990 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Pedal
- 1.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.86% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.86% fail on Brake pads
-
0.43% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.43% fail on Lever
-
0.86% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.86% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.43% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.43% fail on Lever
-
0.43% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.43% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
18% fail on
Brake performance
(150% worse than other 1990 cars)
-
15% fail on
Suspension
(63% worse than other 1990 cars)
- 7.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (96% worse than other 1990 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(4 times worse than other 1990 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (7 times worse than other 1990 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joints (11 times worse than other 1990 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.43% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.43% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.43% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 2.1% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 1990 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Macpherson strut
(6 times worse than other 1990 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Macpherson strut (21 times worse than other 1990 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Pins and bushes
-
1.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.86% fail on Ball joint
- 0.43% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.86% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.86% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.43% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.43% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.86% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.43% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.43% fail on Ball joint
-
14% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
6.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 6.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.43% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
4.3% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 3.0% fail on Horn
- 1.3% fail on Battery(ies)
-
3.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp
-
3.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.86% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.43% fail on Side repeaters
-
3.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.86% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.43% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.43% fail on Position lamp
-
0.43% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.43% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.43% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.43% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
6.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
7.7% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 3.4% fail on Exhaust system
-
3.0% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
1.7% fail on
Chassis
- 1.7% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.43% fail on
Seats
- 0.43% fail on Passenger's seat
-
6.4% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
6.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.0% fail on
Spark ignition
- 3.4% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 1.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
-
6.0% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.86% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.86% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
6.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.0% fail on
Visibility
- 3.9% fail on Wipers
- 2.6% fail on Washers
-
3.0% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
3.0% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.0% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.43% fail on Attachment
-
3.0% fail on
Seat belts
-
2.1% fail on
Tyres
- 1.3% fail on Condition
- 0.86% fail on Tread depth
-
1.7% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.3% fail on Registration plates
- 0.43% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
1.7% fail on
Steering
-
1.7% fail on
Steering gear
- 1.7% fail on Steering rack
-
1.7% fail on
Steering gear
-
1.3% fail on
Road Wheels
- 1.3% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 1990 cars)