Toyota MR2 MOT Results

Registered in 1987

66.7% pass rate

from 153 tests in 2021

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1987 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota MR2 is unusually good or bad.

14% fail on Brakes
- 12% fail on Brake performance (83% worse than other 1987 cars)
  - 6.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (150% worse than other 1987 cars)
    - 6.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (170% worse than other 1987 cars)
  - 5.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 5.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 3.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
      - 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
  - 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
    - 3.3% fail on Rbt
      - 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
  - 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 2.6% fail on Rbt
      - 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance
      - 0.65% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 1.3% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.65% fail on Pedal
  - 0.65% fail on Hand lever
- 1.3% fail on Parking brake control
  - 1.3% fail on Lever
12% fail on Suspension
- 9.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (200% worse than other 1987 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (10 times worse than other 1987 cars)
  - 0.65% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.65% fail on Macpherson strut
  - 0.65% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.65% fail on Suspension arms
  - 0.65% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.65% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.65% fail on Suspension rods
  - 0.65% fail on Ball joint dust cover
9.8% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.65% fail on Headlamps
  - 0.65% fail on Headlamp
- 0.65% fail on Stop lamp
- 0.65% fail on Direction indicators
  - 0.65% fail on Flashing type
    - 0.65% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.65% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.65% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.65% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.65% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
  - 0.65% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.65% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.65% fail on Battery(ies)
8.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 3.9% fail on Exhaust system
- 2.6% fail on Chassis
  - 2.6% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.65% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 0.65% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.65% fail on Floor
- 0.65% fail on Cabs
  - 0.65% fail on Prescribed areas
5.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 4.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 4.6% fail on Spark ignition
    - 3.3% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    - 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.65% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.65% fail on Engine oil leaks
3.9% fail on Visibility
- 2.0% fail on Wipers
- 2.0% fail on Washers
- 0.65% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.65% fail on Windscreen
3.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 3.3% fail on Seat belts
  - 3.3% fail on Prescribed areas
2.6% fail on Steering
- 1.3% fail on Steering play (4 times worse than other 1987 cars)
  - 1.3% fail on Steering rack (8 times worse than other 1987 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Steering gear
  - 0.65% fail on Steering rack
- 0.65% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 0.65% fail on Track rod end
0.65% fail on Tyres
- 0.65% fail on Condition