Toyota Land Cruiser MOT Results

Registered in 2012

84.5% pass rate

from 471 tests in 2020

(40% better than other 2012 cars)

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Land Cruiser is unusually good or bad.

7.2% fail on Brakes
- 3.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 3.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 3.4% fail on Brake pads
- 2.3% fail on Brake performance
  - 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
    - 1.3% fail on Rbt
      - 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
    - 0.21% fail on Decelerometer
      - 0.21% fail on Service brake performance
  - 0.85% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 0.42% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (10 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    - 0.21% fail on Rbt (sp)
    - 0.21% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
  - 0.21% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.21% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.21% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 1.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.64% fail on Lever
- 0.21% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.21% fail on Hand lever
- 0.21% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.21% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 0.21% fail on Anti-lock braking system
3.2% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (65% better than other 2012 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Headlamps
  - 1.5% fail on Headlamp
  - 0.21% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.64% fail on Headlamp aim (73% better than other 2012 cars)
  - 0.42% fail on Headlamp aim (81% better than other 2012 cars)
  - 0.21% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.64% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.64% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.64% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.21% fail on Switch
- 0.21% fail on Position lamps
  - 0.21% fail on Position lamp
- 0.21% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.21% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.21% fail on Horn
2.3% fail on Visibility
- 1.9% fail on Wipers
- 0.42% fail on Washers
1.9% fail on Suspension (71% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.64% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 0.64% fail on Pins and bushes (33 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Suspension arms (79% better than other 2012 cars)
  - 0.21% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.21% fail on Ball joint
- 0.21% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.21% fail on Springs
  - 0.21% fail on Coil springs
    - 0.21% fail on Coil spring
1.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 1.1% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.21% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.21% fail on Hose
- 0.21% fail on Bumpers
- 0.21% fail on Transmission
  - 0.21% fail on Drive shafts
    - 0.21% fail on Joints
- 0.21% fail on Body
  - 0.21% fail on Other body component
1.3% fail on Steering
- 0.64% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 0.64% fail on Track rod end
- 0.42% fail on Power steering (15 times worse than other 2012 cars)
  - 0.21% fail on Pipes and hoses
  - 0.21% fail on Other components
- 0.21% fail on Electronic power steering
0.85% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 0.85% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 0.85% fail on Compression ignition
    - 0.42% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 0.21% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    - 0.21% fail on Emissions not tested
0.64% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.64% fail on Registration plates
0.64% fail on Tyres (89% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Condition (84% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Tread depth
0.42% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.42% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.21% fail on Requirements
  - 0.21% fail on Condition