Toyota MR2 MOT Results

Registered in 1987
70.2% pass rate
from 178 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1987 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota MR2 is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Prescribed areas (140% worse than other 1987 cars)
      • 12% fail on Component mounting (2 times worse than other 1987 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Spring mounting
    • 2.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (7 times worse than other 1987 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on General condition
    • 0.56% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.56% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.56% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.56% fail on Attachment
  • 15% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 5.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.9% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.56% fail on All position lamps
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 3.9% fail on Fog lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.7% fail on Individual lamps
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.56% fail on Tell tales
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.56% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.56% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 1.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Hazard warning
      • 1.1% fail on Lamp
      • 0.56% fail on Switch
    • 0.56% fail on Battery
    • 0.56% fail on Horn
    • 0.56% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.7% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 5.6% fail on Rear wheels
      • 4.5% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
    • 3.4% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 2.8% fail on Components
        • 1.7% fail on Hoses
        • 1.1% fail on Pipes
      • 0.56% fail on Operation
    • 2.2% fail on Parking brake
      • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Hub components
      • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.56% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.56% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 5.1% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 1.7% fail on Washers
    • 1.1% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.5% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 3.9% fail on Tyres
    • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.56% fail on Size/type
  • 3.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 2.8% fail on Emissions
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust system
  • 2.8% fail on Steering
    • 2.8% fail on Steering system
      • 1.7% fail on Steering rack
      • 1.1% fail on Free play
        • 1.1% fail on Steering rack (6 times worse than other 1987 cars)
  • 2.8% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.8% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.7% fail on Road Wheels (5 times worse than other 1987 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 1987 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Condition
  • 1.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.1% fail on Body condition
    • 0.56% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.56% fail on Chassis

Search Good Garages