Toyota MR2 MOT Results
Registered in 198968.8% pass rate
from 356 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1989 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota MR2 is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Brakes
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
(46% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 7.6% fail on Rear wheels (89% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Parking brake performance (89% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Front wheels
- 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.56% fail on Brake imbalance
-
3.1% fail on
Parking brake
(2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(69% better than other 1989 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Components
(71% better than other 1989 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Pipes
- 0.28% fail on Leaks
-
1.1% fail on
Components
(71% better than other 1989 cars)
-
0.56% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.56% fail on Cable
- 0.28% fail on ABS
-
0.28% fail on
Hub components
- 0.28% fail on Brake pads
- 0.28% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.28% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.28% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
(46% worse than other 1989 cars)
-
14% fail on
Suspension
-
10% fail on
Prescribed areas
(79% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 9.0% fail on Component mounting (99% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Subframe mounting
- 0.84% fail on Spring mounting
-
4.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(3 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Attachment (10 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.56% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.56% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.56% fail on Condition
-
0.28% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.28% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.28% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.28% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.28% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.28% fail on Front
-
10% fail on
Prescribed areas
(79% worse than other 1989 cars)
-
9.8% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(50% better than other 1989 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Position lamps
- 2.5% fail on Front lamps
- 0.84% fail on Rear lamps
- 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (56% better than other 1989 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Horn
-
1.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp
- 0.28% fail on Switch
- 1.4% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.4% fail on
Direction indicators
(66% better than other 1989 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
(66% better than other 1989 cars)
- 0.84% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.28% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.28% fail on Tell tales
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
(66% better than other 1989 cars)
- 0.84% fail on Battery
-
0.56% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.56% fail on Lamp
-
3.1% fail on
Position lamps
-
5.1% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 2.8% fail on Wipers
- 2.2% fail on Washers
- 0.28% fail on Bonnet
- 0.28% fail on Windscreen
-
4.8% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 3.1% fail on Exhaust system
- 1.7% fail on Emissions
-
0.28% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.28% fail on Cap
-
4.2% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 2.5% fail on Body condition
-
2.0% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 2.0% fail on Chassis
-
3.9% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
3.9% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.9% fail on Prescribed areas
-
3.9% fail on
Seat belts
-
3.1% fail on
Tyres
- 1.7% fail on Tread depth
- 1.4% fail on Condition
-
1.7% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.7% fail on Registration plate
-
1.1% fail on
Steering
(78% better than other 1989 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Steering system
(72% better than other 1989 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Steering rack
- 0.56% fail on Track rod end
- 0.28% fail on Ball joint
- 0.28% fail on Lock stop
-
1.1% fail on
Steering system
(72% better than other 1989 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.28% fail on Attachment